LogFAQs > #923850707

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	English Literature Mafia Topic 13: A Dramatic Turn of Events
pezloco 06/25/19 10:29:14 PM #137:	benjamin3740 posted... Tom Bombadil posted... benjamin3740 posted... And if that behavior causes 55% town then what behavior is making up your 45% scum? D1 reads Oh. You're one of those people whose reads linger and progress by percentile instead of changing naturally? Oh wait no those people dont exist. That's scum. I dont get it. I wanted to vote Corrik day 1 because of his attack on Puns, which I perceived to be him lying to get what he wants and since I liked Puns I thought what he wanted was a town lynch. Day 2 and 3 he stepped up and made moves I think are very town motivated, leading me to read him as town. That town read destroys the dislike for him day 1 because if someone is town they cant be scum. So if I think he's town then he aint scum! What's up with this 55% crud? Sounds like you're trying super hard to explain a slow gradual change of opinion on Pez. Real reads are more instantaneous than that. Why does 55% not make sense? I don't think reads are instantaneous like that unless you have a really strong read, which Tom has not this game expressed on me. Like I lean town on Corrik. That's largely because on D1 I saw three different possible motivations for his actions. Two of those were town motivations and the lone scum motivation I put as unlikely. My confidence in that read grew. Like I was maybe 70% sure D1. And now I'm not sure what would have to change for me to vote him. Just to throw a percentage out call it 95%. Say Tom started at 70% scum on me D1, but my actions continued to look more like the town side. Then it would slide back down to apparently 45% scum now. I don't see how this concept is confusing. Maybe it's specifically confusing in this instance and not as a concept? I got the impression though that you find this concept unreal itself. As for the highly accurate comment you made. When we've actually claimed ROOMMATE POWERS we've each only been wrong once. But it's not a point either of us immediately get to. The read evolves. He has not claimed roommate powers on me and I have not claimed roommate powers on him. In fact I had a whole post where I said based on the fact that we haven't played much recently on our own or together and the fact that we haven't lived in the same state let alone together in more than half a decade that I was no longer confident in claiming that phrase anymore. I cite last game, WWE mafia. I had a good read on him. I thought he was scum and he was. But I wasn't confident in that read at all. You should pay attention to what we say about each other. And then you should take that information and weigh it against your own read. You've called my explanations of this fake. I'm curious what part of this sounds fake? Maybe I can explain it better. --- I'm the Pez and I'm AWESOME <cite>pezloco posted [p:923850707] in English Li... [t:77818367]...</cite> <quote><cite>benjamin3740 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tom Bombadil posted...</cite> <quote><cite>benjamin3740 posted...</cite> <quote>And if that behavior causes 55% town then what behavior is making up your 45% scum?</quote> D1 reads</quote> Oh. You're one of those people whose reads linger and progress by percentile instead of changing naturally? Oh wait no those people dont exist. That's scum. I dont get it. I wanted to vote Corrik day 1 because of his attack on Puns, which I perceived to be him lying to get what he wants and since I liked Puns I thought what he wanted was a town lynch. Day 2 and 3 he stepped up and made moves I think are very town motivated, leading me to read him as town. That town read destroys the dislike for him day 1 because if someone is town they cant be scum. So if I think he's town then he aint scum! What's up with this 55% crud? Sounds like you're trying super hard to explain a slow gradual change of opinion on Pez. Real reads are more instantaneous than that.</quote> Why does 55% not make sense? I don't think reads are instantaneous like that unless you have a really strong read, which Tom has not this game expressed on me. Like I lean town on Corrik. That's largely because on D1 I saw three different possible motivations for his actions. Two of those were town motivations and the lone scum motivation I put as unlikely. My confidence in that read grew. Like I was maybe 70% sure D1. And now I'm not sure what would have to change for me to vote him. Just to throw a percentage out call it 95%. Say Tom started at 70% scum on me D1, but my actions continued to look more like the town side. Then it would slide back down to apparently 45% scum now. I don't see how this concept is confusing. Maybe it's specifically confusing in this instance and not as a concept? I got the impression though that you find this concept unreal itself. As for the highly accurate comment you made. When we've actually claimed ROOMMATE POWERS we've each only been wrong once. But it's not a point either of us immediately get to. The read evolves. He has not claimed roommate powers on me and I have not claimed roommate powers on him. In fact I had a whole post where I said based on the fact that we haven't played much recently on our own or together and the fact that we haven't lived in the same state let alone together in more than half a decade that I was no longer confident in claiming that phrase anymore. I cite last game, WWE mafia. I had a good read on him. I thought he was scum and he was. But I wasn't confident in that read at all. You should pay attention to what we say about each other. And then you should take that information and weigh it against your own read. You've called my explanations of this fake. I'm curious what part of this sounds fake? Maybe I can explain it better. --- I'm the Pez and I'm AWESOME</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1