LogFAQs > #925273630

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The SephG Top 250 [movies] - Topic II: the top 75
Nelson_Mandela 07/27/19 9:45:07 PM #384:	Saw Once Upon a Time in Hollywood tonight. Really torn on it. On one hand, it's easily Tarantino's best movie since the Kill Bills. On the other, I really think it could have been even better--and I am annoyed by that. Spoiling the ending here: There was no reason to even have the Sharon Tate element of the film. I sort of get that Tarantino was going for the "fairy tale" ending, but the alternative history twist was already done--by him--in Inglorious Basterds. There was really no reason why they had to use the literal Manson Family in order to achieve the same ending. I just left feeling disappointed, honestly. Almost an emotional cop-out. I'll need to sit on this for awhile. --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso <cite>Nelson_Mandela posted [p:925273630] in The SephG ... [t:77811548]...</cite> <quote>Saw Once Upon a Time in Hollywood tonight. Really torn on it. On one hand, it's easily Tarantino's best movie since the Kill Bills. On the other, I really think it could have been even better--and I am annoyed by that. Spoiling the ending here: There was no reason to even have the Sharon Tate element of the film. I sort of get that Tarantino was going for the "fairy tale" ending, but the alternative history twist was already done--by him--in Inglorious Basterds. There was really no reason why they had to use the literal Manson Family in order to achieve the same ending. I just left feeling disappointed, honestly. Almost an emotional cop-out. I'll need to sit on this for awhile. --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1