LogFAQs > #925428111

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicNationalist politics topic 16: Zealots accidentally bring us to historical truth
foolm0r0n
07/31/19 11:22:10 AM
#488:


Vlado posted...
I would regardless of statistics. That much is obvious.

It is to you but not to the border authorities. If you truly believe that you don't define words (e.g. racism) then you need to face this reality. You're staying in Bulgaria the rest of your life so it doesn't matter though right?

Vlado posted...
Both apply. You should consider the country, but also the individual. That's common sense.

See, again you are putting the country over the individual. When really the individual is all that matters in this case. The terrorist from the 99% nice country should obviously be rejected, and the cancer doctor from the 99% evil country should obviously be let in.

You just can't let go of the idea that the origin country defines the individual more than anything though. I thought it was because you want to be able to reject totally fine brown people from your country, but now it seems more personal -- you want to be admitted into a foreign country (Japan?) as an average nice Bulgarian, rather than this anti-social radicalized statistical outlier individual.
---
_foolmo_
2 + 2 = 4
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1