LogFAQs > #927439386

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	College Football (NCAA) Discussion Topic
jcgamer107 09/14/19 5:58:25 PM #57:	I don't think anyone ranked above UCF has struggled against that bad of opposition. My guess is that Army's a good deal better than Florida Atlantic, for example. I do agree that voters are too hesitant to move teams down after ugly wins (and feel too obligated to drop teams a certain amount after a close loss to a quality team). Michigan should have dropped out of the top 10 after their first game, and especially after the Army game. I have Michigan 15th and UCF 16th, and will probably move UCF ahead of them barring a huge Stanford comeback. --- Official Advokaiser advocate <cite>jcgamer107 posted [p:927439386] in College Fo... [t:77961175]...</cite> <quote>I don't think anyone ranked above UCF has struggled against that bad of opposition. My guess is that Army's a good deal better than Florida Atlantic, for example. I do agree that voters are too hesitant to move teams down after ugly wins (and feel too obligated to drop teams a certain amount after a close loss to a quality team). Michigan should have dropped out of the top 10 after their first game, and especially after the Army game. I have Michigan 15th and UCF 16th, and will probably move UCF ahead of them barring a huge Stanford comeback. --- Official Advokaiser advocate</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1