LogFAQs > #930187552

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 248: a Perfect impeachment hearing
red sox 777 11/15/19 4:27:13 PM #207:	HeroicSpiderPig posted... red sox 777 posted... If you're going to charge him with witness intimidation or whatever based on them, then yes, that does violate his freedom of speech rights. So it's not illegal to intimidate someone through speech? That would certainly...not hold up in any courtroom anywhere. It is, unless the speech is protected free speech. Those tweets contained basically 100% political opinions, which are the most protected of protected free speech. I didn't see anything intimidating or threatening in there. Unless there are some other tweets that were deleted that I didn't see. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! <cite>red sox 777 posted [p:930187552] in Politics C... [t:78156185]...</cite> <quote>HeroicSpiderPig posted...</cite> <quote>red sox 777 posted... </cite> <quote>If you're going to charge him with witness intimidation or whatever based on them, then yes, that does violate his freedom of speech rights.</quote> So it's not illegal to intimidate someone through speech? That would certainly...not hold up in any courtroom anywhere. </quote> It is, unless the speech is protected free speech. Those tweets contained basically 100% political opinions, which are the most protected of protected free speech. I didn't see anything intimidating or threatening in there. Unless there are some other tweets that were deleted that I didn't see. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1