LogFAQs > #930194888

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicI've genuinely never seen this much bad PR for a game before (Pokemon)
OrangeDawn
11/15/19 7:26:55 PM
#108:


LinkPizza posted...
OrangeDawn posted...
LinkPizza posted...
OrangeDawn posted...
LinkPizza posted...
GanonsSpirit posted...
The failed to answer the question in that post.

How so? I said that we dont need anything in return. Its there game, its their choice.

willingly taking less content and in return getting a higher price and a less polished product seems incredibly stupid. where is the line?

The higher price was never going to change. And should never have been an issue. As thats he pricenof a Switch game. The higher price issue is asinine. And anyone who thought that the price would be anything other than $60 first day as a big Nintendo franchise on console sounds like they werent thinking. Just like the other console Pokmon games that also had less content...

Nintendo said to expect more from SwSh because they were mainline pokemon games where as Let's Go was for more casual players and those new to the series. Again, I ask: Where is the line? How much content needs to be cut for you to say the product they're putting out is bad?

Nintendo says a lot of things. But they probably meant expect more than the Lets Go games. Like you said, it was more casual...

So you cannot answer my question?
---
3DS Friend Code: 3308-5843-0863 Town: Virginia
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1