LogFAQs > #930195358

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicI've genuinely never seen this much bad PR for a game before (Pokemon)
LinkPizza
11/15/19 7:38:42 PM
#111:


GanonsSpirit posted...
LinkPizza posted...
The higher price was never going to change. And should never have been an issue. As thats he pricenof a Switch game. The higher price issue is asinine. And anyone who thought that the price would be anything other than $60 first day as a big Nintendo franchise on console sounds like they werent thinking. Just like the other console Pokmon games that also had less content...
I don't know why you can't seem to comprehend the idea that if the price goes up, people expect to get more content, not less. The fact that it's on the Switch is irrelevant when the product is worse than when it was on the 3DS.

Doesnt matter why they expect. And it didnt go up. Switch games always cost $60. Just because Ive bought Zelda games for handhelds at less than $60 doesnt mean the system versions should be less, as well. I dont see why you cant comprehend that Switch games of Nintendo big name first party games would most likely start at $60. If thats too much for you to pay for the content, you dont get it. Some people dont think any of the handheld games are worth $40, so they just dont buy it. The fact thats its on Switch is not irrelevant. Its most likely literally how they chose the price.

Like, I think the GC pokemon games had less content, as well... But still cost the same as other GC games...
---
Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1