LogFAQs > #930519839

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Democrat congressman blames McConnell for California school shooting
joe40001 11/22/19 7:23:16 AM #91:	darkjedilink posted... joe40001 posted... darkjedilink posted... joe40001 posted... Mr Hangman posted... joe40001 posted... People legitimately think the laws will not save lives? Yeah, duh. There's plenty of laws that don't do what they're intended. Let's put it this way: What do you think are the odds Federal Gun Licenses + UBC + Red Flag laws + No selling to violent criminals would prevent at least 1 mass shooting? Federal voting licenses + universal voter background checks + red flag voter laws + voter ID + no violent criminals voting would prevent at least 1 illegal vote, right? Yes So, by your logic, we should implement all of that, regardless of who's rights are trampled. No. My logic is about negatives vs positives. What is the cost of new laws and what might it do? A "red flag" law on voting (whatever you might mean by that) is not really going to help anything at all, but could suppress legitimate votes. UBC and licensing isn't going to be that much of a burden on responsible gun owners but will save lives. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:930519839] in Democrat c... [t:78164909]...</cite> <quote>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted...</cite> <quote>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted...</cite> <quote>Mr Hangman posted...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted...</cite> <quote>People legitimately think the laws will not save lives?</quote> Yeah, duh. There's plenty of laws that don't do what they're intended.</quote> Let's put it this way: What do you think are the odds Federal Gun Licenses + UBC + Red Flag laws + No selling to violent criminals would prevent at least 1 mass shooting?</quote> Federal voting licenses + universal voter background checks + red flag voter laws + voter ID + no violent criminals voting would prevent at least 1 illegal vote, right?</quote> Yes</quote> So, by your logic, we should implement all of that, regardless of who's rights are trampled.</quote> No. My logic is about negatives vs positives. What is the cost of new laws and what might it do? A "red flag" law on voting (whatever you might mean by that) is not really going to help anything at all, but could suppress legitimate votes. UBC and licensing isn't going to be that much of a burden on responsible gun owners but will save lives. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1