LogFAQs > #934987262

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	In 1965 CEOs in US earned 20x more than the average worker. In 2015 it was 300x
Broseph_Stalin 02/28/20 8:16:28 AM #32:	MacadamianNut3 posted... Unfortunately there are a tad bit more than 2 companies with CEOs, so sorry for the lack of astonishment over "large number divided by 2.1 million is a small number, therefore argument over sheeple" ANY fucking CEO compensation divided up by the workforce is going to result in a low number, you have missed the point by a mile. A smaller company also means less CEO pay and the end result remains the same. You can take a company with tons of revenue, high CEO compensation and relatively few employees like Chevron and you'll find the exact same thing, CEO pay has no impact on average wages. Sit. Down. <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:934987262] in In 1965 CE... [t:78437158]...</cite> <quote>MacadamianNut3 posted... </cite> <quote>Unfortunately there are a tad bit more than 2 companies with CEOs, so sorry for the lack of astonishment over "large number divided by 2.1 million is a small number, therefore argument over sheeple"</quote> ANY fucking CEO compensation divided up by the workforce is going to result in a low number, you have missed the point by a mile. A smaller company also means less CEO pay and the end result remains the same. You can take a company with tons of revenue, high CEO compensation and relatively few employees like Chevron and you'll find the exact same thing, CEO pay has no impact on average wages. Sit. Down. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1