LogFAQs > #941809241

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Detective is FIRED for saying Protesters should SHOOT BACK at COPS! She a MILF?
streamofthesky 07/07/20 6:10:53 PM #12:	Zeus posted... Now? lolwut? It's NEVER been appropriate to shoot at cops. Attacking members of law enforcement has been banned by every government that every existed and likely every government that ever will exist. The only gray area is when law enforcement fails to identify themselves, but the sign explicitly endorses violence against cops so that goes out the window. What's pathetic is an inability to understand why advocating shooting a person's own coworkers is bad. What's pathetic is you intentionally missing the words "protestors" and shooting "back". She wasn't advocating for people to just go murder cops. She was talking about all the innocent people that cops have fired upon. The same side that defends owning assault weapons and massive stockpiles of guns and talks about "armed resistance" if the government ever tries to take their guns then turns around and says it's wrong to shoot at government agents (cops) that fired upon you first, because now the group in question isn't theirs. <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:941809241] in Detective ... [t:78829716]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted... </cite> <quote>Now? lolwut? It's NEVER been appropriate to shoot at cops. Attacking members of law enforcement has been banned by every government that every existed and likely every government that ever will exist. The only gray area is when law enforcement fails to identify themselves, but the sign explicitly endorses violence against cops so that goes out the window. What's pathetic is an inability to understand why advocating shooting a person's own coworkers is bad.</quote>What's pathetic is you intentionally missing the words "protestors" and shooting "back". She wasn't advocating for people to just go murder cops. She was talking about all the innocent people that cops have fired upon. The same side that defends owning assault weapons and massive stockpiles of guns and talks about "armed resistance" if the government ever tries to take their guns then turns around and says it's wrong to shoot at government agents (cops) that fired upon you first, because now the group in question isn't theirs. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1