LogFAQs > #941814844

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Detective is FIRED for saying Protesters should SHOOT BACK at COPS! She a MILF?
Zeus 07/07/20 8:21:22 PM #15:	streamofthesky posted... What's pathetic is you intentionally missing the words "protestors" and shooting "back". She wasn't advocating for people to just go murder cops. She was talking about all the innocent people that cops have fired upon. What's pathetic is that you believe cops are just shooting live rounds at protestors without any justification. How many protestors have been reported shot to death by cops in the past few months? ZERO. How many have been injured by actual bullets? Probably also zero. And it's pathetic to conflate non-lethal, rubber rounds with live rounds.... and even more pathetic to suggest responding to rubber rounds with live rounds. streamofthesky posted... The same side that defends owning assault weapons and massive stockpiles of guns and talks about "armed resistance" if the government ever tries to take their guns then turns around and says it's wrong to shoot at government agents (cops) that fired upon you first, because now the group in question isn't theirs. You can put your strawman back next to your Dorothy and Toto. As for preppers, they're worried about ACTUAL government malfeasance, not cops trying to restore order under lawless conditions. And, I should add, if the cops weren't there to restore order, it would be up to civilians like those armed preppers to protect themselves and their neighborhoods. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:941814844] in Detective ... [t:78829716]...</cite> <quote>streamofthesky posted... </cite> <quote>What's pathetic is you intentionally missing the words "protestors" and shooting "back". She wasn't advocating for people to just go murder cops. She was talking about all the innocent people that cops have fired upon.</quote> What's pathetic is that you believe cops are just shooting live rounds at protestors without any justification. How many protestors have been reported shot to death by cops in the past few months? ZERO. How many have been injured by actual bullets? Probably also zero. And it's pathetic to conflate non-lethal, rubber rounds with live rounds.... and even more pathetic to suggest responding to rubber rounds with live rounds. streamofthesky posted... </cite> <quote>The same side that defends owning assault weapons and massive stockpiles of guns and talks about "armed resistance" if the government ever tries to take their guns then turns around and says it's wrong to shoot at government agents (cops) that fired upon you first, because now the group in question isn't theirs.</quote> You can put your strawman back next to your Dorothy and Toto. As for preppers, they're worried about ACTUAL government malfeasance, not cops trying to restore order under lawless conditions. And, I should add, if the cops weren't there to restore order, it would be up to civilians like those armed preppers to protect themselves and their neighborhoods. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1