LogFAQs > #946163809

Nobody gets to say Corrik argues in good faith after that "illegals" dictionary definition shit, that he believes what he says doesn't matter when the way he cements his beliefs is disingenuous and selective in the first place. It's all bad faith because Corrik doesn't actually engage anything honestly, to him you're all just saying liberal things because you're liberals so there's no argument to even be had.

this whole damn pages long spat you're all beating to death was already countered by Corrik's very own argument backfiring on himself but you just let him stroll past that little whoopsie and just keep on trucking

---

http://gmun.moe/ffcc
GuessMyUserName's account's very own account!