LogFAQs > #946329025

Geez, kids these days have a lot of money.

Apparently the 19 y/o had a mental disorder and a history of planning, making threats, etc, -- including planning a mass shooting during Black Friday 2019 -- which he hadn't carried out. Ironically, he's a prime candidate for Trump's red flag laws (ie, taking guns from potentially risky individuals after which they could argue in court to get them back)

kind9 posted...

A couple weeks ago a Trump cultist on TikTok was calling for civil war if Biden wins, essentially saying if he does win they're going to start murdering people. All of his social media accounts disappeared quickly after that. It goes without saying, but these people are truly deranged.

But apparently the countless more liberals on TikTok, Twitter, Facebook, etc, calling for civil war if Trump wins are a-okay in your book because you make no mention of them despite being far larger in number and, in many cases, showing off their weapons in their posts? Little funny how if you're just highlighting social media posts you bring up the smaller group rather than also criticizing the larger one. It's almost like you believe in selectively condemning it or something.

streamofthesky posted...

Oh look, another far right lunatic pretending to be angry that Bernie lost just to stir up shit, despite clearly not being a Bernie voter! Cause yeah, nothing says "Bernie Sanders supporter" like trying to massacre abortion clinics!
(pre-emptively posting this before a certain fake "center left" troll tries to claim he was a leftist and makes a fool of himself)

...except for the fact that he could have legitimately been a Bernie supporter. Keep in mind that the so-called "BernBros" were repeatedly called out for their racism, etc, and that both Bernie & Trump appeal to people who dislike the political establishment. But keep trolling, flaming, and being all-around horrible. You're better at flaming and mischaracterizing than you are actually arguing a point. If you had been better at it, you wouldn't be making those completely bullshit claims when the very thing you cite mentions that his pro-Bernie stuff was posted ON the site your source mentions is associated with far-right white nationals, which doesn't so much scream "false flag" as it does "sincere belief" because if he was only pretending to be a Bernie supporter he'd be posting on a site not associated with that. So grats on undermining your preemptive argument?

---

(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.