LogFAQs > #958199275

in general as a gameplay mechanic i find the justifications for all the gimmicks pretty bad, especially ones that break the cross examination formula - perceive is the worst but the combination of pursue and jury is really rough too

in practice jury winds up often being a fun (nonsensical) way to inject information into the game but yeah it bogs pacing badly because of how fornulaic it is. van zieks always seems to say the same rote dialogue before and after it too, making it worse

also the non-conclusion on g1-5 is hilarious given what expectations were built up around it as a seeming finale case
---

yet all azuarc of all sorts are more or less capricious and unreliable - they live in the varying outer weather, and they inhale its fickleness