LogFAQs > #958357743

That's the funniest part, really.

But this really shouldn't be treated with any seriousness. I remember earlier in the process when they came out and said there were like 10,000 fraudulent votes and the state had to explain to them that they were literally reading the data wrong or some such (IIRC the data they were working with to make that claim didn't cover the full range of days of early voting or something - I know one of the AZ Election Data guys had already noticed and explained the exact error they had made almost instantly) and they were super passive aggressive in acknowledging their mistake.

But of course the right wing conspiracy nuts had already run out and screamed the original claim everywhere by then and were predictably silent when the self-inflicted error was acknowledged.

oh and also i think the state has to trash every part of the election infrastructure these guys got their hands on because the fact that they were just letting people with no experience or credentials handle senstive election equipment means they could no longer be sure it wasn't compromised so that'll come at taxpayer expense of course

---

xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out?