LogFAQs > #962143919

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Any of y'all ever wonder what it was like for cave-people to have sex?
Kakapo 01/28/22 1:42:26 AM #23:	Robot2600 posted... https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/may/14/early-men-women-equal-scientists "Early Men and Women were equal size" https://theconversation.com/did-prehistoric-women-hunt-new-research-suggests-so-149477 This talks about how cavewomen hunted probably equal to men. At a Neolithic hunter burial site they could identify 41% of the skeletons as women. Some I think they couldn't tell one way or the other. Those articles are saying that the gender roles were roughly equal, not that there wasnt sexual dimorphism Edit: those were very interesting articles, the sexual dimorphism issue aside. The general consensus is that sexual dimorphism was more pronounced with early human ancestors, as it is for non-human primates and that its something that early humans lost over time, as opposed to developed recently as youve suggest. I dont have a horse in this race and am quite prepared to admit Im wrong - it just goes against everything Ive read previously. --- Did my singing please you? No, the words you sang were wrong 24 hour party parrot <cite>Kakapo posted [p:962143919] in Any of y'a... [t:79872942]...</cite> <quote>Robot2600 posted... </cite> <quote>https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/may/14/early-men-women-equal-scientists "Early Men and Women were equal size" https://theconversation.com/did-prehistoric-women-hunt-new-research-suggests-so-149477 This talks about how cavewomen hunted probably equal to men. At a Neolithic hunter burial site they could identify 41% of the skeletons as women. Some I think they couldn't tell one way or the other.</quote> Those articles are saying that the gender roles were roughly equal, not that there wasnt sexual dimorphism Edit: those were very interesting articles, the sexual dimorphism issue aside. The general consensus is that sexual dimorphism was more pronounced with early human ancestors, as it is for non-human primates and that its something that early humans lost over time, as opposed to developed recently as youve suggest. I dont have a horse in this race and am quite prepared to admit Im wrong - it just goes against everything Ive read previously. --- Did my singing please you? No, the words you sang were wrong 24 hour party parrot</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1