LogFAQs > #962150836

Didn't read the bill, is this article being sensational or is that actually in the bill?

edit: welp

NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER STATUTE:
1. THE LEGISLATURE SHALL CALL ITSELF INTO SESSION TO REVIEW THE BALLOT TABULATING PROCESS FOR THE REGULAR PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS AND ON REVIEW SHALL ACCEPT OR REJECT THE ELECTION RESULTS. IF THE LEGISLATURE ACCEPTS THE ELECTION RESULTS, THE ELECTION CANVASS AND RELATED CERTIFICATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS MAY PROCEED AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY LAW, AND THE LEGISLATURE MAY ADJOURN ITS SESSION. IF THE LEGISLATURE REJECTS THE ELECTION RESULTS, ANY QUALIFIED ELECTOR MAY FILE AN ACTION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TO REQUEST THAT A NEW ELECTION BE HELD.

haha there's also a piece about masks

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY RECORDER AND OFFICER IN CHARGE OF ELECTIONS MAY NOT REQUIRE THAT A VOTER, A BOARD WORKER OR ANY OTHER PERSON WEAR A FACIAL MASK AT A POLLING PLACE OR OTHER VOTING OR TABULATING LOCATION OR BE VACCINATED AGAINST OR TESTED FOR A VIRUS AS A CONDITION OF ENTERING A POLLING PLACE OR OTHER VOTING OR TABULATING LOCATION.