LogFAQs > #962155190

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why do 90% of pro-capitalism arguments
WingsOfGood 01/28/22 1:46:11 PM #101:	Squall28 posted... Do you know what "typically" means? Capital And I see you chose to ignore the point in favor of arguing semantics. The point is you have to work to create value. Either you don't take advantage of economy of scale and work your ass off for a lower quality of life, or you decide to get a job so you can buy these things doing less work than you would have to doing it yourself. Did you not know the natives believed no one could own the land and shared things made among their tribes? You are literally looking at what is essentially a socialized government and claiming they easily made capital. But then you claim that someone would be a problem to new system of government based on socialism. But no, it is not Capital. Squall28 posted... And I see you chose to ignore the point in favor of arguing semantics. The point is you have to work to create value. Either you don't take advantage of economy of scale and work your ass off for a lower quality of life, or you decide to get a job so you can buy these things doing less work than you would have to doing it yourself. What point are you trying to make? Do you not understand Socialism or something? <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:962155190] in Why do 90%... [t:79873187]...</cite> <quote>Squall28 posted... </cite> <quote>Do you know what "typically" means? Capital And I see you chose to ignore the point in favor of arguing semantics. The point is you have to work to create value. Either you don't take advantage of economy of scale and work your ass off for a lower quality of life, or you decide to get a job so you can buy these things doing less work than you would have to doing it yourself.</quote> Did you not know the natives believed no one could own the land and shared things made among their tribes? You are literally looking at what is essentially a socialized government and claiming they easily made capital. But then you claim that someone would be a problem to new system of government based on socialism. But no, it is not Capital. Squall28 posted... </cite> <quote>And I see you chose to ignore the point in favor of arguing semantics. The point is you have to work to create value. Either you don't take advantage of economy of scale and work your ass off for a lower quality of life, or you decide to get a job so you can buy these things doing less work than you would have to doing it yourself.</quote> What point are you trying to make? Do you not understand Socialism or something? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1