LogFAQs > #969878223

FigureOfSpeech posted...

it was yeah. Like I get the point of it, but I feel like the dialog was over the top and costly in effectiveness. "Dingus" is not an effective term. Jackson said that at least twice. He used another term for penis that I also found ineffective and did so also at least twice. For a scene like that to really hit home, I feel like Samuel L. Jackson had to stick to the most common and raw terms for male genitalia... Penis, Dick, Cock. Tarantino's choice of dialog made the scene convoluted and less effective. I'm not a fucking movie critic but like what if some day I was? I would want this statement to be the one that launched my movie critic career because I think it's really fucking important and I stand by it that hard.

Nah man. The scene was perfect. It was to illicit enough anger into a man to try and shoot him, full well knowing he was going to die in the process, and it worked.

it was just a lot to watch.