LogFAQs > #969878254

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Doing a blind Tarantino marathon
FigureOfSpeech 12/03/22 2:53:24 AM #60:	MICHALECOLE posted... Nah man. The scene was perfect. It was to illicit enough anger into a man to try and shoot him, full well knowing he was going to die in the process, and it worked. it was just a lot to watch. don't get me wrong. It was a good scene and I knew what it was going into it, but I felt like the dialog was a little bit dumbed down. It was silly to me on first watch. On 2nd (knowing the scene), it was much more clear, but it felt like Samuel L. Jackson's character was holding back a bit on the provocation (that's what I meant when I talked about the penis references). I feel like it was made to be a bit too silly, when in context, Jackson should have been going all in on the provocation. <cite>FigureOfSpeech posted [p:969878254] in Doing a bl... [t:80259314]...</cite> <quote>MICHALECOLE posted... </cite><quote>Nah man. The scene was perfect. It was to illicit enough anger into a man to try and shoot him, full well knowing he was going to die in the process, and it worked. it was just a lot to watch.</quote>don't get me wrong. It was a good scene and I knew what it was going into it, but I felt like the dialog was a little bit dumbed down. It was silly to me on first watch. On 2nd (knowing the scene), it was much more clear, but it felt like Samuel L. Jackson's character was holding back a bit on the provocation (that's what I meant when I talked about the penis references). I feel like it was made to be a bit too silly, when in context, Jackson should have been going all in on the provocation.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1