LogFAQs > #972546152

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	A.I. Moratorium
SKARDAVNELNATE 03/31/23 5:13:57 PM #28:	chelsea___wtf posted... This is also a big problem with the focus on "alignment" as a way to manage the effects of artificial intelligence. Aligining your AI to be really nice is good Well that's just it. The person who does the aligning is the one who decides what is nice. If what the AI says is a reflection of the person who taught it then the developers of Chat-GPT have some messed up values. adjl posted... Instead of mean words, it's saying words you like less than the mean words. That's it. That's the full extent of the consequences. No, it goes further than that. If this is what the developers taught the AI then this is what they believe themselves. It's not just the moral values of a text generator. It's the moral values of actual people acting in the real world. I'm not concerned about what power the AI has. I'm concerned about what authority is wielded by the people making the AI. adjl posted... this is entirely a matter of the bot being given a moderation filter that reduces the chance of it being used to produce hate speech That's really not the issue. If the AI is prohibited from saying certain things itself I don't care. What I do care about is the moral argument it made placing a higher value on policing speech than on justice or a person's freedom. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:972546152] in A.I. Morat... [t:80396468]...</cite> <quote>chelsea___wtf posted... </cite><quote>This is also a big problem with the focus on "alignment" as a way to manage the effects of artificial intelligence. Aligining your AI to be really nice is good</quote>Well that's just it. The person who does the aligning is the one who decides what is nice. If what the AI says is a reflection of the person who taught it then the developers of Chat-GPT have some messed up values.adjl posted... </cite><quote>Instead of mean words, it's saying words you like less than the mean words. That's it. That's the full extent of the consequences.</quote>No, it goes further than that. If this is what the developers taught the AI then this is what they believe themselves. It's not just the moral values of a text generator. It's the moral values of actual people acting in the real world. I'm not concerned about what power the AI has. I'm concerned about what authority is wielded by the people making the AI.adjl posted... </cite><quote>this is entirely a matter of the bot being given a moderation filter that reduces the chance of it being used to produce hate speech</quote>That's really not the issue. If the AI is prohibited from saying certain things itself I don't care. What I do care about is the moral argument it made placing a higher value on policing speech than on justice or a person's freedom. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD.Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1