LogFAQs > #973278690

Giant_Aspirin posted...

check the article

edit: what's funny is that those stats were only in the article. so you clicked it. and read it. but stopped like two sentences too early. it's even called out with a ** next to the stats.

i read it. it just doesn't sound like an answer.

"we have the numbers, but they're just small, so we're going to omit them"

id maybe get not putting them in the summary, but they arent even in the detailed section on page 9. same disclaimer.

why tell us to interpret them with caution when they aren't even in there?