LogFAQs > #975641586

foolm0r0n posted...

I'm afraid this post shows this convo is completely over your head

I mean either you think Metacritic score is completely uncorrelated with how "good" a game is, in which case a game scoring in the 50s would have equal probability of being "good" as a game in the 90, so the collection of games scoring <70 Metacritic would be way better than those >85 due to sheer quantity. Or you think Metacritic score is actually positively correlated, in which case it's not illogical to use it as one of many factors used to curate games.

At the end of the day, it's literally just games. It's not some high culture thing. If you have fun and enjoy yourself, that's really all that matters.