LogFAQs > #978970666

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Oh we're back
adjl 02/21/24 8:20:04 PM #11:	BoomerKuwanger posted... If they were gonna shut the place down it doesn't make sense to me that they'd put it in read only mode. If only though. Set me free from this dumb site It makes some sense. Read-only would be less resource-intensive than having to process inputs as well, including not needing to have anyone to moderate content. In read-only mode, they still get ad revenue from anyone that ends up coming to read guides or whatever posts are left (which show up in search engines), so there's some value in keeping the site alive in read-only mode for that. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:978970666] in Oh we're b... [t:80702452]...</cite> <quote>BoomerKuwanger posted... </cite><quote>If they were gonna shut the place down it doesn't make sense to me that they'd put it in read only mode. If only though. Set me free from this dumb site</quote>It makes some sense. Read-only would be less resource-intensive than having to process inputs as well, including not needing to have anyone to moderate content. In read-only mode, they still get ad revenue from anyone that ends up coming to read guides or whatever posts are left (which show up in search engines), so there's some value in keeping the site alive in read-only mode for that. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1