LogFAQs > #979437358

emblem-man posted...

We won't get better infrastructure (public transportation) unless the density makes sense. Density won't make sense if dense housing is not allowed. We get dense housing by removing legal barriers to build dense housing.

You are ignoring that this allows them to build anywhere. They are going to build in the cheapest areas to build, which means in the middle of nowhere, or next to potential nuisances like military installations. In the case of one, being in the middle of nowhere means the state is now going to have to put more money into infrastructure(water, sewage, roads, lighting). You are ignoring how much power this would give developments, and it's not good. And point two, would you really want to live right next to Luke AFB?

emblem-man posted...

Being for more housing should not be a partisan issue.
You're essentially saying you don't want any bills to pass if it gets Republican votes?

Half assed bill...if a bill proposing to remove minimum lot and house sizes can't get passes, what makes you think more drastic bills that will do more to fix housing will get fixed?

What part of half-assed, short-sited do you not understand? A quick fix isn't a fix. It's a ticking time bomb.

I'm all for more housing, more affordable housing, but this bill isn't it. I don't know what's so hard to understand.

Arizona is a red state, turned purple, angling towards blue. I'd rather wait for democratic legislation to come up with an actual solution as opposed to a band-aid.

Yeah it sucks, it's not what I want. But this bill is ass.