LogFAQs > #979592467

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Fake SF Progressive limit heights that block rich white homeowners
emblem-man 03/27/24 2:09:19 PM #11:	ClayGuida posted... If it was, then other cities wouldn't have these laws as well. You can't be pro nature then support obstructing bay/lake/ocean views with high rises. As I stated you could build these high rises anywhere else, not in the middle of a tourist district. Yes you can. Higher density housing means you don't have to build out as far and sprawl. Density is the pro-nature position. --- http://avatar.xboxlive.com/avatar/emblem%20boy/avatar-body.png haters gonna hate <cite>emblem-man posted [p:979592467] in Fake SF Pr... [t:80732066]...</cite> <quote>ClayGuida posted... </cite><quote>If it was, then other cities wouldn't have these laws as well. You can't be pro nature then support obstructing bay/lake/ocean views with high rises. As I stated you could build these high rises anywhere else, not in the middle of a tourist district.</quote>Yes you can. Higher density housing means you don't have to build out as far and sprawl. Density is the pro-nature position. --- http://avatar.xboxlive.com/avatar/emblem%20boy/avatar-body.pnghaters gonna hate</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1