LogFAQs > #980060731

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	FTC bans non-compete agreements
Horith 04/23/24 6:59:57 PM #30:	TheGoldenEel posted... lol at the optimism the article says the chamber of commerce is planning to sue immediately this will certainly be blocked by a trump appointed judge before it even goes into effect Oh yeah, I forgot that injunctions to block any sort of enforcement is a thing. So yeah, this rule is, like so many things that might actually help workers, worth less than the paper it was printed on. But hey, at least the FTC tried, as opposed to actively working to undermine labor rights. Although the logic of the conservative members about how noncompete clauses encourage investment in training and worker retention is fucking laughable. Im not sure what would be sadder, them knowing its an outright lie or actually believing the bullshit they spewed. <cite>Horith posted [p:980060731] in FTC bans n... [t:80753918]...</cite> <quote>TheGoldenEel posted... </cite><quote>lol at the optimismthe article says the chamber of commerce is planning to sue immediatelythis will certainly be blocked by a trump appointed judge before it even goes into effect</quote>Oh yeah, I forgot that injunctions to block any sort of enforcement is a thing. So yeah, this rule is, like so many things that might actually help workers, worth less than the paper it was printed on. But hey, at least the FTC tried, as opposed to actively working to undermine labor rights. Although the logic of the conservative members about how noncompete clauses encourage investment in training and worker retention is fucking laughable. Im not sure what would be sadder, them knowing its an outright lie or actually believing the bullshit they spewed. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1