Poll of the Day > What's your favourite Grand Theft Auto game?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Krazy_Kirby 07/07/17 2:41:27 AM #52:	you dont have to. there are plenty of other ways of making money like bounty hunting and robbing stores. plus the hiests give large sums --- Kill From The Shadows <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:882475272] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote>you dont have to. there are plenty of other ways of making money like bounty hunting and robbing stores. plus the hiests give large sums</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 07/07/17 2:57:18 AM #53:	Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:882475688] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote>Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AugustDreaming 07/07/17 3:03:00 AM #54:	San Andreas for me but Vice City is a close second. Both of them are fantastic. When I first got Vice City I didn't have a memory card so I'd sit down and play it for 7-8 hours straight to get through it. The game was so charming and fun that it didn't bother me atall. --- Sweet Dreams! http://www.youtube.com/user/AugustDreams <cite>AugustDreaming posted [p:882475821] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote>San Andreas for me but Vice City is a close second. Both of them are fantastic. When I first got Vice City I didn't have a memory card so I'd sit down and play it for 7-8 hours straight to get through it. The game was so charming and fun that it didn't bother me atall.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Xaringan 07/07/17 3:09:42 AM #55:	V --- Sharingan <cite>Xaringan posted [p:882475995] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote>V</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 07/07/17 3:11:41 AM #56:	darkknight109 posted... Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks. so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then --- Kill From The Shadows <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:882476042] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks.</quote> so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 07/07/17 3:34:44 AM #57:	Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks. so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:882476528] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks.</quote> so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then</quote> Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OlorinTheOtaku 07/07/17 3:51:38 AM #58:	I have 3 & san andreas & then on DS chinatown wars & on PSP vice city storys. Out of that my fav is easily San andreas on PC. I watch alot of YT vids of GTA 5 though (people doing crazy stunts & smosh games playing it) that would probably be my favorite if I had it. --- I'm a huge Gamer, Otaku & Geek. Find me on Twitter @OlorinTheOtaku <cite>OlorinTheOtaku posted [p:882476884] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote>I have 3 & san andreas & then on DS chinatown wars & on PSP vice city storys. Out of that my fav is easily San andreas on PC. I watch alot of YT vids of GTA 5 though (people doing crazy stunts & smosh games playing it) that would probably be my favorite if I had it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 07/07/17 5:20:34 AM #59:	darkknight109 posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks. so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game. it isn't. and neither is buying all the properties... this isn't monopoly --- Kill From The Shadows <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:882478526] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks.</quote> so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then</quote> Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game.</quote> it isn't. and neither is buying all the properties... this isn't monopoly</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NejiHyuga900 07/07/17 9:02:15 AM #60:	Vice City, followed by San Andreas. --- Xbox/Windows Gamertag and Nintendo Network ID: TDPNeji PSN and Steam: NejiHyuga900 <cite>NejiHyuga900 posted [p:882483057] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote>Vice City, followed by San Andreas.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrozenBananas 07/07/17 10:01:51 AM #61:	Wtf happened last night?? I went to bed and Vice City was winning by atleast 20 points --- Look at you....you're a bloody puppet!! https://imgur.com/osxzcML <cite>FrozenBananas posted [p:882485087] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote>Wtf happened last night?? I went to bed and Vice City was winning by atleast 20 points</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 07/07/17 10:51:38 AM #62:	Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks. so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game. it isn't. and neither is buying all the properties... this isn't monopoly Yeah, you don't have to buy all the properties. You also don't have to complete any missions or shoot anyone or move - you can just stand there and do nothing. Don't be obtuse - you know full well what I mean. To buy all the properties, you are required to be a stock broker and in a game called "Grand Theft Auto", that's terrible design. I wouldn't mind it nearly as much if there was an alternate way to pick up that cash - like, say, more heists - but there isn't. Not in any reasonable amount of time, at least. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:882487149] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks.</quote> so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then</quote> Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game.</quote> it isn't. and neither is buying all the properties... this isn't monopoly</quote> Yeah, you don't have to buy all the properties. You also don't have to complete any missions or shoot anyone or move - you can just stand there and do nothing. Don't be obtuse - you know full well what I mean. To buy all the properties, you are required to be a stock broker and in a game called "Grand Theft Auto", that's terrible design. I wouldn't mind it nearly as much if there was an alternate way to pick up that cash - like, say, more heists - but there isn't. Not in any reasonable amount of time, at least.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Firewood18 07/07/17 11:08:48 AM #63:	Tommy Vercetti and I were best friends back in the day. --- Nobody is perfect. Well, one guy was but we killed him. <cite>Firewood18 posted [p:882487937] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote>Tommy Vercetti and I were best friends back in the day.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 07/07/17 4:29:10 PM #64:	darkknight109 posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks. so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game. it isn't. and neither is buying all the properties... this isn't monopoly Yeah, you don't have to buy all the properties. You also don't have to complete any missions or shoot anyone or move - you can just stand there and do nothing. Don't be obtuse - you know full well what I mean. To buy all the properties, you are required to be a stock broker and in a game called "Grand Theft Auto", that's terrible design. I wouldn't mind it nearly as much if there was an alternate way to pick up that cash - like, say, more heists - but there isn't. Not in any reasonable amount of time, at least. you can buy a bunch of houses in a game called "Grand Theft Auto" thats a terrible design. --- Kill From The Shadows <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:882504855] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks.</quote> so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then</quote> Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game.</quote> it isn't. and neither is buying all the properties... this isn't monopoly</quote> Yeah, you don't have to buy all the properties. You also don't have to complete any missions or shoot anyone or move - you can just stand there and do nothing. Don't be obtuse - you know full well what I mean. To buy all the properties, you are required to be a stock broker and in a game called "Grand Theft Auto", that's terrible design. I wouldn't mind it nearly as much if there was an alternate way to pick up that cash - like, say, more heists - but there isn't. Not in any reasonable amount of time, at least.</quote> you can buy a bunch of houses in a game called "Grand Theft Auto" thats a terrible design.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
enterthemadrox 07/07/17 4:31:29 PM #65:	Vice City I hated San Andreas and it's all be downhill since then. --- "Normal" is just a setting on the dryer <cite>enterthemadrox posted [p:882504970] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote>Vice City I hated San Andreas and it's all be downhill since then.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 07/07/17 4:50:43 PM #66:	Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks. so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game. it isn't. and neither is buying all the properties... this isn't monopoly Yeah, you don't have to buy all the properties. You also don't have to complete any missions or shoot anyone or move - you can just stand there and do nothing. Don't be obtuse - you know full well what I mean. To buy all the properties, you are required to be a stock broker and in a game called "Grand Theft Auto", that's terrible design. I wouldn't mind it nearly as much if there was an alternate way to pick up that cash - like, say, more heists - but there isn't. Not in any reasonable amount of time, at least. you can buy a bunch of houses in a game called "Grand Theft Auto" thats a terrible design. A couple button presses to buy a house =/= spending hours trading stocks. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:882505936] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks.</quote> so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then</quote> Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game.</quote> it isn't. and neither is buying all the properties... this isn't monopoly</quote> Yeah, you don't have to buy all the properties. You also don't have to complete any missions or shoot anyone or move - you can just stand there and do nothing. Don't be obtuse - you know full well what I mean. To buy all the properties, you are required to be a stock broker and in a game called "Grand Theft Auto", that's terrible design. I wouldn't mind it nearly as much if there was an alternate way to pick up that cash - like, say, more heists - but there isn't. Not in any reasonable amount of time, at least.</quote> you can buy a bunch of houses in a game called "Grand Theft Auto" thats a terrible design.</quote> A couple button presses to buy a house =/= spending hours trading stocks.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 07/07/17 5:07:28 PM #67:	darkknight109 posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks. so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game. it isn't. and neither is buying all the properties... this isn't monopoly Yeah, you don't have to buy all the properties. You also don't have to complete any missions or shoot anyone or move - you can just stand there and do nothing. Don't be obtuse - you know full well what I mean. To buy all the properties, you are required to be a stock broker and in a game called "Grand Theft Auto", that's terrible design. I wouldn't mind it nearly as much if there was an alternate way to pick up that cash - like, say, more heists - but there isn't. Not in any reasonable amount of time, at least. you can buy a bunch of houses in a game called "Grand Theft Auto" thats a terrible design. A couple button presses to buy a house =/= spending hours trading stocks. hours? are you kidding me? just because you didnt take a few minutes to purchase stocks before changing the price during lesters missions (he sends you a message telling you that you can do that) doesn't the feature is bad. --- Kill From The Shadows <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:882506799] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Like I said, I finished every non-repeatable task in the game that could give money; I was still a good ~$75 million dollars shy of being able to afford all of Michael's properties. Making that up through the repeatable options is a non-starter; there's simply no way to bring in that much cash that doesn't involve playing the stocks.</quote> so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then</quote> Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game.</quote> it isn't. and neither is buying all the properties... this isn't monopoly</quote> Yeah, you don't have to buy all the properties. You also don't have to complete any missions or shoot anyone or move - you can just stand there and do nothing. Don't be obtuse - you know full well what I mean. To buy all the properties, you are required to be a stock broker and in a game called "Grand Theft Auto", that's terrible design. I wouldn't mind it nearly as much if there was an alternate way to pick up that cash - like, say, more heists - but there isn't. Not in any reasonable amount of time, at least.</quote> you can buy a bunch of houses in a game called "Grand Theft Auto" thats a terrible design.</quote> A couple button presses to buy a house =/= spending hours trading stocks.</quote> hours? are you kidding me? just because you didnt take a few minutes to purchase stocks before changing the price during lesters missions (he sends you a message telling you that you can do that) doesn't the feature is bad.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 07/07/17 5:58:11 PM #68:	Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game. it isn't. and neither is buying all the properties... this isn't monopoly Yeah, you don't have to buy all the properties. You also don't have to complete any missions or shoot anyone or move - you can just stand there and do nothing. Don't be obtuse - you know full well what I mean. To buy all the properties, you are required to be a stock broker and in a game called "Grand Theft Auto", that's terrible design. I wouldn't mind it nearly as much if there was an alternate way to pick up that cash - like, say, more heists - but there isn't. Not in any reasonable amount of time, at least. you can buy a bunch of houses in a game called "Grand Theft Auto" thats a terrible design. A couple button presses to buy a house =/= spending hours trading stocks. hours? are you kidding me? just because you didnt take a few minutes to purchase stocks before changing the price during lesters missions (he sends you a message telling you that you can do that) doesn't the feature is bad. Which, unless you already have a lot of money at that point, isn't going to make you anywhere near enough cash to purchase the properties at that point. And there's really no reason why the mission couldn't have just given you a big payout instead of making you go through the stock market bullshit. It's adding an extra, completely unnecessary step that does not need to be there. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:882509369] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote> so not being able to get every optional thing without doing an easy optional thing is bad.... ok then</quote> Yes, pretty much. Like I said, I don't play Grand Theft Auto because I enjoy stock market simulators. Partaking in one should not be mandatory for any part of the game.</quote> it isn't. and neither is buying all the properties... this isn't monopoly</quote> Yeah, you don't have to buy all the properties. You also don't have to complete any missions or shoot anyone or move - you can just stand there and do nothing. Don't be obtuse - you know full well what I mean. To buy all the properties, you are required to be a stock broker and in a game called "Grand Theft Auto", that's terrible design. I wouldn't mind it nearly as much if there was an alternate way to pick up that cash - like, say, more heists - but there isn't. Not in any reasonable amount of time, at least.</quote> you can buy a bunch of houses in a game called "Grand Theft Auto" thats a terrible design.</quote> A couple button presses to buy a house =/= spending hours trading stocks.</quote> hours? are you kidding me? just because you didnt take a few minutes to purchase stocks before changing the price during lesters missions (he sends you a message telling you that you can do that) doesn't the feature is bad.</quote> Which, unless you already have a lot of money at that point, isn't going to make you anywhere near enough cash to purchase the properties at that point. And there's really no reason why the mission couldn't have just given you a big payout instead of making you go through the stock market bullshit. It's adding an extra, completely unnecessary step that does not need to be there.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
minervo 07/09/17 6:34:45 PM #69:	Interesting poll result. Vice city and San Andreas have tied at 36 points each, with GTA5 not far behind at 28 points. GTA3 and GTA4 have tied with 10 points each. <cite>minervo posted [p:882616126] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote>Interesting poll result. Vice city and San Andreas have tied at 36 points each, with GTA5 not far behind at 28 points. GTA3 and GTA4 have tied with 10 points each.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pedro45 07/10/17 2:20:41 PM #70:	great poll. i wonder what other gta games got the two votes...LCS or maybe VCS. I really dug LCS. Maybe GTA London. GTA was a blast, but i can see why it's not too highly voted upon with GTA 2 improving everything almost. --- Warning: Sometimes biased http://i.imgur.com/V0x5fw8.jpg http://i.imgur.com/IOovUge.gif http://i.imgur.com/zw7bqPH.jpg <cite>pedro45 posted [p:882662944] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote>great poll. i wonder what other gta games got the two votes...LCS or maybe VCS. I really dug LCS. Maybe GTA London. GTA was a blast, but i can see why it's not too highly voted upon with GTA 2 improving everything almost.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ParanoidObsessive 07/10/17 6:19:12 PM #71:	Krazy_Kirby posted... you can buy a bunch of houses in a game called "Grand Theft Auto" thats a terrible design. By that logic, the fact that you can fly planes, drive boats, and shoot guns is also bad design. As is muggings, heists, gun battles, and literally everything else that people who actually enjoy playing the games like about them. And for that matter, even when it comes to cars, things like racing them, modding them, or even jumping them off the side of a mountain for shits and giggles would all be off the table, because while that at least meets the "auto" criteria, none of that is really "grand thefting". If we shat on games for not exclusively offering a literal and nothing else, about half of all games ever made (if not more) would have to cease to exist. Including a lot of otherwise extremely well-regarded ones. --- "Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76 "POwned again." --- blight family <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted [p:882676599] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>you can buy a bunch of houses in a game called "Grand Theft Auto" thats a terrible design.</quote> By that logic, the fact that you can fly planes, drive boats, and shoot guns is also bad design. As is muggings, heists, gun battles, and literally everything else that people who actually enjoy playing the games like about them. And for that matter, even when it comes to cars, things like racing them, modding them, or even jumping them off the side of a mountain for shits and giggles would all be off the table, because while that at least meets the "auto" criteria, none of that is really "grand thefting". If we shat on games for not exclusively offering a literal and nothing else, about half of all games ever made (if not more) would have to cease to exist. Including a lot of otherwise extremely well-regarded ones. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > What's your favourite Grand Theft Auto game? (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > What's your favourite Grand Theft Auto game?