Current Events > i am so so worried about rdr 2

(+) Yeah! (+)

I just cant get excited for it. I loved the first one, but current practice in industry gonna ruin it. I am calling it.

It will have multiplayer, which will be the main nest of microtransaction and lootboxes. My worry is they will find a,way yo incorporate them into the single player, it will be so chopped up and basic.

Plus rockstar head honcho left last year, probably because he dont wanna deal with these shit or the execs feel he is gonna be in the way of implementing it and axed him.

It is take 2, the publisher behind all of these crao, back fron evolve, colonial marines and recent nba2k which is riddled with crapass lootboxes and microtransaction.
---

it's a video game

Railroad bonds
---

UnholyMudcrab posted...

Railroad bonds

L o o t b o x e s
---

Yeah we'll never get another DLC like Undead Nightmare again but I can guarantee Rockstar is going to make an amazing world and campaign like usual, even, if they focus on multiplayer exclusively after the launch.
---

As long as that shit is contained in multiplayer, and doesn't take development time out of the main game, it should be fine... but who am i kidding, just look at GTA V...
---

i'm just mad that it's a prequel
---

If RDR Online pulls a GTAO, I'm just gonna rev up a mod menu this time

I vaguely remember the multiplayer in the first game but hopefully it's more like that
---

I'm pretty sure RDR had multiplayer, no?
---

_Near_ posted...

i'm just mad that it's a prequel

I mean, there's no way it possibly could have been a sequel. RDR ended right on the cusp of World War I
---

_Near_ posted...

i'm just mad that it's a prequel

As opposed on what? A sequel? RDR already took place in a dying West, that was the entire point. It wouldn't even really be much of a western if it followed his son.
The only options were prequel or just an unrelated Red Dead 3.
---

I'd prefer an entirely new story. Doesn't have to be a sequel, either. Just a new game with new characters. I know, revolutionary, isn't it.
---

_Near_ posted...

I'd prefer an entirely new story. Doesn't have to be a sequel, either. Just a new game with new characters. I know, revolutionary, isn't it.

Then what you're saying is that you didn't want a Red Dead Redemption 2.
---

Cookie Bag posted...

As long as that shit is contained in multiplayer, and doesn't take development time out of the main game, it should be fine... but who am i kidding, just look at GTA V...

But GTA V was in development for a long time and the single player was good and microtransaction-free...
---

Get ready to buy those Miner Cards
---

Gamer99z posted...

Red Dead Redemption 2.

I guess.

Maybe like a Red Dead Reloaded
or Red Dead Revolution
or Red Dead Revengeance

Like, Red Dead Redemption was the perfect self-contained story. It didn't need anymore. Other than undead nightmare which was brilliant.
---