Current Events > attn: american gun owners, if your community banned guns, would you obey?

Topic List	Page List: 1
Kombucha 04/06/18 5:47:20 PM #1:	assuming your community banned firearms and requested they be surrendered, would you obey? - Results (12 votes) yes, i am a law abiding gun owner. 0% (0 votes) 0 no, i would join a militia and revolt immediately 0% (0 votes) 0 no, i would horde my guns inside and nobody would know until it was time to strike. 83.33% (10 votes) 10 no, but i wouldn't have any intention of joining a violent revolution. 16.67% (2 votes) 2 https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/05/us/deerfield-illinois-assault-weapon-ban-trnd/index.html An Illinois town just banned assault weapons. The penalty if you keep one? Up to $1,000 a day Objections, as you might imagine, have come in spades. On Thursday morning the Illinois State Rifle Association announced that they and the Second Amendment Foundation had jointly filed a lawsuit against the Village of Deerfield. "They are blatantly violating state law and they are violating the Second Amendment," says Richard Pearson, executive director of the Illinois State Rifle Association. He told CNN the ISRA has been receiving waves of calls from people upset over the ban and is confident the ISRA's legal challenge will prevail. "The penalties are just draconian," he says. "A guy -- or a lady -- who owns a large-capacity magazine or anything like that could owe thousands of dollars, and if they cross the thin, almost invisible line between municipalities, they could be considered a criminal." --- http://www.last.fm/user/walkingishonest <cite>Kombucha posted [p:899179234] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote> assuming your community banned firearms and requested they be surrendered, would you obey? - Results (12 votes) yes, i am a law abiding gun owner. 0% (0 votes) 0 no, i would join a militia and revolt immediately 0% (0 votes) 0 no, i would horde my guns inside and nobody would know until it was time to strike. 83.33% (10 votes) 10 no, but i wouldn't have any intention of joining a violent revolution. 16.67% (2 votes) 2 https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/05/us/deerfield-illinois-assault-weapon-ban-trnd/index.html An Illinois town just banned assault weapons. The penalty if you keep one? Up to $1,000 a day <quote>Objections, as you might imagine, have come in spades. On Thursday morning the Illinois State Rifle Association announced that they and the Second Amendment Foundation had jointly filed a lawsuit against the Village of Deerfield. "They are blatantly violating state law and they are violating the Second Amendment," says Richard Pearson, executive director of the Illinois State Rifle Association. He told CNN the ISRA has been receiving waves of calls from people upset over the ban and is confident the ISRA's legal challenge will prevail. "The penalties are just draconian," he says. "A guy -- or a lady -- who owns a large-capacity magazine or anything like that could owe thousands of dollars, and if they cross the thin, almost invisible line between municipalities, they could be considered a criminal."</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 04/06/18 5:48:25 PM #2:	Deerfield is about to get absolutely destroyed in court. --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:899179297] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote>Deerfield is about to get absolutely destroyed in court.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OmegaShinkai 04/06/18 5:49:33 PM #3:	They specifically banned the SVD lmao If i paid a few thousand to get an actual SVD you bet I'd disobey <cite>OmegaShinkai posted [p:899179365] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote>They specifically banned the SVD lmao If i paid a few thousand to get an actual SVD you bet I'd disobey</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sondast 04/06/18 5:51:17 PM #4:	According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be! --- Take a lesson from parakeets. If you're ever feeling lonely, just eat in front of a mirror. <cite>sondast posted [p:899179461] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 04/06/18 5:52:52 PM #5:	sondast posted... According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be! And if you use them for home defense? --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:899179547] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be!</quote> And if you use them for home defense?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kombucha 04/06/18 5:53:18 PM #6:	sondast posted... According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be! so basically you can technically own the gun but never assemble it. got it. --- http://www.last.fm/user/walkingishonest <cite>Kombucha posted [p:899179571] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be!</quote> so basically you can technically own the gun but never assemble it. got it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gnomefromnome 04/06/18 5:53:52 PM #7:	Im in Alaska, so itll never happen lol --- Oh my God... That was the dumbest collection of dumbosity I've ever seen! - Famine https://youtu.be/pOtTxMC1ZZQ <cite>gnomefromnome posted [p:899179601] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote>Im in Alaska, so itll never happen lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sondast 04/06/18 5:54:26 PM #8:	FLUFFYGERM posted... sondast posted... According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be! And if you use them for home defense? I use my non-automatic shotgun for that. --- Take a lesson from parakeets. If you're ever feeling lonely, just eat in front of a mirror. <cite>sondast posted [p:899179637] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be!</quote> And if you use them for home defense?</quote> I use my non-automatic shotgun for that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Thatuser 04/06/18 5:55:00 PM #9:	What is an "assault weapon"? Any gun can be defined as an assault weapon, as you can assault somebody with them. If they're referencing military weaponry, the public already does not have access to select fire weapons, unless illegally modified. So, again, what is an assault weapon exactly? <cite>Thatuser posted [p:899179671] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote>What is an "assault weapon"? Any gun can be defined as an assault weapon, as you can assault somebody with them. If they're referencing military weaponry, the public already does not have access to select fire weapons, unless illegally modified. So, again, what is an assault weapon exactly?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sondast 04/06/18 5:56:13 PM #10:	Kombucha posted... sondast posted... According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be! so basically you can technically own the gun but never assemble it. got it. So just ignore that part that says you can keep it assembled in a case. Got it. --- Take a lesson from parakeets. If you're ever feeling lonely, just eat in front of a mirror. <cite>sondast posted [p:899179735] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kombucha posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be!</quote> so basically you can technically own the gun but never assemble it. got it.</quote> So just ignore that part that says you can keep it assembled in a case. Got it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 04/06/18 5:56:59 PM #11:	sondast posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... sondast posted... According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be! And if you use them for home defense? I use my non-automatic shotgun for that. So because you use your shotgun for that, other people shouldn't be allowed to use their rifles? --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:899179775] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be!</quote> And if you use them for home defense?</quote> I use my non-automatic shotgun for that.</quote> So because you use your shotgun for that, other people shouldn't be allowed to use their rifles?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kombucha 04/06/18 5:57:32 PM #12:	sondast posted... Kombucha posted... sondast posted... According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be! so basically you can technically own the gun but never assemble it. got it. So just ignore that part that says you can keep it assembled in a case. Got it. so if you take it out of the case it has to be disassembled immediately? rofl --- http://www.last.fm/user/walkingishonest <cite>Kombucha posted [p:899179806] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kombucha posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be!</quote> so basically you can technically own the gun but never assemble it. got it.</quote> So just ignore that part that says you can keep it assembled in a case. Got it.</quote> so if you take it out of the case it has to be disassembled immediately? rofl</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 04/06/18 5:58:17 PM #13:	sondast posted... According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be! That was declared unconstitutional in Heller --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:899179840] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be!</quote> That was declared unconstitutional in Heller</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sondast 04/06/18 6:02:50 PM #14:	FLUFFYGERM posted... sondast posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... sondast posted... According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be! And if you use them for home defense? I use my non-automatic shotgun for that. So because you use your shotgun for that, other people shouldn't be allowed to use their rifles? Anyone that owns an AR15 would have many other options for home defense. --- Take a lesson from parakeets. If you're ever feeling lonely, just eat in front of a mirror. <cite>sondast posted [p:899180057] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be!</quote> And if you use them for home defense?</quote> I use my non-automatic shotgun for that.</quote> So because you use your shotgun for that, other people shouldn't be allowed to use their rifles?</quote> Anyone that owns an AR15 would have many other options for home defense.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sondast 04/06/18 6:05:40 PM #15:	Kombucha posted... sondast posted... Kombucha posted... sondast posted... According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be! so basically you can technically own the gun but never assemble it. got it. So just ignore that part that says you can keep it assembled in a case. Got it. so if you take it out of the case it has to be disassembled immediately? rofl It sounds like if the owner wants to keep put it somewhere in the house unattended, then yeah they should disassemble it right away. --- Take a lesson from parakeets. If you're ever feeling lonely, just eat in front of a mirror. <cite>sondast posted [p:899180195] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kombucha posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kombucha posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be!</quote> so basically you can technically own the gun but never assemble it. got it.</quote> So just ignore that part that says you can keep it assembled in a case. Got it.</quote> so if you take it out of the case it has to be disassembled immediately? rofl</quote> It sounds like if the owner wants to keep put it somewhere in the house unattended, then yeah they should disassemble it right away.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Thatuser 04/06/18 6:05:45 PM #16:	sondast posted... Anyone that owns an AR15 would have many other options for home defense. What makes you sure of that? Perhaps they sought out and purchased one gun for a specific purpose. <cite>Thatuser posted [p:899180200] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone that owns an AR15 would have many other options for home defense.</quote> What makes you sure of that? Perhaps they sought out and purchased one gun for a specific purpose.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 04/06/18 6:06:01 PM #17:	sondast posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... sondast posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... sondast posted... According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be! And if you use them for home defense? I use my non-automatic shotgun for that. So because you use your shotgun for that, other people shouldn't be allowed to use their rifles? Anyone that owns an AR15 would have many other options for home defense. Like a different semi automatic or a different configuration of AR-15. --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:899180223] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be!</quote> And if you use them for home defense?</quote> I use my non-automatic shotgun for that.</quote> So because you use your shotgun for that, other people shouldn't be allowed to use their rifles?</quote> Anyone that owns an AR15 would have many other options for home defense.</quote> Like a different semi automatic or a different configuration of AR-15.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kombucha 04/06/18 6:06:57 PM #18:	sondast posted... Kombucha posted... sondast posted... Kombucha posted... sondast posted... According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be! so basically you can technically own the gun but never assemble it. got it. So just ignore that part that says you can keep it assembled in a case. Got it. so if you take it out of the case it has to be disassembled immediately? rofl It sounds like if the owner wants to keep put it somewhere in the house unattended, then yeah they should disassemble it right away. they should be able to carry it around assembled in full public view, as the constitution permits. --- http://www.last.fm/user/walkingishonest <cite>Kombucha posted [p:899180276] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kombucha posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kombucha posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sondast posted...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. Oh no, now I have to lock up my rifles like the responsible gun owner I claim to be!</quote> so basically you can technically own the gun but never assemble it. got it.</quote> So just ignore that part that says you can keep it assembled in a case. Got it.</quote> so if you take it out of the case it has to be disassembled immediately? rofl</quote> It sounds like if the owner wants to keep put it somewhere in the house unattended, then yeah they should disassemble it right away.</quote> they should be able to carry it around assembled in full public view, as the constitution permits.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 04/06/18 6:07:04 PM #19:	No. I would move and file a lawsuit --- I have a gamefaqs following. Watch them flock to my posts. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:899180281] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote>No. I would move and file a lawsuit</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Buzz Killjoy 04/06/18 6:08:31 PM #20:	I would cosmoline and vacuum seal my non-compliant firearms and bury them. I don't know yet exactly what form of gun control I'm willing to concede and accept, but it isn't banning things that were sold legally in the past, that's for sure. Edit: I missed the word "community" in the topic title. If this was just a local or municipal statute, I would relocate. --- *Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?* <cite>Buzz Killjoy posted [p:899180352] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote>I would cosmoline and vacuum seal my non-compliant firearms and bury them. I don't know yet exactly what form of gun control I'm willing to concede and accept, but it isn't banning things that were sold legally in the past, that's for sure. Edit: I missed the word "community" in the topic title. If this was just a local or municipal statute, I would relocate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scorpion41 04/06/18 6:09:25 PM #21:	Whos going to enforce this? Unless they plan on violating the 4th amendment no one will know if a person is following the law. And the first time they try to enforce it they will get destroyed in court. Deerfield lost their damn minds. --- PSN: scorpion_4160 Currently Playing: NCAA 14, Darksiders series(PS3) <cite>scorpion41 posted [p:899180408] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote>Whos going to enforce this? Unless they plan on violating the 4th amendment no one will know if a person is following the law. And the first time they try to enforce it they will get destroyed in court. Deerfield lost their damn minds.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kombucha 04/06/18 10:36:31 PM #22:	up --- http://www.last.fm/user/walkingishonest <cite>Kombucha posted [p:899194115] in attn: amer... [t:76491579]...</cite> <quote>up</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > attn: american gun owners, if your community banned guns, would you obey? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > attn: american gun owners, if your community banned guns, would you obey?