Poll of the Day > Police who WRONGFULLY Killed a Man are NOT LIABLE because he was an ILLEGAL!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

The family of a man shot in the HEAD by Mississippi police officers went into the wrong house to investigate a domestic abuse in 2017 are NOT liable for his death he was an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT as the city lawyer said he HAD NO RIGHTS!!

In a shockingly blunt legal brief, lawyers for the city of Southaven also accuse the man's widow of being married to multiple men.

They say even if it was the city's fault he died,the pair have no protection under the 14th amendment of the US constitution because neither is a US citizen.

Ismael Lopez was shot and killed by a police officer who showed up pounding on his door in July 2017 after receiving a call of a report of domestic incident and mistakenly went to his house.

Claudia Linares denies the police claim that her husband stuck a gun out of the door and then closed it as neighbors said the cops shot thorugh the door and struck him at the back of the head and died immediately

The cops involved were never named and they were not required to wear body cameras as a grand jury decided NOT to indict them after looking at the evidence

His widow has filed a wrongful death suit and the city filed an argument that they were not liable

Blonde Whacko, Katherine S. Kerby, the city's lawyer questioned the victim's "alleged wife" and said she had been married to 2 other men and called the victim a FUGITIVE ANYWAY who ignored several deportation orders

She said "If he ever had 4th Amendment or 14th Amendment civil rights, they were lost by his own conduct and misconduct. Ismael Lopez may have been a person on American soil but he was not one of the 'we the people of the united states' entitled to the civil rights invoked in this lawsuit"

Linares lawyers were stunned by the language used as Murray Wells said it was "chilling"of how she described the man and said her argument might as well have been "stormtroopers can come into your house and kill you if you are an undocumented immigrant and getting away with murder".

Aaron Neglia, another lawyer said it was a real shame that they used these tactics to soil someone's name when they lost their partner as Linares had a marriage certificate dated 2003 to prove their claims

The Supreme Court has routinely ruled that people in the US are protected and entitled to basic human rights regardless of their immigration status

Ismael (Deceased) and his Wife -





Protest -



Where they lived -







Katherine - Wicked Wench of the West


---

She's completely wrong, legally and morally, and this is disgusting

mrduckbear posted...

Claudia Linares denies the police claim that her husband stuck a gun out of the door and then closed it as neighbors said the cops shot through the door and struck him at the back of the head and died immediately

The cops involved were never named and they were not required to wear body cameras as a grand jury decided NOT to indict them after looking at the evidence

Okay so which is it? Even if a grand jury reviews evidence, that is not a reason someone wasnt PREVIOUSLY already wearing body cams. What is the evidence they looked at then if it wasnt body camera footage?

Anyway if he did stick a gun out the door at them then it doesnt matter whether or not he was a US citizen, he still would have been shot.
---

This just in, rights are really revocable privileges.
---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veNG0jbGz9Q" data-time="

---

Realtalk:

Hypothetical... Police kill a suspect during a crime and the police, while certain in their own defence, are found to have wrongfully used too much force. However. it is discovered the suspect is a foreign national who is part of a business entourage (A Chinese CEO's lawyer or something)... so they aren't citizens, and they aren't illegal immigrants either.

Are they liable?
---

The police were wrong to break into the wrong house and murder someone who was, in all probability, trying to defend his home from intruders (stand your ground, anyone?). It makes no difference if the person is a legal citizen or not. Either you value all human life or none; there's no middle ground in this discussion. In this case, it appears that neither the police nor the city's lawyer values ANY human life, in which case they'll eventually reap the whirlwind of the seeds that they've sown.

Killing someone wrongfully is always wrong, police or civilian.
---

Its still a human life.
I like how we can tell your view on the subject just by how you write the story, Ducky.
---

This is super dangerous logic. What if a tourist is wrongfully killed. It sets up too many slippery slopes.

ASlaveObeys posted...

This is super dangerous logic. What if a tourist is wrongfully killed. It sets up too many slippery slopes.

Yes. But even when they are illegals, they're still human beings with basic human rights, and the U.S. is still (supposedly) a first world country.
If our domestic laws don't apply* to his treatment, then his home country should be able to drag those responsible in front of the Hague or other international court to demand justice, honestly.

*Again, they do and she's completely fucking wrong, but...just to examine the alternative view and logical conclusion it leads to

Fierce_Deity_08 posted...

Its still a human life.
I like how we can tell your view on the subject just by how you write the story, Ducky.

---