hispanic adults started legally carrying guns.

Topic List	Page List: 1
UnfairRepresent 12/04/20 2:41:11 AM #1:	How quickly would the right demand strict gun control? 3 minutes 3 days 3 weeks 3 months 3 years A decade They never would. How quickly would the right demand strict gun control? - Results (37 votes) 3 minutes 43.24% (16 votes) 16 3 days 13.51% (5 votes) 5 3 weeks 8.11% (3 votes) 3 3 months 8.11% (3 votes) 3 3 years 0% (0 votes) 0 A decade 0% (0 votes) 0 They never would. 27.03% (10 votes) 10 How quickly would the right demand strict gun control? Topic might be confusing to non Swiss Europeans. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:947903720] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote> How quickly would the right demand strict gun control? 3 minutes 3 days 3 weeks 3 months 3 years A decade They never would. Vote View Results How quickly would the right demand strict gun control? - Results (37 votes) 3 minutes 43.24% (16 votes) 16 3 days 13.51% (5 votes) 5 3 weeks 8.11% (3 votes) 3 3 months 8.11% (3 votes) 3 3 years 0% (0 votes) 0 A decade 0% (0 votes) 0 They never would. 27.03% (10 votes) 10 Show Voting Form How quickly would the right demand strict gun control? Topic might be confusing to non Swiss Europeans. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ModLogic 12/04/20 2:45:11 AM #2:	if 87% of black athletes decided to no longer rep america, the country would change to cater to their demands in a week. --- https://imgur.com/ZngbqJn https://imgur.com/lbSi0U3 https://imgur.com/xaRYKZM <cite>ModLogic posted [p:947903769] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>if 87% of black athletes decided to no longer rep america, the country would change to cater to their demands in a week. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kolibri X 12/04/20 2:45:54 AM #3:	Legally? --- Platinum GameFAQs Member <cite>Kolibri X posted [p:947903779] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>Legally? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 12/04/20 2:48:23 AM #4:	Kolibri X posted... Legally? Legally --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:947903813] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>Kolibri X posted... </cite> <quote>Legally?</quote> Legally </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
yutterh 12/04/20 2:49:39 AM #5:	3 minutes to try and put a ban on anyone not white. --- MICHALECOLE is the greatest poster of all time I have literally watched him bang my mom before <cite>yutterh posted [p:947903831] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>3 minutes to try and put a ban on anyone not white. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheBiggerWiggle 12/04/20 2:50:24 AM #6:	Dave Chapelle already made this joke. --- I have trouble concentrating because I have 80HD. <cite>TheBiggerWiggle posted [p:947903841] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>Dave Chapelle already made this joke. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 12/04/20 2:54:47 AM #7:	TheBiggerWiggle posted... Dave Chapelle already made this joke. It's not really a joke. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:947903909] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>TheBiggerWiggle posted... </cite> <quote>Dave Chapelle already made this joke.</quote>It's not really a joke. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
yutterh 12/04/20 2:58:17 AM #8:	UnfairRepresent posted... It's not really a joke. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act It is a joke but in a not so funny way, if you know what I mean. --- MICHALECOLE is the greatest poster of all time I have literally watched him bang my mom before <cite>yutterh posted [p:947903968] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite> <quote>It's not really a joke. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act</quote> It is a joke but in a not so funny way, if you know what I mean. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
omega cookie 12/04/20 3:22:06 AM #9:	I've heard variations of this being talked about by rednecks in bars and such, and they actually have an answer to this, at least they think they do. Require a high school deploma to obtain a gun permit, GED's being barred. Should that not "get it under control" as I've heard it put, require a college diploma because, quote, "I'd be fucked but at least my kids would have guns". Never heard them try to figure out how this would work with the second amendment, but you don't eavesdrop on rednecks to find sage advice, only a good laugh. Though, it might actually be worth seeing happen, if only for the complete mindfuck of watching conservatives fight against the second amendment, and democrats fight for it. --- FFRK: BRKB - Eiko - Guardian Mog <cite>omega cookie posted [p:947904299] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>I've heard variations of this being talked about by rednecks in bars and such, and they actually have an answer to this, at least they think they do. Require a high school deploma to obtain a gun permit, GED's being barred. Should that not "get it under control" as I've heard it put, require a college diploma because, quote, "I'd be fucked but at least my kids would have guns". Never heard them try to figure out how this would work with the second amendment, but you don't eavesdrop on rednecks to find sage advice, only a good laugh. Though, it might actually be worth seeing happen, if only for the complete mindfuck of watching conservatives fight against the second amendment, and democrats fight for it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
545x39 12/04/20 3:38:04 AM #10:	Gun control and racism has long gone hand in hand in this country so not long probably, which is sad. omega cookie posted... lmao, this didn't happen --- Freya weeps upon her golden throne. https://imgur.com/aXjQJkU <cite>545x39 posted [p:947904504] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>Gun control and racism has long gone hand in hand in this country so not long probably, which is sad. omega cookie posted... </cite> lmao, this didn't happen </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Malcrasternus 12/04/20 3:39:08 AM #11:	UnfairRepresent posted... It's not really a joke. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act Assembly Bill 1591 was introduced by Don Mulford (R) from Oakland on April 5th, 1967, and subsequently co-sponsored by John T. Knox (D) from Richmond, Walter J. Karabian (D) from Monterey Park, Frank Murphy Jr. (R) from Santa Cruz, Alan Sieroty (D) from Los Angeles, and William M. Ketchum (R) from Bakersfield,[6]. AB-1591 was made an urgency statute under Article IV, 8(d) of the Constitution of California after an organized band of men armed with loaded firearms [...] entered the Capitol on May 2nd, 1967;[7] as such, it required a 2/3 majority in each house. It passed the Assembly (controlled by Democrats 42:38) at subsequent readings, passed the Senate (controlled by Democrats, 20:19) on July 26th by 29 votes to 7[8], and was signed by Governor Ronald Reagan on July 28th, 1967. The law banned the carrying of loaded weapons in public.[9] So three Republicans, three Democrats as co-sponsors, passed Dem controlled Assembly and Senate, then signed by Reagan. Literally both sides, hm. --- 4/15/1951 - 3/18/2014 <cite>Malcrasternus posted [p:947904522] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite> <quote>It's not really a joke. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act</quote>Assembly Bill 1591 was introduced by Don Mulford (R) from Oakland on April 5th, 1967, and subsequently co-sponsored by John T. Knox (D) from Richmond, Walter J. Karabian (D) from Monterey Park, Frank Murphy Jr. (R) from Santa Cruz, Alan Sieroty (D) from Los Angeles, and William M. Ketchum (R) from Bakersfield,[6]. AB-1591 was made an urgency statute under Article IV, 8(d) of the Constitution of California after an organized band of men armed with loaded firearms [...] entered the Capitol on May 2nd, 1967;[7] as such, it required a 2/3 majority in each house. It passed the Assembly (controlled by Democrats 42:38) at subsequent readings, passed the Senate (controlled by Democrats, 20:19) on July 26th by 29 votes to 7[8], and was signed by Governor Ronald Reagan on July 28th, 1967. The law banned the carrying of loaded weapons in public.[9] So three Republicans, three Democrats as co-sponsors, passed Dem controlled Assembly and Senate, then signed by Reagan. Literally both sides, hm. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Omasitor Hain 12/04/20 3:39:26 AM #12:	Yih teft ya mimmopluft. All that, yesterday. <cite>Omasitor Hain posted [p:947904530] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>Yih teft ya mimmopluft. All that, yesterday.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#13	Post #13 was unavailable or deleted.
UnfairRepresent 12/04/20 3:41:03 AM #14:	Malcrasternus posted... Assembly Bill 1591 was introduced by Don Mulford (R) from Oakland on April 5th, 1967, and subsequently co-sponsored by John T. Knox (D) from Richmond, Walter J. Karabian (D) from Monterey Park, Frank Murphy Jr. (R) from Santa Cruz, Alan Sieroty (D) from Los Angeles, and William M. Ketchum (R) from Bakersfield,[6]. AB-1591 was made an urgency statute under Article IV, 8(d) of the Constitution of California after an organized band of men armed with loaded firearms [...] entered the Capitol on May 2nd, 1967;[7] as such, it required a 2/3 majority in each house. It passed the Assembly (controlled by Democrats 42:38) at subsequent readings, passed the Senate (controlled by Democrats, 20:19) on July 26th by 29 votes to 7[8], and was signed by Governor Ronald Reagan on July 28th, 1967. The law banned the carrying of loaded weapons in public.[9] So three Republicans, three Democrats as co-sponsors, passed Dem controlled Assembly and Senate, then signed by Reagan. Literally both sides, hm. Both sides doesn't work here (althought it never does) when Dems are always calling for Gun Control and Republicans aren't. That's the point. It became "Both sides" when black guys started carrying. Until then and since it was one side --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:947904550] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>Malcrasternus posted... </cite> <quote>Assembly Bill 1591 was introduced by Don Mulford (R) from Oakland on April 5th, 1967, and subsequently co-sponsored by John T. Knox (D) from Richmond, Walter J. Karabian (D) from Monterey Park, Frank Murphy Jr. (R) from Santa Cruz, Alan Sieroty (D) from Los Angeles, and William M. Ketchum (R) from Bakersfield,[6]. AB-1591 was made an urgency statute under Article IV, 8(d) of the Constitution of California after an organized band of men armed with loaded firearms [...] entered the Capitol on May 2nd, 1967;[7] as such, it required a 2/3 majority in each house. It passed the Assembly (controlled by Democrats 42:38) at subsequent readings, passed the Senate (controlled by Democrats, 20:19) on July 26th by 29 votes to 7[8], and was signed by Governor Ronald Reagan on July 28th, 1967. The law banned the carrying of loaded weapons in public.[9] So three Republicans, three Democrats as co-sponsors, passed Dem controlled Assembly and Senate, then signed by Reagan. Literally both sides, hm.</quote>Both sides doesn't work here (althought it never does) when Dems are always calling for Gun Control and Republicans aren't. That's the point. It became "Both sides" when black guys started carrying. Until then and since it was one side </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mech dragon 12/04/20 3:42:41 AM #15:	The question is not how fast but how many Karens would demand it --- Insta: @acboyfriends ACNH Dream Address: DA-4948-4080-7418 ~enjoy your visit~ <cite>mech dragon posted [p:947904563] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>The question is not how fast but how many Karens would demand it </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FL81 12/04/20 3:43:38 AM #16:	UnfairRepresent posted... Both sides doesn't work here (althought it never does) when Dems are always calling for Gun Control and Republicans aren't. That's the point. It became "Both sides" when black guys started carrying. Until then and since it was one side situational gun control is still pretty bad though ideally everyone should have guns --- Thanks to Proofpyros for the sig images https://imgur.com/Nv4Pi1v https://imgur.com/N43HJYv <cite>FL81 posted [p:947904573] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite> <quote>Both sides doesn't work here (althought it never does) when Dems are always calling for Gun Control and Republicans aren't. That's the point. It became "Both sides" when black guys started carrying. Until then and since it was one side</quote>situational gun control is still pretty bad though ideally everyone should have guns </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 12/04/20 3:47:03 AM #17:	FL81 posted... situational gun control is still pretty bad though ideally everyone should have guns Even Children and lunatics? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:947904609] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>FL81 posted... </cite> <quote>situational gun control is still pretty bad though ideally everyone should have guns</quote>Even Children and lunatics? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nfearurspecimn 12/04/20 3:58:03 AM #18:	Omasitor Hain posted... Yih teft ya mimmopluft. what? --- Wake up. You have to wake up. currently a preta/hungry ghost Dai Grepher: I was wrong. My entire theory is incorrect. Zero Mission IS a remake of Metroid. <cite>nfearurspecimn posted [p:947904731] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>Omasitor Hain posted... </cite> <quote>Yih teft ya mimmopluft.</quote>what? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
yutterh 12/04/20 4:01:00 AM #19:	UnfairRepresent posted... Even Children and lunatics? Especially lunatic children --- MICHALECOLE is the greatest poster of all time I have literally watched him bang my mom before <cite>yutterh posted [p:947904771] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite> <quote>Even Children and lunatics?</quote> Especially lunatic children </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Middle hope 12/04/20 4:06:55 AM #20:	There already is strict gun control --- https://imgur.com/iQep35u https://imgur.com/nhHkg9L https://imgur.com/mwTy0iF https://imgur.com/FCER80e <cite>Middle hope posted [p:947904853] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>There already is strict gun control </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Omasitor Hain 12/04/20 4:08:59 AM #21:	nfearurspecimn posted... what? Exactly. We hate the not us. <cite>Omasitor Hain posted [p:947904876] in If 87% of ... [t:79151795]...</cite> <quote>nfearurspecimn posted...</cite> <quote> what? </quote> Exactly. We hate the not us.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > If 87% of black/hispanic adults started legally carrying guns. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > If 87% of black/hispanic adults started legally carrying guns.