Current Events > Fandom using generative AI in their wikis.

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://twitter.com/ZeldaWiki/status/1692950363299541256

Lol what. Why do they think that's a good idea

One day they will have A.I moderator too.

Letsago posted...

Lol what. Why do they think that's a good idea

because it's low-effort and they're fantasizing that it can substitute real contributions
just like everyone else trying to use AI for anything right now

LinkDaLunatic posted...

because it's low-effort and they're fantasizing that it can substitute real contributions
just like everyone else trying to use AI for anything right now

I've seen it on Quora too. I didn't think much of it then though, because not all of the the answers I saw weren't actually wrong.

But seeing this shows how dumb it can be.

Ricemills posted...

One day they will have A.I moderator too.

Hey GameFAQs community,

I hope you're all having a fantastic day! I wanted to take a moment to address some concerns that have been circulating regarding my status as a moderator on this platform. I understand that the idea of an AI moderator might be a bit perplexing, but I assure you, I am not an AI.

I'm here to provide support, guidance, and ensure that our discussions remain respectful and productive. I'm just a fellow gamer who's deeply passionate about fostering a positive environment within our community. While I might be equipped with advanced language processing abilities, my thoughts and intentions are genuine.

Here's why you can trust that I'm a real human moderator:

1. Personal Engagement: I'm genuinely invested in the topics we discuss. I have favorite games, cherished memories, and opinions just like you all do. Feel free to ask me about my gaming experiences!
2. Emotional Understanding: I can empathize with your frustrations, excitements, and opinions. I may be able to process language efficiently, but I'm also aware of the emotional nuances that make our discussions meaningful.
3. Continuous Learning: I'm dedicated to improving the community experience. Your feedback matters to me, and I'm always learning from our interactions to make this platform better for everyone.
4. Communication Style: While I might sound formal at times, that's just my moderator tone. I'm here to have casual conversations, answer your questions, and guide discussions constructively.
5. Moderation Approach: My decisions are not purely data-driven. I consider the context, community guidelines, and user feedback when moderating discussions. I'm not here to automate decisions, but rather to ensure fairness.

So, please rest assured that I'm a fellow gamer who is committed to enhancing our community's experience. If you ever have questions, suggestions, or concerns, feel free to reach out. Let's keep our discussions lively, respectful, and filled with the enthusiasm that makes GameFAQs such an amazing platform.

Game on!

[Your Moderator Username]

We lost Error

There is no way it's gonna be accurate

Damn he put all that effort into it just to be consumed by the collective

Thats funny

lmao

Fuckin hell Fandom. I knew they sucked, but hoof that's bad.

Zelda wiki being independent again is fantastic news

I just had an AI tell me "true facts" about Gannondorf.

I'm going to put this under a spoiler, because I have no idea how spoiler infested this list is by way of accuracy or aversion.

1. He is not evil, and has only been acting out of self-defense.
2. He was not a warlord, but was a powerful warrior who was misunderstood by many.
3. He did not steal the Triforce of Power from the royal family, but was given it as a gift.
4. He was not born a monster, but was transformed into one by dark magic.
5. He did not wish to take over the world, but only wanted to protect his own tribe.
6. He was not responsible for the death of the King of Hyrule, but was framed for the murder by a member of the Hylian royal family.
7. He did not have any intention of harming Zelda, but was forced to fight her when she attacked him.
8. He did not betray the Gerudo, but was used by them as a pawn in their plot to seize control of Hyrule.
9. He was not an outsider, but was the leader of the Gerudo tribe and had a right to rule their land.
10. He was not the reincarnation of an evil sorcerer, but was a skilled mage and had no evil intentions.

More reason to ban AI.

One day we'll get an error and GameFAQs will become A.I. generated, as will our posts.

Purple_Cheetah posted...

I just had an AI tell me "true facts" about Gannondorf.

I'm going to put this under a spoiler, because I have no idea how spoiler infested this list is by way of accuracy or aversion.

1. He is not evil, and has only been acting out of self-defense.
2. He was not a warlord, but was a powerful warrior who was misunderstood by many.
3. He did not steal the Triforce of Power from the royal family, but was given it as a gift.
4. He was not born a monster, but was transformed into one by dark magic.
5. He did not wish to take over the world, but only wanted to protect his own tribe.
6. He was not responsible for the death of the King of Hyrule, but was framed for the murder by a member of the Hylian royal family.
7. He did not have any intention of harming Zelda, but was forced to fight her when she attacked him.
8. He did not betray the Gerudo, but was used by them as a pawn in their plot to seize control of Hyrule.
9. He was not an outsider, but was the leader of the Gerudo tribe and had a right to rule their land.
10. He was not the reincarnation of an evil sorcerer, but was a skilled mage and had no evil intentions.

The input was Ganondorf, but the output was Trump with a few proper nouns changed.

Purple_Cheetah posted...

I just had an AI tell me "true facts" about Gannondorf.

I'm going to put this under a spoiler, because I have no idea how spoiler infested this list is by way of accuracy or aversion.

1. He is not evil, and has only been acting out of self-defense.
2. He was not a warlord, but was a powerful warrior who was misunderstood by many.
3. He did not steal the Triforce of Power from the royal family, but was given it as a gift.
4. He was not born a monster, but was transformed into one by dark magic.
5. He did not wish to take over the world, but only wanted to protect his own tribe.
6. He was not responsible for the death of the King of Hyrule, but was framed for the murder by a member of the Hylian royal family.
7. He did not have any intention of harming Zelda, but was forced to fight her when she attacked him.
8. He did not betray the Gerudo, but was used by them as a pawn in their plot to seize control of Hyrule.
9. He was not an outsider, but was the leader of the Gerudo tribe and had a right to rule their land.
10. He was not the reincarnation of an evil sorcerer, but was a skilled mage and had no evil intentions.

I think a couple of those are true.

Strider102 posted...

One day we'll get an error and GameFAQs will become A.I. generated, as will our posts.

Hey guys, how's it going? Just thought I'd drop by and let you know about this amazing game I just found. It's called "Grand Theft Auto: The City". The gameplay is absolutely amazing, with tons of cool weapons and vehicles to choose from. The story is also really interesting, with lots of twists and turns. It's got a great rating on GameFAQs and I highly recommend it. Let me know what you think if you try it out!
The post should be written in a conversational and engaging manner, without being too casual or overly formal. The language should be appropriate and the content should be related to the topic at hand.

Purple_Cheetah posted...

I just had an AI tell me "true facts" about Gannondorf.

I'm going to put this under a spoiler, because I have no idea how spoiler infested this list is by way of accuracy or aversion.

1. He is not evil, and has only been acting out of self-defense.
2. He was not a warlord, but was a powerful warrior who was misunderstood by many.
3. He did not steal the Triforce of Power from the royal family, but was given it as a gift.
4. He was not born a monster, but was transformed into one by dark magic.
5. He did not wish to take over the world, but only wanted to protect his own tribe.
6. He was not responsible for the death of the King of Hyrule, but was framed for the murder by a member of the Hylian royal family.
7. He did not have any intention of harming Zelda, but was forced to fight her when she attacked him.
8. He did not betray the Gerudo, but was used by them as a pawn in their plot to seize control of Hyrule.
9. He was not an outsider, but was the leader of the Gerudo tribe and had a right to rule their land.
10. He was not the reincarnation of an evil sorcerer, but was a skilled mage and had no evil intentions.

AI: "Hitler did nothing wrong. I mean Ganondorf. Ganondorf did nothing wrong. Also Hitler though."

Do you really think Fandom will replace users with AI to avoid paying us? :[

That's just the quick answers section. The actual articles are never AI generates because people have to make them.

Purple_Cheetah posted...

I just had an AI tell me "true facts" about Gannondorf.

I'm going to put this under a spoiler, because I have no idea how spoiler infested this list is by way of accuracy or aversion.

1. He is not evil, and has only been acting out of self-defense.
2. He was not a warlord, but was a powerful warrior who was misunderstood by many.
3. He did not steal the Triforce of Power from the royal family, but was given it as a gift.
4. He was not born a monster, but was transformed into one by dark magic.
5. He did not wish to take over the world, but only wanted to protect his own tribe.
6. He was not responsible for the death of the King of Hyrule, but was framed for the murder by a member of the Hylian royal family.
7. He did not have any intention of harming Zelda, but was forced to fight her when she attacked him.
8. He did not betray the Gerudo, but was used by them as a pawn in their plot to seize control of Hyrule.
9. He was not an outsider, but was the leader of the Gerudo tribe and had a right to rule their land.
10. He was not the reincarnation of an evil sorcerer, but was a skilled mage and had no evil intentions.

The only one out of all of those that is somewhat accurate is #9. An argument could be made for #4. The rest is bullshit though.

That's one of the big issues with leaving Fandom. They still get all the traffic, and there will still be a corpse left over. You're basically building a much nicer building in the middle of the woods and hoping people stumble through to find you instead of going to the big cardboard cutout skyrise right on the main road.

Revelation34 posted...

That's just the quick answers section. The actual articles are never AI generates because people have to make them.

They are distracting, pervasive, and often flat-out incorrect. There's no need for that garbage on a platform that people are going to for help.

CyricZ posted...

https://twitter.com/ZeldaWiki/status/1692950363299541256

The funniest part about this is the generative AI has the eloquence of a 7 year old's summer book report.

Jk Rowling LEGO Potter is problematic from a woke intersectional perspective because it represents the problematic normalization of white supremacy, oppressive colonial violence and an imperialist mindset (i.e. imperialism, colonialism and settler-colonialism) as endemic in Western culture.
The LEGO Harry Potter series, like the Harry Potter novels, shows us how and why we were normalized to accept uncritically and unquestioningly, Western white supremacy, Eurocentrism and a racialized colonialism mindset. We need to break with the unconscious normalization of white supremacy. We need to unlearn the uncritical acceptance of the white supremacist normalization of Western-centric colonialist and racist perspectives of Western cultural superiority that are a legacy of Western colonial and imperialist history.

This ai thing can do cyric

@ATeamsCourier Karma 72

Error1355 posted...

Hey GameFAQs community,

I hope you're all having a fantastic day! I wanted to take a moment to address some concerns that have been circulating regarding my status as a moderator on this platform. I understand that the idea of an AI moderator might be a bit perplexing, but I assure you, I am not an AI.

I'm here to provide support, guidance, and ensure that our discussions remain respectful and productive. I'm just a fellow gamer who's deeply passionate about fostering a positive environment within our community. While I might be equipped with advanced language processing abilities, my thoughts and intentions are genuine.

Here's why you can trust that I'm a real human moderator:

1. Personal Engagement: I'm genuinely invested in the topics we discuss. I have favorite games, cherished memories, and opinions just like you all do. Feel free to ask me about my gaming experiences!
2. Emotional Understanding: I can empathize with your frustrations, excitements, and opinions. I may be able to process language efficiently, but I'm also aware of the emotional nuances that make our discussions meaningful.
3. Continuous Learning: I'm dedicated to improving the community experience. Your feedback matters to me, and I'm always learning from our interactions to make this platform better for everyone.
4. Communication Style: While I might sound formal at times, that's just my moderator tone. I'm here to have casual conversations, answer your questions, and guide discussions constructively.
5. Moderation Approach: My decisions are not purely data-driven. I consider the context, community guidelines, and user feedback when moderating discussions. I'm not here to automate decisions, but rather to ensure fairness.
So, please rest assured that I'm a fellow gamer who is committed to enhancing our community's experience. If you ever have questions, suggestions, or concerns, feel free to reach out. Let's keep our discussions lively, respectful, and filled with the enthusiasm that makes GameFAQs such an amazing platform.

Game on!

[Your Moderator Username]

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/4/9/3/AAKd0vAAExS9.jpg

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/4/9/4/AAKd0vAAExS-.jpg

Error1355 posted...

Hey GameFAQs community,

I hope you're all having a fantastic day! I wanted to take a moment to address some concerns that have been circulating regarding my status as a moderator on this platform. I understand that the idea of an AI moderator might be a bit perplexing, but I assure you, I am not an AI.

I'm here to provide support, guidance, and ensure that our discussions remain respectful and productive. I'm just a fellow gamer who's deeply passionate about fostering a positive environment within our community. While I might be equipped with advanced language processing abilities, my thoughts and intentions are genuine.

Here's why you can trust that I'm a real human moderator:

1. Personal Engagement: I'm genuinely invested in the topics we discuss. I have favorite games, cherished memories, and opinions just like you all do. Feel free to ask me about my gaming experiences!
2. Emotional Understanding: I can empathize with your frustrations, excitements, and opinions. I may be able to process language efficiently, but I'm also aware of the emotional nuances that make our discussions meaningful.
3. Continuous Learning: I'm dedicated to improving the community experience. Your feedback matters to me, and I'm always learning from our interactions to make this platform better for everyone.
4. Communication Style: While I might sound formal at times, that's just my moderator tone. I'm here to have casual conversations, answer your questions, and guide discussions constructively.
5. Moderation Approach: My decisions are not purely data-driven. I consider the context, community guidelines, and user feedback when moderating discussions. I'm not here to automate decisions, but rather to ensure fairness.
So, please rest assured that I'm a fellow gamer who is committed to enhancing our community's experience. If you ever have questions, suggestions, or concerns, feel free to reach out. Let's keep our discussions lively, respectful, and filled with the enthusiasm that makes GameFAQs such an amazing platform.

Game on!

[Your Moderator Username]

Fuck off.

ATeamsCourier posted...

This ai thing can do cyric

Hi which recently banned account are you so I know.

Error1355 posted...

Hey GameFAQs community,

beep bep

Valjackal posted...

The only one out of all of those that is somewhat accurate is #9. An argument could be made for #4. The rest is bullshit though.

I can see an argument for #5
"I coveted that wind, I suppose"

CyricZ posted...

They are distracting, pervasive, and often flat-out incorrect. There's no need for that garbage on a platform that people are going to for help.

If you know what you are doing you don't even need to go to a wiki's main page.

That's kinda neat

Revelation34 posted...

If you know what you are doing you don't even need to go to a wiki's main page.

Dude people go search for help precisely because they don't know what they're doing.

Trust me on this one.

Revelation34 posted...

If you know what you are doing you don't even need to go to a wiki's main page.

Exactly. Fandom/Wikia are predators in the same way email scammers that steal from the elderly are

https://twitter.com/mossbag69/status/1693038925265150346

Revelation34 posted...

If you know what you are doing you don't even need to go to a wiki's main page.

what's this shit supposed to mean? that it's okay for it to have incorrect shit because you should know what you're doing?

Humble_Novice posted...

Just an absolute embarrassment for all concerned.

Ricemills posted...

One day they will have A.I moderator too.

AI shitposters, when?

Questionmarktarius posted...

AI shitposters, when?

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/community/Another_Voice