Is the PS3 version bad or something? You're not really saving much by going with the PS3 version. With the 360 version you're saving $20. No PC version.
-- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC
Of course any price is too much to pay for Dragon Age 2. But I don't recall hearing that the PS3 version had any particular fault that the other two didn't also have.
-- SuperNiceDog buried everyone else's hopes of winning the Guru contest in the backyard.
Definitely worth it, a rock solid game, sure it has some repeated dungeons etc, still a lot more content and more entertaining than about 80% of games this year.
-- One Piece: Pirates with style! -= Metal Gear Solid: Tactical Espionage Action =-
Psycho_Kenshin posted... Definitely worth it, a rock solid game, sure it has some repeated dungeons etc, still a lot more content and more entertaining than about 80% of games this year.
Repeated dungeons? Like the sidequests in Mass Effect?
-- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC
Some of the side-dungeons are cut-and-paste, the same dungeon, but with some doors covered or not etc to make them just slightly different. One of the main complaints people had, though gameplay wise its not much different than a lot of RPGs with samey dungeons. Which is kinda like those ones in Mass Effect now that you mention it.
The game does have some flaws, but its still a damn good one, I'd say better than Skyrim but I'm psycho. Be the champion of Kirkwall!
-- One Piece: Pirates with style! -= Metal Gear Solid: Tactical Espionage Action =-