GuessMyUserName posted... From: StifledSeagulls | Posted: 3/11/2012 5:25:47 PM | #048 Rush and Generations have been the only decent ones for a long time. someone hasn't played Colors
Hmm. This is actually true. I kind of kick the idea of getting it around sometimes, but change my mind. Is the DS version any good?
--
"If 50 cent was eligible, the world would be a better place. Because he would be a video game character instead of a real person." - MintCream
I tried Sonic Adventure for the first time back in... 2003, I think. I really didn't care for it at all, even back then - I can only imagine how bad it'd be today!
-- Hey, you ever coming back? You kidding? I am Queens Boulevard.
From: KingBartz | Posted: 3/11/2012 7:36:00 PM | #059 Sonic Adventure 1 and 2 excel in the sonic/shadow segments.
Problem is, SA1 has Big, Amy, and the needlessly cumbersome overworld.
SA2 is much better, but still suffers when you aren't controlling sonic/shadow.
I think one of the big reasons I like SA2 is that I have a soft spot for the Knuckles/Rouge stages too, so I enjoy 2/3rds of the game. I do kind of loathe Tails/Eggman stages in SA2 though.
I didn't think SA2 was that great back in the day either. When only 1/3 of your game is fun, I'll pass. I liked SA1 better, but I doubt I'll ever play either one of them again.
--
"Why must we always choose between certain death and probable death?" "I'm in an epic battle to the death, FIGURE IT OUT YOURSELF!"