Poll of the Day > This 19 y/o Tramp INTENTIONALLY Killed her 2 Kids whom she had with TWO DADS!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

19 y/o Walmart Psycho, Amanda Hawkins from Texas INTENTIONALLY killed her 2 daughters whom she had with TWO DIFFERENT FATHERS while she went out to party!!

She left her 2 daughters in a hot car for 15 hours while the children were crying in agony until they fell unconscious and died...

It has also been revealed that the wench set up a GoFundMe page to try to raise money to buy a HOUSE for her and her 2 daughters!!

Brynn Hawkins and Addyson Overgard-Eddy, agd 1 and 2 were found dead in her car overnight as she ignored their cries even late into the night...

The girls were found unconscious and in grave condition and by the time she sent them to the shopital, they were pronounced dead.

Back in December, the wench set up a Gofundme page to raise money to buy a new home that said "I'm trying to raise money to get us into a home. We are living with my grandparents. We are both working but it's still hard. Any help is greatly appreciated. We wlll be buying this house"

Her goal only raised 1500 and they have yet to receive that donation

Sheriff Hierholzer said "This is by far the most horrific case of child endangerment that i have seen in the 37 years that i have been in law enforcement"

She left both children in her car at 9pm while she hung out with a 16 y/o male friend and partied all night...the 2 girls were crying during the night..and her male friend even SLEPT in the car with the kids inside but didn't take them out!!

She finally took them out at noon the next day where temperatures were at 92 degrees and she didn't report it right away out of fear she'd be in trouble..it wasn't until the male friend convinced her to.

Amanda lied at first and said they became unconscious after smelling flowers at th park but after an investigation, she confessed the whole ugly truth..

If found guilty, she could face only 2 YEARS IN PRISON!!

Her friend, Miriam Davis said she's known her since middle school and noticed her treating her kids badly and regrets not busting her..she said "I hesitated for so long because i didn't want her kids in the system".

Do you think 2 years is too short for what she did?

Amanda - Tramp

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/06/10/06/414C8EAF00000578-4590570-image-a-52_1497074134223.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/06/11/01/41517B2900000578-4592396-Amanda_Hawkins_19_from_Kerr_County_Texas_pictured_in_a_mug_shot_-m-22_1497140215382.jpg

https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/nintchdbpict000330445816.jpg

http://www.lifo.gr/icache/500/250/1/1201577_t6.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/06/11/01/4151FC9D00000578-0-image-a-21_1497139749694.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/06/11/01/4151FC9900000578-0-image-a-20_1497139741178.jpg

Brynn - Deceased

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/06/10/05/414C3AD400000578-4590570-image-a-27_1497067241053.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/06/11/01/414CA07400000578-4592396-The_young_mom_found_her_kids_unconscious_when_she_finally_took_t-a-30_1497141040611.jpg

Addyson - Deceased

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/06/10/05/414C3AD000000578-4590570-image-m-26_1497067230401.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/06/10/07/414CA07400000578-4590570-image-m-63_1497075231110.jpg

Miriam - Friend

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/06/10/07/414CA12000000578-4590570-image-m-66_1497075521746.jpg
---

Am I missing something, or does Ducky not know what "INTENTIONALLY killed" means? Egregiously neglectful isn't quite the same as deliberate murder.

She deserves prison, still. I'm just not getting where you're getting "intentionally killed" out of this.
---

Even if it wasn't intentional, 2 years is far too short

Those poor kids
---

She kills her two kids and "(she) said they became unconscious after smelling flowers at the park" was used as defense. Anyone who says a eugenics program wouldn't be a good idea these days is delusional. Too many things happen like this.
---

It was an accident, I think she suffered more than enough and shouldn't be charged at all.
---

J_Dawg983 posted...

It was an accident, I think she suffered more than enough and shouldn't be charged at all.

There's a difference between "Oh my god, I forgot the kids in the car!" and "eh, I need the kids out of my hair for a while." She may not have meant to kill them, but she didn't exactly leave them in the car by accident, either. It was willful negligence on her part.
---

Mead posted...

Even if it wasn't intentional, 2 years is far too short

Those poor kids

---

J_Dawg983 posted...

It was an accident, I think she suffered more than enough and shouldn't be charged at all.

A accident leaving your kids in the car while you go and get smashed?
Sorry but no. As far as I'm concerned she should be sentenced for life.
---

should be death penalty
---

Full Throttle posted...

Walmart Psycho

That needs to be a metal band name.

Golden Road posted...

Am I missing something, or does Ducky not know what "INTENTIONALLY killed" means? Egregiously neglectful isn't quite the same as deliberate murder.

She deserves prison, still. I'm just not getting where you're getting "intentionally killed" out of this.

This, pretty much.

J_Dawg983 posted...

It was an accident, I think she suffered more than enough and shouldn't be charged at all.

How is it an accident? It was about as negligent as you can get. I'm also not sure how the mother suffered, although I know that her kids suffered for hours given what witnesses reported.

Mead posted...

Even if it wasn't intentional, 2 years is far too short

Those poor kids

Well, it was a negligence death and they were toddlers. It's probably a fair sentence.
---

Of course all the MEN are judging her! Patriachary at its finest!
---

J_Dawg983 posted...

Of course all the MEN are judging her! Patriachary at its finest!

dude you're not even trying to troll well

Full Throttle posted...

and her male friend even SLEPT in the car with the kids inside but didn't take them out!!

what the fuck???
---

I was thinking "I'd bang" until those last two pictures

Zeus posted...

Well, it was a negligence death and they were toddlers. It's probably a fair sentence.

The fuck does that mean
---

Mead posted...

Zeus posted...

Well, it was a negligence death and they were toddlers. It's probably a fair sentence.

The fuck does that mean

It means they were toddlers.
---

The responses in this thread is confusing the hell out of me. She definitely deserves more than two years.
---

She deserves the death penalty.

KStateKing17 posted...

The responses in this thread is confusing the hell out of me. She definitely deserves more than two years.

yes agreed
height of stupidity to leave them in the car so you can party, and they lost their lives for it, they probably would have been safer left in a bed room at the party.
---

who the hell would donate $1500? if she was a man nobody would have donated a cent!

Pailhead posted...

Mead posted...

Zeus posted...

Well, it was a negligence death and they were toddlers. It's probably a fair sentence.

The fuck does that mean

It means they were toddlers.

Pretty much. Mead needs to start figuring out some of these things for himself.

KStateKing17 posted...

The responses in this thread is confusing the hell out of me. She definitely deserves more than two years.

Why? It'd be one thing if she did it intentionally or even if the victims were older, but it seems more than fair given the circumstances of the case.
---

What? Being sentenced two years would most likely mean she would serve less than that. Two counts of child endangerment plus two counts of being charged for their death sounds like it should equal more than two years. Whether them dying was her intention or not, this doesn't seem like it really punishes her since she'll be out by 22 at the latest just to push out more kids to endanger.
---

KStateKing17 posted...

Being sentenced two years would most likely mean she would serve less than that.

Which is how the legal system generally works. Otherwise we have even more overcrowded prisons.

KStateKing17 posted...

Two counts of child endangerment plus two counts of being charged for their death

Except that's double-dipping. If a guy punches somebody and accidentally kills him, he just gets the manslaughter charge, not the manslaughter and assault.

KStateKing17 posted...

Whether them dying was her intention or not, this doesn't seem like it really punishes her since she'll be out by 22 at the latest just to push out more kids to endanger.

Blame the ACLU for not allowing courts to sentence women to have a tubal occlusion then. However, I'm sure she'll have plenty of abortions and whatever kids she keeps will be neglected no matter what. Or, you know, prison will fix her. People do sometimes learn from their mistakes and there's a point of diminishing returns when it comes to sentence length.
---

Zeus posted...

KStateKing17 posted...

Being sentenced two years would most likely mean she would serve less than that.

Which is how the legal system generally works. Otherwise we have even more overcrowded prisons.

KStateKing17 posted...

Two counts of child endangerment plus two counts of being charged for their death

Except that's double-dipping. If a guy punches somebody and accidentally kills him, he just gets the manslaughter charge, not the manslaughter and assault.

KStateKing17 posted...

Whether them dying was her intention or not, this doesn't seem like it really punishes her since she'll be out by 22 at the latest just to push out more kids to endanger.

Blame the ACLU for not allowing courts to sentence women to have a tubal occlusion then. However, I'm sure she'll have plenty of abortions and whatever kids she keeps will be neglected no matter what. Or, you know, prison will fix her. People do sometimes learn from their mistakes and there's a point of diminishing returns when it comes to sentence length.

Lmao Zeus are you for real?
---

KStateKing17 posted...

Zeus posted...

KStateKing17 posted...

Being sentenced two years would most likely mean she would serve less than that.

Which is how the legal system generally works. Otherwise we have even more overcrowded prisons.

KStateKing17 posted...

Two counts of child endangerment plus two counts of being charged for their death

Except that's double-dipping. If a guy punches somebody and accidentally kills him, he just gets the manslaughter charge, not the manslaughter and assault.

KStateKing17 posted...

Whether them dying was her intention or not, this doesn't seem like it really punishes her since she'll be out by 22 at the latest just to push out more kids to endanger.

Blame the ACLU for not allowing courts to sentence women to have a tubal occlusion then. However, I'm sure she'll have plenty of abortions and whatever kids she keeps will be neglected no matter what. Or, you know, prison will fix her. People do sometimes learn from their mistakes and there's a point of diminishing returns when it comes to sentence length.

Lmao Zeus are you for real?

Asks the guy who wants a life sentence over a negligent death. Keep in mind that you were the one who bizarrely suggested she shouldn't be allowed to have children again which is all kinds of unconstitutional.
---

Zeus posted...

KStateKing17 posted...

Zeus posted...

KStateKing17 posted...

Being sentenced two years would most likely mean she would serve less than that.

Which is how the legal system generally works. Otherwise we have even more overcrowded prisons.

KStateKing17 posted...

Two counts of child endangerment plus two counts of being charged for their death

Except that's double-dipping. If a guy punches somebody and accidentally kills him, he just gets the manslaughter charge, not the manslaughter and assault.

KStateKing17 posted...

Whether them dying was her intention or not, this doesn't seem like it really punishes her since she'll be out by 22 at the latest just to push out more kids to endanger.

Blame the ACLU for not allowing courts to sentence women to have a tubal occlusion then. However, I'm sure she'll have plenty of abortions and whatever kids she keeps will be neglected no matter what. Or, you know, prison will fix her. People do sometimes learn from their mistakes and there's a point of diminishing returns when it comes to sentence length.

Lmao Zeus are you for real?

Asks the guy who wants a life sentence over a negligent death. Keep in mind that you were the one who bizarrely suggested she shouldn't be allowed to have children again which is all kinds of unconstitutional.

Wow. I didn't say any of that. All I said was two years sounded like a slap on the wrist for being responsible for the deaths of two children. I also didn't say she shouldn't be allowed to have children again either. I said her being there for a short time at a young age would not likely change her way of thinking.
---

KStateKing17 posted...

I said her being there for a short time at a young age would not likely change her way of thinking.

Here's the thing: Unless she did it deliberately, two years is more than enough time to change her way of thinking. If she wants to keep partying, she'll likely have an abortion instead of abandoning her kids to die (and she can abort as many as she likes without suffering any prison sentence); or, at the very least, put more effort into having somebody stable look after them. If she wants to have kids again, she's almost guaranteed to take better care of them especially since her support network is going to put more effort into making sure the kids are okay.
---

Jen, how could you do this?!
---

Zeus posted...

KStateKing17 posted...

I said her being there for a short time at a young age would not likely change her way of thinking.

Here's the thing: Unless she did it deliberately, two years is more than enough time to change her way of thinking. If she wants to keep partying, she'll likely have an abortion instead of abandoning her kids to die (and she can abort as many as she likes without suffering any prison sentence); or, at the very least, put more effort into having somebody stable look after them. If she wants to have kids again, she's almost guaranteed to take better care of them especially since her support network is going to put more effort into making sure the kids are okay.

That's just being hopeful and assuming she believes in that sort of thing despite what happened. The fact that she lied about what happened to the kids in the first place kind of proves she wasn't willing to take responsibility for her actions. If they ever decide to follow up with her, we'll see what that year in jail will do for her.
---

I'm sure that 16 year old knocked her up at the party so she'll have new kids to neglect in no time

Zeus posted...

KStateKing17 posted...

I said her being there for a short time at a young age would not likely change her way of thinking.

Here's the thing: Unless she did it deliberately, two years is more than enough time to change her way of thinking. If she wants to keep partying, she'll likely have an abortion instead of abandoning her kids to die (and she can abort as many as she likes without suffering any prison sentence); or, at the very least, put more effort into having somebody stable look after them. If she wants to have kids again, she's almost guaranteed to take better care of them especially since her support network is going to put more effort into making sure the kids are okay.

Alot of people in here seem like the type that would kill kids.
---

KStateKing17 posted...

Zeus posted...

KStateKing17 posted...

I said her being there for a short time at a young age would not likely change her way of thinking.

Here's the thing: Unless she did it deliberately, two years is more than enough time to change her way of thinking. If she wants to keep partying, she'll likely have an abortion instead of abandoning her kids to die (and she can abort as many as she likes without suffering any prison sentence); or, at the very least, put more effort into having somebody stable look after them. If she wants to have kids again, she's almost guaranteed to take better care of them especially since her support network is going to put more effort into making sure the kids are okay.

That's just being hopeful and assuming she believes in that sort of thing despite what happened. The fact that she lied about what happened to the kids in the first place kind of proves she wasn't willing to take responsibility for her actions. If they ever decide to follow up with her, we'll see what that year in jail will do for her.

Look at Casey Anthony: She's neither had a new kid nor has she killed any additional ones. And she might have actually done it deliberately.
---