D: Was the 2nd Amendment a tool to help preserve slavery?

Topic List	Page List: 1
Amputation 06/11/17 1:31:06 PM #1:	(Preface: None of my opinion is ITT, just of the authors) Liberal writer/pundit Thom Hartmann believes the second amendment was ratified in part to help preserve the institution of slavery. Is he right / wrong / crazy? http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/13890-the-second-amendment-was-ratified-to-preserve-slavery --- Now Playing: Overwatch, Etrian Odyssey Untold: The Millennium Girl <cite>Amputation posted [p:880842639] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote>(Preface: None of my opinion is ITT, just of the authors) Liberal writer/pundit Thom Hartmann believes the second amendment was ratified in part to help preserve the institution of slavery. Is he right / wrong / crazy? http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/13890-the-second-amendment-was-ratified-to-preserve-slavery</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vertania 06/11/17 1:41:57 PM #2:	I doubt that was the entire reason for it, but his arguement does make some sense. <cite>Vertania posted [p:880843187] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote>I doubt that was the entire reason for it, but his arguement does make some sense.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 06/11/17 1:42:20 PM #3:	Wrong. Nothing in the Constitution was written to preserve it, because most of the people involved in its writing and ratification were abolitionists. --- Deus Ex Wii U is $20-$55 more expensive than other versions, but it only didn't sell because Wii U owners don't like third-party games. - king_madden <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:880843207] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote>Wrong. Nothing in the Constitution was written to preserve it, because most of the people involved in its writing and ratification were abolitionists.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#4	Post #4 was unavailable or deleted.
DarkChozoGhost 06/11/17 1:45:58 PM #5:	That sounds silly. Just because there's a large overlap of racist assholes and 2nd amendment fanatics doesn't mean there two have always been married --- My sister's dog bit a hole in my Super Mario Land cartridge. It still works though - Skye Reynolds 3DS FC: 3239-5612-0115 <cite>DarkChozoGhost posted [p:880843392] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote>That sounds silly. Just because there's a large overlap of racist assholes and 2nd amendment fanatics doesn't mean there two have always been married</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputation 06/11/17 1:46:21 PM #6:	darkjedilink posted... Wrong. Nothing in the Constitution was written to preserve it, because most of the people involved in its writing and ratification were abolitionists. Lol, I'm going to assume this is a joke. --- Now Playing: Overwatch, Etrian Odyssey Untold: The Millennium Girl <cite>Amputation posted [p:880843408] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Wrong. Nothing in the Constitution was written to preserve it, because most of the people involved in its writing and ratification were abolitionists.</quote> Lol, I'm going to assume this is a joke.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Soviet_Shurima 06/11/17 1:49:09 PM #7:	Vertania posted... I doubt that was the entire reason for it, but his arguement does make some sense. --- I am G_G "CE has also complained before" - Terra-enforcer <cite>Soviet_Shurima posted [p:880843571] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vertania posted...</cite> <quote>I doubt that was the entire reason for it, but his arguement does make some sense.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Malcrasternus 06/11/17 1:58:08 PM #8:	No. In fact I feel gun control itself has roots in racism, to prevent black people from protecting themselves effectively. --- http://i.imgtc.com/tUK3LwiHnb.jpg 4/15/1951 - 3/18/2014 "But not forgotten." <cite>Malcrasternus posted [p:880844026] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote>No. In fact I feel gun control itself has roots in racism, to prevent black people from protecting themselves effectively.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputation 06/11/17 2:03:48 PM #9:	Malcrasternus posted... No. In fact I feel gun control itself has roots in racism, to prevent black people from protecting themselves effectively. Uh... Not even going to touch this weirdness. --- Now Playing: Overwatch, Etrian Odyssey Untold: The Millennium Girl <cite>Amputation posted [p:880844324] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Malcrasternus posted...</cite> <quote>No. In fact I feel gun control itself has roots in racism, to prevent black people from protecting themselves effectively.</quote> Uh... Not even going to touch this weirdness.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vertania 06/11/17 2:04:37 PM #10:	Malcrasternus posted... No. In fact I feel gun control itself has roots in racism, to prevent black people from protecting themselves effectively. What? <cite>Vertania posted [p:880844373] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Malcrasternus posted...</cite> <quote>No. In fact I feel gun control itself has roots in racism, to prevent black people from protecting themselves effectively.</quote> What?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputation 06/11/17 2:06:18 PM #11:	Vertania posted... Malcrasternus posted... No. In fact I feel gun control itself has roots in racism, to prevent black people from protecting themselves effectively. What? The first time I've agreed with you, Vertania. What? I would love to hear this explanation. --- Now Playing: Overwatch, Etrian Odyssey Untold: The Millennium Girl <cite>Amputation posted [p:880844473] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vertania posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Malcrasternus posted...</cite> <quote>No. In fact I feel gun control itself has roots in racism, to prevent black people from protecting themselves effectively.</quote> What?</quote> The first time I've agreed with you, Vertania. What? I would love to hear this explanation.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Steelers 06/11/17 2:12:05 PM #12:	No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it. <cite>Steelers posted [p:880844764] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote>No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 06/11/17 2:15:54 PM #13:	Amputation posted... Vertania posted... Malcrasternus posted... No. In fact I feel gun control itself has roots in racism, to prevent black people from protecting themselves effectively. What? The first time I've agreed with you, Vertania. What? I would love to hear this explanation. What race is disproportionately prevented from legally owning firearms due to gun control laws? Hint - it ain't white people. --- Deus Ex Wii U is $20-$55 more expensive than other versions, but it only didn't sell because Wii U owners don't like third-party games. - king_madden <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:880844958] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vertania posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Malcrasternus posted...</cite> <quote>No. In fact I feel gun control itself has roots in racism, to prevent black people from protecting themselves effectively.</quote> What?</quote> The first time I've agreed with you, Vertania. What? I would love to hear this explanation.</quote> What race is disproportionately prevented from legally owning firearms due to gun control laws? Hint - it ain't white people.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputation 06/11/17 2:16:30 PM #14:	Steelers posted... No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it. So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco? --- Now Playing: Overwatch, Etrian Odyssey Untold: The Millennium Girl <cite>Amputation posted [p:880844999] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Steelers posted...</cite> <quote>No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it.</quote> So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputation 06/11/17 2:17:09 PM #15:	darkjedilink posted... Amputation posted... Vertania posted... Malcrasternus posted... No. In fact I feel gun control itself has roots in racism, to prevent black people from protecting themselves effectively. What? The first time I've agreed with you, Vertania. What? I would love to hear this explanation. What race is disproportionately prevented from legally owning firearms due to gun control laws? Hint - it ain't white people. Citation required. --- Now Playing: Overwatch, Etrian Odyssey Untold: The Millennium Girl <cite>Amputation posted [p:880845038] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vertania posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Malcrasternus posted...</cite> <quote>No. In fact I feel gun control itself has roots in racism, to prevent black people from protecting themselves effectively.</quote> What?</quote> The first time I've agreed with you, Vertania. What? I would love to hear this explanation.</quote> What race is disproportionately prevented from legally owning firearms due to gun control laws? Hint - it ain't white people.</quote> Citation required.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vertania 06/11/17 2:20:41 PM #16:	darkjedilink posted... What race is disproportionately prevented from legally owning firearms due to gun control laws? Hint - it ain't white people. Today? None. Unless you can show me how race is a determining factor in getting a gun license. <cite>Vertania posted [p:880845243] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What race is disproportionately prevented from legally owning firearms due to gun control laws? Hint - it ain't white people.</quote> Today? None. Unless you can show me how race is a determining factor in getting a gun license.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 06/11/17 2:50:31 PM #17:	Vertania posted... darkjedilink posted... What race is disproportionately prevented from legally owning firearms due to gun control laws? Hint - it ain't white people. Today? None. Unless you can show me how race is a determining factor in getting a gun license. Black people have FAAAAR more felonies per capita than any other race in America. Felons can't legally purchase firearms due to gun control laws. Ergo, black people are disproportionately affected by gun control. Not that fuckin' hard to follow. --- Deus Ex Wii U is $20-$55 more expensive than other versions, but it only didn't sell because Wii U owners don't like third-party games. - king_madden <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:880846850] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vertania posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What race is disproportionately prevented from legally owning firearms due to gun control laws? Hint - it ain't white people.</quote> Today? None. Unless you can show me how race is a determining factor in getting a gun license.</quote> Black people have FAAAAR more felonies per capita than any other race in America. Felons can't legally purchase firearms due to gun control laws. Ergo, black people are disproportionately affected by gun control. Not that fuckin' hard to follow.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 06/11/17 2:51:30 PM #18:	Amputation posted... Steelers posted... No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it. So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco? Armed US citizens outgun the top 5 standing armies of the world... --- Deus Ex Wii U is $20-$55 more expensive than other versions, but it only didn't sell because Wii U owners don't like third-party games. - king_madden <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:880846911] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steelers posted...</cite> <quote>No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it.</quote> So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco?</quote> Armed US citizens outgun the top 5 standing armies of the world...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sativa_Rose 06/11/17 2:51:34 PM #19:	Vertania posted... darkjedilink posted... What race is disproportionately prevented from legally owning firearms due to gun control laws? Hint - it ain't white people. Today? None. Unless you can show me how race is a determining factor in getting a gun license. I think it might have more to do with cities with higher African American populations (see NYC, Baltimore, Chicago) having really strict gun control compared to other areas. --- I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister. <cite>Sativa_Rose posted [p:880846915] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vertania posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What race is disproportionately prevented from legally owning firearms due to gun control laws? Hint - it ain't white people.</quote> Today? None. Unless you can show me how race is a determining factor in getting a gun license.</quote> I think it might have more to do with cities with higher African American populations (see NYC, Baltimore, Chicago) having really strict gun control compared to other areas.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
lilORANG 06/11/17 2:52:13 PM #20:	I doubt it because the constitution itself sort of does that. --- #FeelTheBern http://i.imgur.com/q5z4CUu.jpg http://i.imgur.com/6B9oFXh.jpg http://i.imgur.com/sy42Dlf.jpg <cite>lilORANG posted [p:880846952] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote>I doubt it because the constitution itself sort of does that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sativa_Rose 06/11/17 2:53:26 PM #21:	lilORANG posted... I doubt it because the constitution itself sort of does that. Preserve slavery? How did it do that exactly, just by not banning it? --- I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister. <cite>Sativa_Rose posted [p:880847018] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>lilORANG posted...</cite> <quote>I doubt it because the constitution itself sort of does that.</quote> Preserve slavery? How did it do that exactly, just by not banning it?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 06/11/17 2:54:15 PM #22:	Vertania posted... I doubt that was the entire reason for it, but his arguement does make some sense. --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:880847072] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vertania posted...</cite> <quote>I doubt that was the entire reason for it, but his arguement does make some sense.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputation 06/11/17 2:54:43 PM #23:	darkjedilink posted... Amputation posted... Steelers posted... No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it. So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco? Armed US citizens outgun the top 5 standing armies of the world... Hahaha, yeah, what a match for stealth bombers and tanks --- Now Playing: Overwatch, Etrian Odyssey Untold: The Millennium Girl <cite>Amputation posted [p:880847099] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steelers posted...</cite> <quote>No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it.</quote> So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco?</quote> Armed US citizens outgun the top 5 standing armies of the world...</quote> Hahaha, yeah, what a match for stealth bombers and tanks</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HogRiderreturns 06/11/17 2:55:33 PM #24:	Amputation posted... Steelers posted... No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it. So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco? How does that count? Waco wasn't people fighting against tyranny. It was a situation with some nutjobs that got out of hand. --- http://i.imgur.com/wuFm3hd.jpg - My Hash Brownies. http://i.imgur.com/mQ7syoS.gif http://i.imgur.com/lY3erBp.jpg <cite>HogRiderreturns posted [p:880847148] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steelers posted...</cite> <quote>No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it.</quote> So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco?</quote> How does that count? Waco wasn't people fighting against tyranny. It was a situation with some nutjobs that got out of hand.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
lilORANG 06/11/17 2:55:46 PM #25:	Sativa_Rose posted... lilORANG posted... I doubt it because the constitution itself sort of does that. Preserve slavery? How did it do that exactly, just by not banning it? yes, and by sanctioning it. --- #FeelTheBern http://i.imgur.com/q5z4CUu.jpg http://i.imgur.com/6B9oFXh.jpg http://i.imgur.com/sy42Dlf.jpg <cite>lilORANG posted [p:880847159] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sativa_Rose posted...</cite> <quote><cite>lilORANG posted...</cite> <quote>I doubt it because the constitution itself sort of does that.</quote> Preserve slavery? How did it do that exactly, just by not banning it?</quote> yes, and by sanctioning it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sativa_Rose 06/11/17 2:55:56 PM #26:	Amputation posted... darkjedilink posted... Amputation posted... Steelers posted... No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it. So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco? Armed US citizens outgun the top 5 standing armies of the world... Hahaha, yeah, what a match for stealth bombers and tanks It's kind of ironic how the US military fails against insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan, yet suddenly becomes this ultra-capable invincible weapon when dealing with hypothetical American insurgencies (and let's not ignore the fact that it's likely that the US military wouldn't just go along with attacking its own citizens, especially given how much of the military hails from "red states") --- I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister. <cite>Sativa_Rose posted [p:880847178] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steelers posted...</cite> <quote>No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it.</quote> So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco?</quote> Armed US citizens outgun the top 5 standing armies of the world...</quote> Hahaha, yeah, what a match for stealth bombers and tanks</quote> It's kind of ironic how the US military fails against insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan, yet suddenly becomes this ultra-capable invincible weapon when dealing with hypothetical American insurgencies (and let's not ignore the fact that it's likely that the US military wouldn't just go along with attacking its own citizens, especially given how much of the military hails from "red states")</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputation 06/11/17 2:55:58 PM #27:	darkjedilink posted... Vertania posted... darkjedilink posted... What race is disproportionately prevented from legally owning firearms due to gun control laws? Hint - it ain't white people. Today? None. Unless you can show me how race is a determining factor in getting a gun license. Black people have FAAAAR more felonies per capita than any other race in America. Felons can't legally purchase firearms due to gun control laws. Ergo, black people are disproportionately affected by gun control. Not that fuckin' hard to follow. Are you pretending to be outraged over this? --- Now Playing: Overwatch, Etrian Odyssey Untold: The Millennium Girl <cite>Amputation posted [p:880847180] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vertania posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What race is disproportionately prevented from legally owning firearms due to gun control laws? Hint - it ain't white people.</quote> Today? None. Unless you can show me how race is a determining factor in getting a gun license.</quote> Black people have FAAAAR more felonies per capita than any other race in America. Felons can't legally purchase firearms due to gun control laws. Ergo, black people are disproportionately affected by gun control. Not that fuckin' hard to follow.</quote> Are you pretending to be outraged over this?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HogRiderreturns 06/11/17 2:56:35 PM #28:	Amputation posted... darkjedilink posted... Amputation posted... Steelers posted... No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it. So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco? Armed US citizens outgun the top 5 standing armies of the world... Hahaha, yeah, what a match for stealth bombers and tanks Yes, because no one in the military would ever side with the people. --- http://i.imgur.com/wuFm3hd.jpg - My Hash Brownies. http://i.imgur.com/mQ7syoS.gif http://i.imgur.com/lY3erBp.jpg <cite>HogRiderreturns posted [p:880847215] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steelers posted...</cite> <quote>No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it.</quote> So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco?</quote> Armed US citizens outgun the top 5 standing armies of the world...</quote> Hahaha, yeah, what a match for stealth bombers and tanks</quote> Yes, because no one in the military would ever side with the people.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputation 06/11/17 2:57:25 PM #29:	Sativa_Rose posted... Amputation posted... darkjedilink posted... Amputation posted... Steelers posted... No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it. So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco? Armed US citizens outgun the top 5 standing armies of the world... Hahaha, yeah, what a match for stealth bombers and tanks It's kind of ironic how the US military fails against insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan, yet suddenly becomes this ultra-capable invincible weapon when dealing with hypothetical American insurgencies (and let's not ignore the fact that it's likely that the US military wouldn't just go along with attacking its own citizens, especially given how much of the military hails from "red states") A coup of a small number of paranoid rednecks does not compare to any other fighting force in the world on their home soil. --- Now Playing: Overwatch, Etrian Odyssey Untold: The Millennium Girl <cite>Amputation posted [p:880847268] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sativa_Rose posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steelers posted...</cite> <quote>No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it.</quote> So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco?</quote> Armed US citizens outgun the top 5 standing armies of the world...</quote> Hahaha, yeah, what a match for stealth bombers and tanks</quote> It's kind of ironic how the US military fails against insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan, yet suddenly becomes this ultra-capable invincible weapon when dealing with hypothetical American insurgencies (and let's not ignore the fact that it's likely that the US military wouldn't just go along with attacking its own citizens, especially given how much of the military hails from "red states")</quote> A coup of a small number of paranoid rednecks does not compare to any other fighting force in the world on their home soil.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 06/11/17 2:57:49 PM #30:	There's almost nothing a regressive liberal can't blame on racism. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:880847301] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote>There's almost nothing a regressive liberal can't blame on racism.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputation 06/11/17 2:58:33 PM #31:	HogRiderreturns posted... Amputation posted... darkjedilink posted... Amputation posted... Steelers posted... No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it. So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco? Armed US citizens outgun the top 5 standing armies of the world... Hahaha, yeah, what a match for stealth bombers and tanks Yes, because no one in the military would ever side with the people. Wouldn't it depend on the reason for the coup? Because as of right now, nobody sides with paranoid RWNJ armed conspiracy theorists --- Now Playing: Overwatch, Etrian Odyssey Untold: The Millennium Girl <cite>Amputation posted [p:880847343] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>HogRiderreturns posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Amputation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steelers posted...</cite> <quote>No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it.</quote> So does that make it have zero relevance today? Because all of the firearms on earth in the hands of Americans citizens could not prevent a tyrannical scenario against the government / military Remember Waco?</quote> Armed US citizens outgun the top 5 standing armies of the world...</quote> Hahaha, yeah, what a match for stealth bombers and tanks</quote> Yes, because no one in the military would ever side with the people.</quote> Wouldn't it depend on the reason for the coup? Because as of right now, nobody sides with paranoid RWNJ armed conspiracy theorists</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
3rd_Best_Master 06/11/17 3:02:49 PM #32:	Steelers posted... No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it. I always see people say this but they never elaborate on what form of tyranny the 2nd amendment is supposed to prevent. What scenario would have to occur for a reasonable part of the population to rise and fight the government? It certainly wasn't used when the government was rounding up Japanese and placing them in camps. It wasn't used when the government was experimenting on black people with syphilis. It's also not used to prevent the government from shooting unarmed civilians or stealing their property to fund police departments. So when will 2nd Amendment advocates rise up and fight off tyranny? --- You've fought the strongest, the second strongest, the fourth strongest, and the weakest master! Now you see the true advantage of being third strongest master! <cite>3rd_Best_Master posted [p:880847569] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Steelers posted...</cite> <quote>No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it.</quote> I always see people say this but they never elaborate on what form of tyranny the 2nd amendment is supposed to prevent. What scenario would have to occur for a reasonable part of the population to rise and fight the government? It certainly wasn't used when the government was rounding up Japanese and placing them in camps. It wasn't used when the government was experimenting on black people with syphilis. It's also not used to prevent the government from shooting unarmed civilians or stealing their property to fund police departments. So when will 2nd Amendment advocates rise up and fight off tyranny?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Malcrasternus 06/11/17 3:04:06 PM #33:	There were several laws passed that either outright banned black people from owning firearms, before the bill of rights was fully formed, or worded it in a way that to an outsider wouldn't look racist, but blatantly was. For example, in southern states post civil war, laws were passed in areas that permitted firearm ownership only to official, documented soldiers of the confederate army. Then we have the NRA, which pushed for the banning of open carry during the time when members of the Black Panthers would travel the streets with firearms either over the shoulder, or outright brandished in the streets. Funnily enough, no one had a problem with white people doing this until the BP started gaining traction. Other places banned the sale of cheaply made, crude firearms known as Saturday Night Specials, which again doesn't sound racist, but was passed during a time where black people were paid far less on the dollar, and couldn't afford the more refined, quality made, expensive firearms. I'm not arguing that modern attempts on gun control is inherently racist, unless it targets specific areas, or bans firearms below a certain price point, but to say not one single piece of gun legislature in the history of this nation was passed without some sort of racist connotation(especially in the south) I feel borders on willful ignorance of the past. --- http://i.imgtc.com/tUK3LwiHnb.jpg 4/15/1951 - 3/18/2014 "But not forgotten." <cite>Malcrasternus posted [p:880847643] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote>There were several laws passed that either outright banned black people from owning firearms, before the bill of rights was fully formed, or worded it in a way that to an outsider wouldn't look racist, but blatantly was. For example, in southern states post civil war, laws were passed in areas that permitted firearm ownership only to official, documented soldiers of the confederate army. Then we have the NRA, which pushed for the banning of open carry during the time when members of the Black Panthers would travel the streets with firearms either over the shoulder, or outright brandished in the streets. Funnily enough, no one had a problem with white people doing this until the BP started gaining traction. Other places banned the sale of cheaply made, crude firearms known as Saturday Night Specials, which again doesn't sound racist, but was passed during a time where black people were paid far less on the dollar, and couldn't afford the more refined, quality made, expensive firearms. I'm not arguing that modern attempts on gun control is inherently racist, unless it targets specific areas, or bans firearms below a certain price point, but to say not one single piece of gun legislature in the history of this nation was passed without some sort of racist connotation(especially in the south) I feel borders on willful ignorance of the past.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vertania 06/11/17 3:05:21 PM #34:	darkjedilink posted... Vertania posted... Unless you can show me how race is a determining factor in getting a gun license. Black people have FAAAAR more felonies per capita than any other race in America. Felons can't legally purchase firearms due to gun control laws. Ergo, black people are disproportionately affected by gun control. Race isn't the determining factor, being a convicted felon is. Felons of any race are prevented from legally owning guns. <cite>Vertania posted [p:880847713] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vertania posted...</cite> <quote>Unless you can show me how race is a determining factor in getting a gun license.</quote> Black people have FAAAAR more felonies per capita than any other race in America. Felons can't legally purchase firearms due to gun control laws. Ergo, black people are disproportionately affected by gun control.</quote> Race isn't the determining factor, being a convicted felon is. Felons of any race are prevented from legally owning guns.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HogRiderreturns 06/11/17 3:05:30 PM #35:	3rd_Best_Master posted... Steelers posted... No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it. I always see people say this but they never elaborate on what form of tyranny the 2nd amendment is supposed to prevent. What scenario would have to occur for a reasonable part of the population to rise and fight the government? It certainly wasn't used when the government was rounding up Japanese and placing them in camps. It wasn't used when the government was experimenting on black people with syphilis. It's also not used to prevent the government from shooting unarmed civilians or stealing their property to fund police departments. So when will 2nd Amendment advocates rise up and fight off tyranny? Because the people that cried the most over that stuff were a bunch of anti-gun liberal babies. --- http://i.imgur.com/wuFm3hd.jpg - My Hash Brownies. http://i.imgur.com/mQ7syoS.gif http://i.imgur.com/lY3erBp.jpg <cite>HogRiderreturns posted [p:880847725] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steelers posted...</cite> <quote>No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it.</quote> I always see people say this but they never elaborate on what form of tyranny the 2nd amendment is supposed to prevent. What scenario would have to occur for a reasonable part of the population to rise and fight the government? It certainly wasn't used when the government was rounding up Japanese and placing them in camps. It wasn't used when the government was experimenting on black people with syphilis. It's also not used to prevent the government from shooting unarmed civilians or stealing their property to fund police departments. So when will 2nd Amendment advocates rise up and fight off tyranny?</quote> Because the people that cried the most over that stuff were a bunch of anti-gun liberal babies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
lilORANG 06/11/17 3:06:06 PM #36:	Also a good number of northern states has abolished slavery before the Constitution was ratified, so some of the framers certainly weren't thinking about slavery. --- #FeelTheBern http://i.imgur.com/q5z4CUu.jpg http://i.imgur.com/6B9oFXh.jpg http://i.imgur.com/sy42Dlf.jpg <cite>lilORANG posted [p:880847763] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote>Also a good number of northern states has abolished slavery before the Constitution was ratified, so some of the framers certainly weren't thinking about slavery.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
3rd_Best_Master 06/11/17 3:16:34 PM #37:	HogRiderreturns posted... 3rd_Best_Master posted... Steelers posted... No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it. I always see people say this but they never elaborate on what form of tyranny the 2nd amendment is supposed to prevent. What scenario would have to occur for a reasonable part of the population to rise and fight the government? It certainly wasn't used when the government was rounding up Japanese and placing them in camps. It wasn't used when the government was experimenting on black people with syphilis. It's also not used to prevent the government from shooting unarmed civilians or stealing their property to fund police departments. So when will 2nd Amendment advocates rise up and fight off tyranny? Because the people that cried the most over that stuff were a bunch of anti-gun liberal babies. 2nd Amendment advocates will defend tyranny so long as it's happening to liberals? Lol wat --- Posted with GameRaven 3.2 <cite>3rd_Best_Master posted [p:880848328] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>HogRiderreturns posted...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Steelers posted...</cite> <quote> No the second amendment was passed to prevent tyranny, you know, the thing those dirty racists founding fathers had just fought a war to get free from. Slavery was only allowed because the southern states would not join the union without it. </quote> I always see people say this but they never elaborate on what form of tyranny the 2nd amendment is supposed to prevent. What scenario would have to occur for a reasonable part of the population to rise and fight the government? It certainly wasn't used when the government was rounding up Japanese and placing them in camps. It wasn't used when the government was experimenting on black people with syphilis. It's also not used to prevent the government from shooting unarmed civilians or stealing their property to fund police departments. So when will 2nd Amendment advocates rise up and fight off tyranny?</quote> Because the people that cried the most over that stuff were a bunch of anti-gun liberal babies.</quote> 2nd Amendment advocates will defend tyranny so long as it's happening to liberals? Lol wat</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vertania 06/11/17 3:18:26 PM #38:	Malcrasternus posted... There were several laws passed that either outright banned black people from owning firearms, before the bill of rights was fully formed, or worded it in a way that to an outsider wouldn't look racist, but blatantly was... Okay, that makes more sense now that you expanded on it. I wasn't doubting that racism had some influence on gun laws btw. <cite>Vertania posted [p:880848435] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>Malcrasternus posted...</cite> <quote>There were several laws passed that either outright banned black people from owning firearms, before the bill of rights was fully formed, or worded it in a way that to an outsider wouldn't look racist, but blatantly was...</quote> Okay, that makes more sense now that you expanded on it. I wasn't doubting that racism had some influence on gun laws btw.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HogRiderreturns 06/11/17 3:21:37 PM #39:	3rd_Best_Master posted... 2nd Amendment advocates will defend tyranny so long as it's happening to liberals? Lol wat Why should gun people stand up to something that liberals won't. If it was something that was actually terrible you should have no problem picking up and fighting too. Don't expect the gun people to do the dirty work while the liberals just sit back and try to take the credit. --- http://i.imgur.com/wuFm3hd.jpg - My Hash Brownies. http://i.imgur.com/mQ7syoS.gif http://i.imgur.com/lY3erBp.jpg <cite>HogRiderreturns posted [p:880848627] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote>2nd Amendment advocates will defend tyranny so long as it's happening to liberals? Lol wat</quote> Why should gun people stand up to something that liberals won't. If it was something that was actually terrible you should have no problem picking up and fighting too. Don't expect the gun people to do the dirty work while the liberals just sit back and try to take the credit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
3rd_Best_Master 06/11/17 3:22:48 PM #40:	HogRiderreturns posted... 3rd_Best_Master posted... 2nd Amendment advocates will defend tyranny so long as it's happening to liberals? Lol wat Why should gun people stand up to something that liberals won't. If it was something that was actually terrible you should have no problem picking up and fighting too. Don't expect the gun people to do the dirty work while the liberals just sit back and try to take the credit. So then the 2nd Amendment actually has nothing to do with fighting tyranny at all. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.2 <cite>3rd_Best_Master posted [p:880848689] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>HogRiderreturns posted...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote> 2nd Amendment advocates will defend tyranny so long as it's happening to liberals? Lol wat</quote> Why should gun people stand up to something that liberals won't. If it was something that was actually terrible you should have no problem picking up and fighting too. Don't expect the gun people to do the dirty work while the liberals just sit back and try to take the credit.</quote> So then the 2nd Amendment actually has nothing to do with fighting tyranny at all.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HogRiderreturns 06/11/17 3:24:47 PM #41:	3rd_Best_Master posted... HogRiderreturns posted... 3rd_Best_Master posted... 2nd Amendment advocates will defend tyranny so long as it's happening to liberals? Lol wat Why should gun people stand up to something that liberals won't. If it was something that was actually terrible you should have no problem picking up and fighting too. Don't expect the gun people to do the dirty work while the liberals just sit back and try to take the credit. So then the 2nd Amendment actually has nothing to do with fighting tyranny at all. It does, but everyone has to pull their weight. You can't just cry about problems and expect the gun people to just do the work themselves. --- http://i.imgur.com/wuFm3hd.jpg - My Hash Brownies. http://i.imgur.com/mQ7syoS.gif http://i.imgur.com/lY3erBp.jpg <cite>HogRiderreturns posted [p:880848790] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HogRiderreturns posted...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote> 2nd Amendment advocates will defend tyranny so long as it's happening to liberals? Lol wat</quote> Why should gun people stand up to something that liberals won't. If it was something that was actually terrible you should have no problem picking up and fighting too. Don't expect the gun people to do the dirty work while the liberals just sit back and try to take the credit.</quote> So then the 2nd Amendment actually has nothing to do with fighting tyranny at all.</quote> It does, but everyone has to pull their weight. You can't just cry about problems and expect the gun people to just do the work themselves.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
3rd_Best_Master 06/11/17 3:26:09 PM #42:	HogRiderreturns posted... 3rd_Best_Master posted... HogRiderreturns posted... 3rd_Best_Master posted... 2nd Amendment advocates will defend tyranny so long as it's happening to liberals? Lol wat Why should gun people stand up to something that liberals won't. If it was something that was actually terrible you should have no problem picking up and fighting too. Don't expect the gun people to do the dirty work while the liberals just sit back and try to take the credit. So then the 2nd Amendment actually has nothing to do with fighting tyranny at all. It does, but everyone has to pull their weight. You can't just cry about problems and expect the gun people to just do the work themselves. So I'll ask again, which tyrannies is the 2nd Amendment meant to prevent? Your trolling has been pretty amusing so far, but actually answer the question this time. --- You've fought the strongest, the second strongest, the fourth strongest, and the weakest master! Now you see the true advantage of being third strongest master! <cite>3rd_Best_Master posted [p:880848868] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>HogRiderreturns posted...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HogRiderreturns posted...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote> 2nd Amendment advocates will defend tyranny so long as it's happening to liberals? Lol wat</quote> Why should gun people stand up to something that liberals won't. If it was something that was actually terrible you should have no problem picking up and fighting too. Don't expect the gun people to do the dirty work while the liberals just sit back and try to take the credit.</quote> So then the 2nd Amendment actually has nothing to do with fighting tyranny at all.</quote> It does, but everyone has to pull their weight. You can't just cry about problems and expect the gun people to just do the work themselves.</quote> So I'll ask again, which tyrannies is the 2nd Amendment meant to prevent? Your trolling has been pretty amusing so far, but actually answer the question this time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HogRiderreturns 06/11/17 3:29:18 PM #43:	3rd_Best_Master posted... HogRiderreturns posted... 3rd_Best_Master posted... HogRiderreturns posted... 3rd_Best_Master posted... 2nd Amendment advocates will defend tyranny so long as it's happening to liberals? Lol wat Why should gun people stand up to something that liberals won't. If it was something that was actually terrible you should have no problem picking up and fighting too. Don't expect the gun people to do the dirty work while the liberals just sit back and try to take the credit. So then the 2nd Amendment actually has nothing to do with fighting tyranny at all. It does, but everyone has to pull their weight. You can't just cry about problems and expect the gun people to just do the work themselves. So I'll ask again, which tyrannies is the 2nd Amendment meant to prevent? Your trolling has been pretty amusing so far, but actually answer the question this time. Making sure we don't end up with dictators and violent military oppression nationwide against citizens of the US. Also in case we ever have a Red Dawn situation. --- http://i.imgur.com/wuFm3hd.jpg - My Hash Brownies. http://i.imgur.com/mQ7syoS.gif http://i.imgur.com/lY3erBp.jpg <cite>HogRiderreturns posted [p:880849038] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HogRiderreturns posted...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HogRiderreturns posted...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote> 2nd Amendment advocates will defend tyranny so long as it's happening to liberals? Lol wat</quote> Why should gun people stand up to something that liberals won't. If it was something that was actually terrible you should have no problem picking up and fighting too. Don't expect the gun people to do the dirty work while the liberals just sit back and try to take the credit.</quote> So then the 2nd Amendment actually has nothing to do with fighting tyranny at all.</quote> It does, but everyone has to pull their weight. You can't just cry about problems and expect the gun people to just do the work themselves.</quote> So I'll ask again, which tyrannies is the 2nd Amendment meant to prevent? Your trolling has been pretty amusing so far, but actually answer the question this time.</quote> Making sure we don't end up with dictators and violent military oppression nationwide against citizens of the US. Also in case we ever have a Red Dawn situation.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
3rd_Best_Master 06/11/17 3:31:35 PM #44:	HogRiderreturns posted... Making sure we don't end up with dictators and violent military oppression nationwide against citizens of the US. And where were they when Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and being put into camps and having their livelihood destroyed? --- You've fought the strongest, the second strongest, the fourth strongest, and the weakest master! Now you see the true advantage of being third strongest master! <cite>3rd_Best_Master posted [p:880849149] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>HogRiderreturns posted...</cite> <quote>Making sure we don't end up with dictators and violent military oppression nationwide against citizens of the US. </quote> And where were they when Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and being put into camps and having their livelihood destroyed?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HogRiderreturns 06/11/17 3:32:56 PM #45:	3rd_Best_Master posted... HogRiderreturns posted... Making sure we don't end up with dictators and violent military oppression nationwide against citizens of the US. And where were they when Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and being put into camps and having their livelihood destroyed? Same place the liberals were. Going about their lives. --- http://i.imgur.com/wuFm3hd.jpg - My Hash Brownies. http://i.imgur.com/mQ7syoS.gif http://i.imgur.com/lY3erBp.jpg <cite>HogRiderreturns posted [p:880849222] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HogRiderreturns posted...</cite> <quote>Making sure we don't end up with dictators and violent military oppression nationwide against citizens of the US. </quote> And where were they when Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and being put into camps and having their livelihood destroyed?</quote> Same place the liberals were. Going about their lives.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
3rd_Best_Master 06/11/17 3:37:57 PM #46:	HogRiderreturns posted... 3rd_Best_Master posted... HogRiderreturns posted... Making sure we don't end up with dictators and violent military oppression nationwide against citizens of the US. And where were they when Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and being put into camps and having their livelihood destroyed? Same place the liberals were. Going about their lives. So just more trolling, gotcha. --- You've fought the strongest, the second strongest, the fourth strongest, and the weakest master! Now you see the true advantage of being third strongest master! <cite>3rd_Best_Master posted [p:880849514] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>HogRiderreturns posted...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HogRiderreturns posted...</cite> <quote>Making sure we don't end up with dictators and violent military oppression nationwide against citizens of the US. </quote> And where were they when Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and being put into camps and having their livelihood destroyed?</quote> Same place the liberals were. Going about their lives.</quote> So just more trolling, gotcha.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Krave_ 06/11/17 3:38:09 PM #47:	Can't people just say that literally everything has roots in racism? --- Am I seducing or being seduced? <cite>_Krave_ posted [p:880849523] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote>Can't people just say that literally everything has roots in racism?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HogRiderreturns 06/11/17 3:42:26 PM #48:	3rd_Best_Master posted... So just more trolling, gotcha. No, if it was a serious cause then liberals should have had no problem with picking up a gun and fighting the tyranny. You can't make other people do your dirty work for you. It is united we stand, not do this while I sit on my ass. --- http://i.imgur.com/wuFm3hd.jpg - My Hash Brownies. http://i.imgur.com/mQ7syoS.gif http://i.imgur.com/lY3erBp.jpg <cite>HogRiderreturns posted [p:880849782] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote>So just more trolling, gotcha.</quote> No, if it was a serious cause then liberals should have had no problem with picking up a gun and fighting the tyranny. You can't make other people do your dirty work for you. It is united we stand, not do this while I sit on my ass.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trigg3rH4ppy 06/11/17 3:42:49 PM #49:	3rd_Best_Master posted... HogRiderreturns posted... Making sure we don't end up with dictators and violent military oppression nationwide against citizens of the US. And where were they when Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and being put into camps and having their livelihood destroyed? Are you dull? --- ~A little nonsense, now and then, is relished by the wisest men ~ TWSSted since~ 3/27/12 https://i.imgur.com/zlaENmx.png <cite>Trigg3rH4ppy posted [p:880849807] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HogRiderreturns posted...</cite> <quote>Making sure we don't end up with dictators and violent military oppression nationwide against citizens of the US. </quote> And where were they when Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and being put into camps and having their livelihood destroyed?</quote> Are you dull?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Malcrasternus 06/11/17 4:04:20 PM #50:	_Krave_ posted... Can't people just say that literally everything has roots in racism? That's racist. --- http://i.imgtc.com/tUK3LwiHnb.jpg 4/15/1951 - 3/18/2014 "But not forgotten." <cite>Malcrasternus posted [p:880850988] in C/D: Was t... [t:75446575]...</cite> <quote><cite>_Krave_ posted...</cite> <quote>Can't people just say that literally everything has roots in racism?</quote> That's racist.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > C/D: Was the 2nd Amendment a tool to help preserve slavery? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > C/D: Was the 2nd Amendment a tool to help preserve slavery?