Current Events > Study Confirms That Ugly/Average Guys Not Dating Material. Personality Irelevant

(+) Yeah! (+)

80/80. Irrelevant*

Researchers at Eastern Connecticut State University looked at the mate preferences of 80 young women, aged 15 to 29, while also having 61 of their mothers weigh in.
also having 61 of their mothers weigh in.

The participants were presented with photographs of men varying in both attractiveness and described as one of three dispositions:“friendly,” “pleasing,” or “respectful.”

A new study finds that women don’t view unattractive men as “dating material,” no matter how great their other qualities may be.

Additional trait profiles were explained for each of the three dispositions. Men labeled “respectful” included the traits ‘respectful, trustworthy, and honest;’ the ‘friendly’ men were labeled ‘friendly, dependable, and mature;’ and the ‘pleasing” profile meant that the man was ‘of a pleasing disposition, ambitious, and intelligent.’

Simply put, men viewed as unattractive were not viewed as potential suitors, no matter the level of other redeeming qualities that accompanied their photos. Those with favorable personality traits that were ranked highly were at least moderately attractive.


%u201CWe conclude that a minimum level of physical attractiveness is a necessity for both women and their mothers,%u201D says lead researcher Madeleine Fugère in a journal news release.

https://www.studyfinds.org/unattractive-men-dating-material-study/

Link to study
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0092-x


TLDR: In order to be dating material, you need to be attractive

Good personality means nothing if you don't have good looks to back it up.

Good thing attractiveness is subjective.

Goto, I think you should take a shit in this topic.
---

80 women =/= every woman everywhere.
---

Go_Totodile posted...

Good thing attractiveness is subjective.

No it isn't man. No it isn't.

1. What people vocally claim they're into doesn't matter.

2. No amount of studies is going to counter all the couples where an ugly person is with an average or attractive person.

Mernardi posted...

Goto, I think you should take a shit in this topic.

Alright.

*takes a MASSIVE shit in this topic*

Duncanwii posted...

80 women =/= every woman everywhere.

Wait the study only used 80 women? lmfao what a shit tier study.

Please go outside, Crow.

Do you think having their mothers involved changed their answers?
---

Duncanwii posted...

80 women =/= every woman everywhere.

typical cope. There is no hope. You can't have a good dating life if you aren't male model material

We are all doomed. Majority of CE'ers aren't even Model tier. And because of that, we are fucked for life in dating.

Sojy posted...

1. What people vocally claim they're into doesn't matter.

2. No amount of studies is going to counter all the couples where an ugly person is with an average or attractive person.

I've never seen this ever happen unless the dude was rich or famous

1. There are plenty of unattractive people in happy relationships

2. There is a difference between being unattractive and not taking care of yourself to present an image of someone worth dating
---

Crow0000 posted...

Duncanwii posted...

80 women =/= every woman everywhere.

typical cope. There is no hope. You can't have a good dating life if you aren't male model material

We are all doomed. Majority of CE'ers aren't even Model tier. And because of that, we are fucked for life in dating.

Then how do I have a steady gf? Hmm?
---

Duncanwii posted...

Crow0000 posted...

Duncanwii posted...

80 women =/= every woman everywhere.

typical cope. There is no hope. You can't have a good dating life if you aren't male model material

We are all doomed. Majority of CE'ers aren't even Model tier. And because of that, we are fucked for life in dating.

Then how do I have a steady gf? Hmm?

Maybe you're attractive and have model tier looks?

gamefaqs users on suicide watch
---

Crow0000 posted...

80/80. Irrelevant*

Ridiculous. It doesn't count if you have a spell a word wrong.
---

Its a good thing I'm sexy AF
---

Crow0000 posted...

Duncanwii posted...

Crow0000 posted...

Duncanwii posted...

80 women =/= every woman everywhere.

typical cope. There is no hope. You can't have a good dating life if you aren't male model material

We are all doomed. Majority of CE'ers aren't even Model tier. And because of that, we are fucked for life in dating.

Then how do I have a steady gf? Hmm?

Maybe you're attractive and have model tier looks?

No I don't, I really dont.
---

EnragedSlith posted...

1. There are plenty of unattractive people in happy relationships

2. There is a difference between being unattractive and not taking care of yourself to present an image of someone worth dating

You can take care of yourself all you want and put up a good presentation, and still be unattractive. Lacking good facial structure is typically what makes people unattractive, no matter what.

looked at the mate preferences of 80 young women, aged 15 to 29, while also having 61 of their mothers weigh in.

That's a super low sample size.

The participants were presented with photographs of men varying in both attractiveness and described as one of three dispositions:“friendly,” “pleasing,” or “respectful.”

Of course looks are going to matter when the study is showing people photographs to rate. Just because you label the photograph with a trait doesn't really matter, because there is no way to know for certain. Also all 3 traits are positive, if they included negative traits you might see the women decline attractive people with negative traits.

This study doesn't really prove anything as real life interactions with real people are much different than looking at photographs.
---

The reality is that men are fucked. This world would be perfect if every male had great facial strucutre and model tier looks

instead the majority of us are fucked. Screwed! No matter what, some of us can never achieve brad pitt tier looks. No matter what, none of us can be "Studs" and attract women with our looks

and it sucks.

You can't sum up confidence and charisma in a few words and it doesn't sound like they used that as an optional quality.
---

In another sign that people tend to judge one another based on physical appearance, a new study claims that women tend to exhibit bias against unattractive men if they “mess up,” while being more forgiving toward attractive men. The researchers, from Eastern Kentucky University, claimed that women perceive men based on how handsome and attractive they are.

The study of 170 college-age women revealed that unattractive men earned a “negative double bias” upon violating a social norm. However, handsome men did not earn a negative bias if they broke a social norm or did something wrong.

http://www.ibtimes.com/women-less-forgiving-toward-unattractive-men-study-1943420

Crowp00p is a bitter foreveralone anti-women gimmick

he's faker than Kim Kardashian's ass
move along
---

People give hot people special privileges and more chances so they can keep them around, while people give ugly people a slim chance, but no loss if they reveal they're an idiot not worth keeping them around. Common sense. Ugly people should be striving for that slim chance if that's all they have to work with, instead of just giving up all hope.

MegaButterfree posted...

Go_Totodile posted...

Good thing attractiveness is subjective.

uh huh yeah ok

MegaButterfree posted...

Crow0000 posted...

MegaButterfree posted...

Go_Totodile posted...

Good thing attractiveness is subjective.

uh huh yeah ok

I just read some of your other posts itt.

Go back to /r/incel lol.

A fake pity party? You can make a troll thread that's better than "Woe is me."

Give it another shot.

Good.
---

This is why you become a baller shot caller.
---

Mystere posted...

A fake pity party? You can make a troll thread that's better than "Woe is me."

Give it another shot.

It's not fake if the situations are real