Poll of the Day > Today's poll is fat shaming

Topic List	Page List: 1
Muffinz0rz 07/10/17 5:46:28 PM #1:	--- Not changing this sig until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) BRAVELY DEFAULT: 1075 - 0844 - 9134 + FS: Pumkaboo, Lampent, Dusclops. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:882674791] in Today's po... [t:75551258]...</cite> <quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 07/10/17 7:14:57 PM #2:	nothing wrong with fat shaming --- Kill From The Shadows. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:882679614] in Today's po... [t:75551258]...</cite> <quote>nothing wrong with fat shaming</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ReggieTheReckless 07/10/17 7:18:14 PM #3:	Ha, fatty --- http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y199/Kiyala/GM.gif http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y199/Kiyala/SB.gif http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y199/Kiyala/Rt.jpg <cite>ReggieTheReckless posted [p:882679795] in Today's po... [t:75551258]...</cite> <quote>Ha, fatty</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheGreatNoodles 07/10/17 7:22:19 PM #4:	Fat: Adj: 1. "Having a large amount of excess flesh" Adj: 2. "Large in bulk or circumference" Given that the original model is larger than the newer ones, it's 'fatter' according to meaning 2 without any negative implications towards people, animals or things. Also, given that the newer models could do the exact same things, but whilst smaller, one could argue (without any negative implications towards people), that the older model had 'excess 'flesh'', hence meaning 1 also fits. ~~I know this is a joke topic, but wanted to give a joke reply.~~ --- Mario Maker https://supermariomakerbookmark.nintendo.net/profile/thegreatnoodle Noodles Games: Part 1; http://txt.do/daqoz Part 2; http://txt.do/daq65 <cite>TheGreatNoodles posted [p:882680018] in Today's po... [t:75551258]...</cite> <quote>Fat: Adj: 1. "Having a large amount of excess flesh" Adj: 2. "Large in bulk or circumference" Given that the original model is larger than the newer ones, it's 'fatter' according to meaning 2 without any negative implications towards people, animals or things. Also, given that the newer models could do the exact same things, but whilst smaller, one could argue (without any negative implications towards people), that the older model had 'excess 'flesh'', hence meaning 1 also fits. I know this is a joke topic, but wanted to give a joke reply.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1