Current Events > Four scientists respond to Google memo.

Topic List	Page List: 1
Transcendentia 08/07/17 11:37:01 PM #1:	https://web.archive.org/web/20170808013732/http://quillette.com/2017/08/07/google-memo-four-scientists-respond Sharing it via web archive because the main site is being inundated with traffic. The tl;dr is that they generally agree that the article was fair, backed by evidence, and that he raised some good points. --- Humans are aliens too dumbass - clearaflagrantj <cite>Transcendentia posted [p:884377311] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote>https://web.archive.org/web/20170808013732/http://quillette.com/2017/08/07/google-memo-four-scientists-respond Sharing it via web archive because the main site is being inundated with traffic. The tl;dr is that they generally agree that the article was fair, backed by evidence, and that he raised some good points.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
StucklnMyPants 08/07/17 11:43:31 PM #2:	I'm still shaking. --- The first principle is that you must not fool yourself --- and you are the easiest person to fool. <cite>StucklnMyPants posted [p:884377629] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote>I'm still shaking.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#3	Post #3 was unavailable or deleted.
EndOfDiscOne 08/08/17 3:55:12 PM #4:	Great article. The first guy mirrors about everything that I argued in another topic. --- Ulti was right <cite>EndOfDiscOne posted [p:884414109] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote>Great article. The first guy mirrors about everything that I argued in another topic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/08/17 3:56:31 PM #5:	byron posted... Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns? when they support liberal views you should support them ofc otherwise they are obviously biased --- sigless user is me or am I? <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:884414191] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote>Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns?</quote> when they support liberal views you should support them ofc otherwise they are obviously biased</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 08/08/17 3:57:15 PM #6:	Are you a Snowden supporter TC? Or a Chelsea Manning one? If you have different opinions on the two what are the differences? --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:884414242] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote>Are you a Snowden supporter TC? Or a Chelsea Manning one? If you have different opinions on the two what are the differences?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#7	Post #7 was unavailable or deleted.
Gojak_v3 08/08/17 6:03:17 PM #8:	byron posted... Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns? Well since they went against the liberal narrative I guess you have yer answer for this example at least. You on the other hand seem to be upset with their conclusion. So you anti-science now? --- http://i.imgtc.com/rIZcfGBEt8.png <cite>Gojak_v3 posted [p:884421633] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote>Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns?</quote> Well since they went against the liberal narrative I guess you have yer answer for this example at least. You on the other hand seem to be upset with their conclusion. So you anti-science now?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#9	Post #9 was unavailable or deleted.
darkphoenix181 08/08/17 6:10:20 PM #10:	byron posted... darkphoenix181 posted... byron posted... Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns? when they support liberal views you should support them ofc otherwise they are obviously biased So in this case because they're against "liberals" that means they're good? Got it. re-read what I said but that was a funny retort gives more credence to my comment --- sigless user is me or am I? <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:884422044] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote> Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns?</quote> when they support liberal views you should support them ofc otherwise they are obviously biased</quote> So in this case because they're against "liberals" that means they're good? Got it.</quote> re-read what I said but that was a funny retort gives more credence to my comment</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#11	Post #11 was unavailable or deleted.
darkphoenix181 08/08/17 6:13:32 PM #12:	byron posted... darkphoenix181 posted... byron posted... darkphoenix181 posted... byron posted... Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns? when they support liberal views you should support them ofc otherwise they are obviously biased So in this case because they're against "liberals" that means they're good? Got it. re-read what I said but that was a funny retort gives more credence to my comment Re-read what I said. You've given much more credence to my comment. If scientists support liberals then they're bad but if they don't then they're good? Got it. no I said if they support liberals then they are good --- sigless user is me or am I? <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:884422236] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote> Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns? </quote> when they support liberal views you should support them ofc otherwise they are obviously biased </quote> So in this case because they're against "liberals" that means they're good? Got it.</quote> re-read what I said but that was a funny retort gives more credence to my comment</quote> Re-read what I said. You've given much more credence to my comment. If scientists support liberals then they're bad but if they don't then they're good? Got it.</quote> no I said if they support liberals then they are good</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
myztikrice 08/08/17 6:13:52 PM #13:	I cannot speak to the atmosphere at Google, but: 1. Give that the author Can't even proofread their opening paragraph, yawn --- "Why are you always smiling?" "'Cause it's all so f***in' hysterical." <cite>myztikrice posted [p:884422255] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote><quote>I cannot speak to the atmosphere at Google, but: 1. Give that the author</quote> Can't even proofread their opening paragraph, yawn</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 08/08/17 6:15:19 PM #14:	byron posted... Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns? I'm confused, is your argument that these specific scientists responding to these specific claims are wrong? Or are you hoping to dodge the issue entirely by trying to pivot the discussion from Google's practices to "the right" --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:884422346] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote>Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns?</quote> I'm confused, is your argument that these specific scientists responding to these specific claims are wrong? Or are you hoping to dodge the issue entirely by trying to pivot the discussion from Google's practices to "the right"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gamer99z 08/08/17 6:17:27 PM #15:	byron posted... Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns? If they say something you agree with, they're infallible. If they say something you don't agree with they're just a liberal echo chamber. --- "You need to lay off the peanut-butthurt and u-jelly sandwiches" - Neon Octopus <cite>Gamer99z posted [p:884422494] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote>Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns?</quote> If they say something you agree with, they're infallible. If they say something you don't agree with they're just a liberal echo chamber.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
itachi15243 08/08/17 6:21:08 PM #16:	s0nicfan posted... byron posted... Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns? I'm confused, is your argument that these specific scientists responding to these specific claims are wrong? Or are you hoping to dodge the issue entirely by trying to pivot the discussion from Google's practices to "the right" I'm pretty sure he's bitching about how liberal scientists say that global warming is real, there's nothing wrong with vaccinations, and they're all believed and trusted, but conservative fringe scientists who believe the craziest shit aren't trusted and "it's not fair" or something. --- I do drawings and stuff https://www.fiverr.com/blueblitz <cite>itachi15243 posted [p:884422701] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote>Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns?</quote> I'm confused, is your argument that these specific scientists responding to these specific claims are wrong? Or are you hoping to dodge the issue entirely by trying to pivot the discussion from Google's practices to "the right"</quote> I'm pretty sure he's bitching about how liberal scientists say that global warming is real, there's nothing wrong with vaccinations, and they're all believed and trusted, but conservative fringe scientists who believe the craziest shit aren't trusted and "it's not fair" or something.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 08/08/17 6:22:31 PM #17:	itachi15243 posted... s0nicfan posted... byron posted... Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns? I'm confused, is your argument that these specific scientists responding to these specific claims are wrong? Or are you hoping to dodge the issue entirely by trying to pivot the discussion from Google's practices to "the right" I'm pretty sure he's bitching about how liberal scientists say that global warming is real, there's nothing wrong with vaccinations, and they're all believed and trusted, but conservative fringe scientists who believe the craziest shit aren't trusted and "it's not fair" or something. wow @byron is an anti-vaccer!? --- sigless user is me or am I? <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:884422777] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote><cite>itachi15243 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote>Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns?</quote> I'm confused, is your argument that these specific scientists responding to these specific claims are wrong? Or are you hoping to dodge the issue entirely by trying to pivot the discussion from Google's practices to "the right"</quote> I'm pretty sure he's bitching about how liberal scientists say that global warming is real, there's nothing wrong with vaccinations, and they're all believed and trusted, but conservative fringe scientists who believe the craziest shit aren't trusted and "it's not fair" or something.</quote> wow @byron is an anti-vaccer!?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EndOfDiscOne 08/08/17 6:26:27 PM #18:	Byron I think you're making the false assumption that people here are climate change deniers. But that's not the case. Here we have 1)people who support science and 2) people who support science as long as they like what science says. --- Ulti was right <cite>EndOfDiscOne posted [p:884423040] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote>Byron I think you're making the false assumption that people here are climate change deniers. But that's not the case. Here we have 1)people who support science and 2) people who support science as long as they like what science says.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#19	Post #19 was unavailable or deleted.
itachi15243 08/08/17 6:28:40 PM #20:	darkphoenix181 posted... itachi15243 posted... s0nicfan posted... byron posted... Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns? I'm confused, is your argument that these specific scientists responding to these specific claims are wrong? Or are you hoping to dodge the issue entirely by trying to pivot the discussion from Google's practices to "the right" I'm pretty sure he's bitching about how liberal scientists say that global warming is real, there's nothing wrong with vaccinations, and they're all believed and trusted, but conservative fringe scientists who believe the craziest shit aren't trusted and "it's not fair" or something. wow @byron is an anti-vaccer!? I don't know, It was just a random example. --- I do drawings and stuff https://www.fiverr.com/blueblitz <cite>itachi15243 posted [p:884423151] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>itachi15243 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote>Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns?</quote> I'm confused, is your argument that these specific scientists responding to these specific claims are wrong? Or are you hoping to dodge the issue entirely by trying to pivot the discussion from Google's practices to "the right"</quote> I'm pretty sure he's bitching about how liberal scientists say that global warming is real, there's nothing wrong with vaccinations, and they're all believed and trusted, but conservative fringe scientists who believe the craziest shit aren't trusted and "it's not fair" or something.</quote> wow @byron is an anti-vaccer!?</quote> I don't know, It was just a random example.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#21	Post #21 was unavailable or deleted.
darkphoenix181 08/08/17 6:29:06 PM #22:	byron posted... darkphoenix181 posted... itachi15243 posted... s0nicfan posted... byron posted... Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns? I'm confused, is your argument that these specific scientists responding to these specific claims are wrong? Or are you hoping to dodge the issue entirely by trying to pivot the discussion from Google's practices to "the right" I'm pretty sure he's bitching about how liberal scientists say that global warming is real, there's nothing wrong with vaccinations, and they're all believed and trusted, but conservative fringe scientists who believe the craziest shit aren't trusted and "it's not fair" or something. wow @byron is an anti-vaccer!? Why would I need vaccines on our flat earth? can I sig this? --- sigless user is me or am I? <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:884423170] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>itachi15243 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote>Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns?</quote> I'm confused, is your argument that these specific scientists responding to these specific claims are wrong? Or are you hoping to dodge the issue entirely by trying to pivot the discussion from Google's practices to "the right"</quote> I'm pretty sure he's bitching about how liberal scientists say that global warming is real, there's nothing wrong with vaccinations, and they're all believed and trusted, but conservative fringe scientists who believe the craziest shit aren't trusted and "it's not fair" or something.</quote> wow @byron is an anti-vaccer!?</quote> Why would I need vaccines on our flat earth?</quote> can I sig this?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#23	Post #23 was unavailable or deleted.
darkphoenix181 08/08/17 6:30:02 PM #24:	byron posted... darkphoenix181 posted... byron posted... darkphoenix181 posted... itachi15243 posted... s0nicfan posted... byron posted... Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns? I'm confused, is your argument that these specific scientists responding to these specific claims are wrong? Or are you hoping to dodge the issue entirely by trying to pivot the discussion from Google's practices to "the right" I'm pretty sure he's bitching about how liberal scientists say that global warming is real, there's nothing wrong with vaccinations, and they're all believed and trusted, but conservative fringe scientists who believe the craziest shit aren't trusted and "it's not fair" or something. wow @byron is an anti-vaccer!? Why would I need vaccines on our flat earth? can I sig this? @byron Absolutely not. why not? are you ashamed? --- sigless user is me or am I? <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:884423224] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>itachi15243 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote>Can someone explain to me when scientists can be trusted and when they're just indoctrinated liberal pawns?</quote> I'm confused, is your argument that these specific scientists responding to these specific claims are wrong? Or are you hoping to dodge the issue entirely by trying to pivot the discussion from Google's practices to "the right"</quote> I'm pretty sure he's bitching about how liberal scientists say that global warming is real, there's nothing wrong with vaccinations, and they're all believed and trusted, but conservative fringe scientists who believe the craziest shit aren't trusted and "it's not fair" or something.</quote> wow @byron is an anti-vaccer!?</quote> Why would I need vaccines on our flat earth?</quote> can I sig this? @byron</quote> Absolutely not.</quote> why not? are you ashamed?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sexypwnstar 08/08/17 6:31:21 PM #25:	what a meltdown --- http://i.imgur.com/Su4g5.jpg http://i.imgur.com/21DiJ.jpg <cite>Sexypwnstar posted [p:884423292] in Four scien... [t:75648605]...</cite> <quote>what a meltdown</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#26	Post #26 was unavailable or deleted.
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Four scientists respond to Google memo. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Four scientists respond to Google memo.