Current Events > Racist Indian Elephant serial killer finally put down (murdered 15 humans)

Topic List
Page List: 1
Ammonitida
08/13/17 10:44:58 AM
#1:


http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/12/elephant-murdered-15-people-finally-killed-just-before-world-elephant-day/

An Indian elephant that has killed 15 people since March was finally killed Friday night.

Nawab Shafat Ali Khan — one of India’s best hunters — and his hunting team went after the elephant, shooting it point blank to ensure that it could not survive the bullets, according to Yahoo News. Indian authorities directed Khan and his men to take down the elephant after it killed 15 people in two Indian towns in March.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds
08/13/17 10:47:20 AM
#2:


Khan told reporters. “I prefer tranquilizing animals. But if it doesn’t happen, killing is the last resort.”

*thumbs up*
... Copied to Clipboard!
thompsontalker7
08/13/17 10:48:51 AM
#3:


The hunters had tried to tranquilize and capture the animal for a week, but after many unsuccessful attempts, officials gave the team permission to kill the elephant.

Fair, next

Wonder what bullet you use to take down that thing
---
You haven't set a signature for the message boards yet. Might wanna get on that, yeah?
... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds
08/13/17 10:50:39 AM
#4:


thompsontalker7 posted...
Wonder what bullet you use to take down that thing


hjz0COg
... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy
08/13/17 10:57:37 AM
#5:


Skye Reynolds posted...
thompsontalker7 posted...
Wonder what bullet you use to take down that thing


hjz0COg


lol
---
"I can i i everything else," Bob reportedly said. Alice replied: "Balls have zero to me to me to me..." (Facebook AIs talking to each other)
... Copied to Clipboard!
Vicious_Dios
08/13/17 11:00:55 AM
#6:


They should've put it down after killing the first person. They waited too long.
---
S / K / Y / N / E
Twitch/YouTube/GT: Adzeta
... Copied to Clipboard!
Endofall
08/13/17 9:18:45 PM
#7:


ImTheMacheteGuy posted...
Skye Reynolds posted...
thompsontalker7 posted...
Wonder what bullet you use to take down that thing


hjz0COg


lol
... Copied to Clipboard!
SaltyWet
08/13/17 9:24:16 PM
#8:


How are they sure they got the right elephant?
---
SaltyWet
... Copied to Clipboard!
Ammonitida
08/14/17 12:56:38 PM
#9:


SaltyWet posted...
How are they sure they got the right elephant?


If the murders stop.....
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kelystic
08/16/17 2:21:26 AM
#11:


... Copied to Clipboard!
IHeartRadiation
08/16/17 2:22:37 AM
#12:


Only the most obvious and vain of serial killers calls murder victims "humans"

Isn't that right TC
---
I enjoy the finer points of ham
... Copied to Clipboard!
kingdrake2
08/16/17 2:23:16 AM
#13:


Kelystic posted...
No trial?


the evidence was there. it had a trial and was found unworthy.

reason: too many people died....
---
Chapped ass sucks. Deliver me sweet release, Kaopectate-.Alucard188
... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate
08/16/17 2:27:19 AM
#14:


How about let it live it's life as a wild animal? Was that not an option?

Don't go near the thing, or relocate it hundreds of miles away from human civilization and let it live out it's life.

If a bunch of strangers just showed up on my property I might get a little aggressive also. The animal didn't choose to have humans invade it's territory.

Not gonna lie, i'm torn here. I'm not sure I agree with this.
---
Ten million dollars on a losing campaign
Twenty million starving and writhing in pain
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kelystic
08/16/17 2:30:09 AM
#15:


Now imagine if this happened in America.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber
08/16/17 2:30:38 AM
#16:


Wait ... why is the elephant racist?
... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate
08/16/17 2:31:06 AM
#17:


Dash_Harber posted...
Wait ... why is the elephant racist?

It only killed Indian people.
---
Ten million dollars on a losing campaign
Twenty million starving and writhing in pain
... Copied to Clipboard!
Vicious_Dios
08/16/17 2:31:31 AM
#18:


MabusIncarnate posted...
How about let it live it's life as a wild animal? Was that not an option?

Don't go near the thing, or relocate it hundreds of miles away from human civilization and let it live out it's life.

If a bunch of strangers just showed up on my property I might get a little aggressive also. The animal didn't choose to have humans invade it's territory.

Not gonna lie, i'm torn here. I'm not sure I agree with this.


Read the damn article.

They stated that that specific elephant was stalking humans, an abnormal behaviour pattern in contrast to the other packiderms co-habitating with the local tribes.

They opted to tranquilize the damn thing, but lethal force was necessary.
---
S / K / Y / N / E
Twitch/YouTube/GT: Adzeta
... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber
08/16/17 2:32:57 AM
#19:


MabusIncarnate posted...
Dash_Harber posted...
Wait ... why is the elephant racist?

It only killed Indian people.

Wasn't it ... in India?
... Copied to Clipboard!
MachoManSavage
08/16/17 2:32:59 AM
#20:


MabusIncarnate posted...
How about let it live it's life as a wild animal? Was that not an option?

Don't go near the thing, or relocate it hundreds of miles away from human civilization and let it live out it's life.

If a bunch of strangers just showed up on my property I might get a little aggressive also. The animal didn't choose to have humans invade it's territory.

Not gonna lie, i'm torn here. I'm not sure I agree with this.


Holy shit dude. People like you terrify and annoy me to no end.

It's a fucking elephant that killed 15 of your species. And you're pondering if the thing should live? Come on dude. I don't care how "cute" our Disney warped perception is of baby animals. Biologically I look out for my own species. And you should to.

BTW, the worst people ever are those who downvote videos on YT of lions eating prey. And complaining why the camera men didn't intervene and save the antelope (or whatever it is). Like damn, you do realize Lions will die if they don't eat, right?
---
A proud wrestling Smark, because we know better than you.
... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate
08/16/17 2:34:10 AM
#21:


Vicious_Dios posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
How about let it live it's life as a wild animal? Was that not an option?

Don't go near the thing, or relocate it hundreds of miles away from human civilization and let it live out it's life.

If a bunch of strangers just showed up on my property I might get a little aggressive also. The animal didn't choose to have humans invade it's territory.

Not gonna lie, i'm torn here. I'm not sure I agree with this.


Read the damn article.

They stated that that specific elephant was stalking humans, an abnormal behaviour pattern in contrast to the other packiderms co-habitating with the local tribes.

They opted to tranquilize the dam thing, but lethal force was necessary.

The tribes that invaded it's territory. Also, tranquilizing isn't the only, end all option to subdue an animal and transport it elsewhere. I did read the article, in it's entirety, and stand by my statement. Just because it didn't run with the pack and allow humans to live among them doesn't make it a vicious animal.
---
Ten million dollars on a losing campaign
Twenty million starving and writhing in pain
... Copied to Clipboard!
Vicious_Dios
08/16/17 2:35:37 AM
#22:


MabusIncarnate posted...
Vicious_Dios posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
How about let it live it's life as a wild animal? Was that not an option?

Don't go near the thing, or relocate it hundreds of miles away from human civilization and let it live out it's life.

If a bunch of strangers just showed up on my property I might get a little aggressive also. The animal didn't choose to have humans invade it's territory.

Not gonna lie, i'm torn here. I'm not sure I agree with this.


Read the damn article.

They stated that that specific elephant was stalking humans, an abnormal behaviour pattern in contrast to the other packiderms co-habitating with the local tribes.

They opted to tranquilize the dam thing, but lethal force was necessary.

The tribes that invaded it's territory. Also, tranquilizing isn't the only, end all option to subdue an animal and transport it elsewhere. I did read the article, in it's entirety, and stand by my statement. Just because it didn't run with the pack and allow humans to live among them doesn't make it a vicious animal.


Tell that to the 15 victims lying in their graves.
---
S / K / Y / N / E
Twitch/YouTube/GT: Adzeta
... Copied to Clipboard!
MachoManSavage
08/16/17 2:37:02 AM
#23:


MabusIncarnate posted...
Vicious_Dios posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
How about let it live it's life as a wild animal? Was that not an option?

Don't go near the thing, or relocate it hundreds of miles away from human civilization and let it live out it's life.

If a bunch of strangers just showed up on my property I might get a little aggressive also. The animal didn't choose to have humans invade it's territory.

Not gonna lie, i'm torn here. I'm not sure I agree with this.


Read the damn article.

They stated that that specific elephant was stalking humans, an abnormal behaviour pattern in contrast to the other packiderms co-habitating with the local tribes.

They opted to tranquilize the dam thing, but lethal force was necessary.

The tribes that invaded it's territory. Also, tranquilizing isn't the only, end all option to subdue an animal and transport it elsewhere. I did read the article, in it's entirety, and stand by my statement. Just because it didn't run with the pack and allow humans to live among them doesn't make it a vicious animal.


Would you kill a lone mosquito carrying AIDs in your vicinity?

Would you kill a charging grizzly running toward your loved one? (In the woods)
---
A proud wrestling Smark, because we know better than you.
... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate
08/16/17 2:38:58 AM
#24:


Vicious_Dios posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
Vicious_Dios posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
How about let it live it's life as a wild animal? Was that not an option?

Don't go near the thing, or relocate it hundreds of miles away from human civilization and let it live out it's life.

If a bunch of strangers just showed up on my property I might get a little aggressive also. The animal didn't choose to have humans invade it's territory.

Not gonna lie, i'm torn here. I'm not sure I agree with this.


Read the damn article.

They stated that that specific elephant was stalking humans, an abnormal behaviour pattern in contrast to the other packiderms co-habitating with the local tribes.

They opted to tranquilize the dam thing, but lethal force was necessary.

The tribes that invaded it's territory. Also, tranquilizing isn't the only, end all option to subdue an animal and transport it elsewhere. I did read the article, in it's entirety, and stand by my statement. Just because it didn't run with the pack and allow humans to live among them doesn't make it a vicious animal.


Tell that to the 15 victims lying in their graves.

If I jump into a pen of tigers, I expect to be eaten. If I have unprotected sex with a prostitute, I expect to get an STD. If I invade one of the largest species of animal's territory and settle down, I accept the risk associated with doing so. It's logic over everything else. It's hazard associated with the lifestyle.
---
Ten million dollars on a losing campaign
Twenty million starving and writhing in pain
... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate
08/16/17 2:41:10 AM
#25:


MachoManSavage posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
Vicious_Dios posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
How about let it live it's life as a wild animal? Was that not an option?

Don't go near the thing, or relocate it hundreds of miles away from human civilization and let it live out it's life.

If a bunch of strangers just showed up on my property I might get a little aggressive also. The animal didn't choose to have humans invade it's territory.

Not gonna lie, i'm torn here. I'm not sure I agree with this.


Read the damn article.

They stated that that specific elephant was stalking humans, an abnormal behaviour pattern in contrast to the other packiderms co-habitating with the local tribes.

They opted to tranquilize the dam thing, but lethal force was necessary.

The tribes that invaded it's territory. Also, tranquilizing isn't the only, end all option to subdue an animal and transport it elsewhere. I did read the article, in it's entirety, and stand by my statement. Just because it didn't run with the pack and allow humans to live among them doesn't make it a vicious animal.


Would you kill a lone mosquito carrying AIDs in your vicinity?

Would you kill a charging grizzly running toward your loved one? (In the woods)

Comparing an insect to an intelligent animal is ridiculous. I wouldn't bring my loved one in the wilderness with grizzly bears. I would make an educated decision to camp somewhere without risk of bears or predatory animals.
---
Ten million dollars on a losing campaign
Twenty million starving and writhing in pain
... Copied to Clipboard!
MachoManSavage
08/16/17 2:44:17 AM
#26:


MabusIncarnate posted...
MachoManSavage posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
Vicious_Dios posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
How about let it live it's life as a wild animal? Was that not an option?

Don't go near the thing, or relocate it hundreds of miles away from human civilization and let it live out it's life.

If a bunch of strangers just showed up on my property I might get a little aggressive also. The animal didn't choose to have humans invade it's territory.

Not gonna lie, i'm torn here. I'm not sure I agree with this.


Read the damn article.

They stated that that specific elephant was stalking humans, an abnormal behaviour pattern in contrast to the other packiderms co-habitating with the local tribes.

They opted to tranquilize the dam thing, but lethal force was necessary.

The tribes that invaded it's territory. Also, tranquilizing isn't the only, end all option to subdue an animal and transport it elsewhere. I did read the article, in it's entirety, and stand by my statement. Just because it didn't run with the pack and allow humans to live among them doesn't make it a vicious animal.


Would you kill a lone mosquito carrying AIDs in your vicinity?

Would you kill a charging grizzly running toward your loved one? (In the woods)

Comparing an insect to an intelligent animal is ridiculous. I wouldn't bring my loved one in the wilderness with grizzly bears. I would make an educated decision to camp somewhere without risk of bears or predatory animals.


But you may accidently bring a loved one near the vicinity of a grizzly. In that scenario, would you kill the bear? Or accept that you intruded into the bears world and back away? And let the bear do it's bidding (after all it's just protecting it's young)

(You are carrying a shotgun at this point)
---
A proud wrestling Smark, because we know better than you.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Vicious_Dios
08/16/17 2:44:39 AM
#27:


“This entire belt is inhabited by native tribal communities who have co-existed with wildlife for centuries, the elephant’s behavior — that he was literally stalking humans — is still a mystery,” Khan told reporters.

Gg.
---
S / K / Y / N / E
Twitch/YouTube/GT: Adzeta
... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate
08/16/17 2:48:12 AM
#28:


MachoManSavage posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
MachoManSavage posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
Vicious_Dios posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
How about let it live it's life as a wild animal? Was that not an option?

Don't go near the thing, or relocate it hundreds of miles away from human civilization and let it live out it's life.

If a bunch of strangers just showed up on my property I might get a little aggressive also. The animal didn't choose to have humans invade it's territory.

Not gonna lie, i'm torn here. I'm not sure I agree with this.


Read the damn article.

They stated that that specific elephant was stalking humans, an abnormal behaviour pattern in contrast to the other packiderms co-habitating with the local tribes.

They opted to tranquilize the dam thing, but lethal force was necessary.

The tribes that invaded it's territory. Also, tranquilizing isn't the only, end all option to subdue an animal and transport it elsewhere. I did read the article, in it's entirety, and stand by my statement. Just because it didn't run with the pack and allow humans to live among them doesn't make it a vicious animal.


Would you kill a lone mosquito carrying AIDs in your vicinity?

Would you kill a charging grizzly running toward your loved one? (In the woods)

Comparing an insect to an intelligent animal is ridiculous. I wouldn't bring my loved one in the wilderness with grizzly bears. I would make an educated decision to camp somewhere without risk of bears or predatory animals.


But you may accidently bring a loved one near the vicinity of a grizzly. In that scenario, would you kill the bear? Or accept that you intruded into the bears world and back away? And let the bear do it's bidding (after all it's just protecting it's young)

(You are carrying a shotgun at this point)

I clearly stated that I would make an educated decision to not be in the region of bears. There is a pretty clear range of most species, and a lot of the US that has zero risk of bears or predatory animals. Thankfully, the internet exists so I may research prior to choosing a spot for me and my family to vacation. As a result, this scenario does not occur.
---
Ten million dollars on a losing campaign
Twenty million starving and writhing in pain
... Copied to Clipboard!
MachoManSavage
08/16/17 2:55:45 AM
#29:


MabusIncarnate posted...
MachoManSavage posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
MachoManSavage posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
Vicious_Dios posted...
MabusIncarnate posted...
How about let it live it's life as a wild animal? Was that not an option?

Don't go near the thing, or relocate it hundreds of miles away from human civilization and let it live out it's life.

If a bunch of strangers just showed up on my property I might get a little aggressive also. The animal didn't choose to have humans invade it's territory.

Not gonna lie, i'm torn here. I'm not sure I agree with this.


Read the damn article.

They stated that that specific elephant was stalking humans, an abnormal behaviour pattern in contrast to the other packiderms co-habitating with the local tribes.

They opted to tranquilize the dam thing, but lethal force was necessary.

The tribes that invaded it's territory. Also, tranquilizing isn't the only, end all option to subdue an animal and transport it elsewhere. I did read the article, in it's entirety, and stand by my statement. Just because it didn't run with the pack and allow humans to live among them doesn't make it a vicious animal.


Would you kill a lone mosquito carrying AIDs in your vicinity?

Would you kill a charging grizzly running toward your loved one? (In the woods)

Comparing an insect to an intelligent animal is ridiculous. I wouldn't bring my loved one in the wilderness with grizzly bears. I would make an educated decision to camp somewhere without risk of bears or predatory animals.


But you may accidently bring a loved one near the vicinity of a grizzly. In that scenario, would you kill the bear? Or accept that you intruded into the bears world and back away? And let the bear do it's bidding (after all it's just protecting it's young)

(You are carrying a shotgun at this point)

I clearly stated that I would make an educated decision to not be in the region of bears. There is a pretty clear range of most species, and a lot of the US that has zero risk of bears or predatory animals. Thankfully, the internet exists so I may research prior to choosing a spot for me and my family to vacation. As a result, this scenario does not occur.


Okay I rest my case.
---
A proud wrestling Smark, because we know better than you.
... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE
08/16/17 3:03:47 AM
#30:


they just needed Balrog to deliver one clean punch.
---
Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to your story!
BAWSE!
... Copied to Clipboard!
EnragedSlith
08/16/17 3:05:28 AM
#31:


MabusIncarnate posted...
How about let it live it's life as a wild animal? Was that not an option?

Don't go near the thing, or relocate it hundreds of miles away from human civilization and let it live out it's life.

If a bunch of strangers just showed up on my property I might get a little aggressive also. The animal didn't choose to have humans invade it's territory.

Not gonna lie, i'm torn here. I'm not sure I agree with this.

Wat

It killed 15 people, you goober
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
unpleasant_milk
08/16/17 3:17:31 AM
#32:


The elephant was just pissed of with seeing too many humans, and with also seeing them encroach into their natural habitats.
I'd have done the same, but better.
---
GT unpleasant milk
#I want a poacher skin rug ~ http://imgur.com/a/V10yv
... Copied to Clipboard!
Ammonitida
08/16/17 9:02:24 AM
#33:


This is really interesting behavior for a non-human species. This is proof that like dolphins, elephants are extremely intelligent and perhaps even telepathic.
... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy
08/16/17 4:57:02 PM
#34:


MabusIncarnate posted...
How about let it live it's life as a wild animal? Was that not an option?

Don't go near the thing, or relocate it hundreds of miles away from human civilization and let it live out it's life.

If a bunch of strangers just showed up on my property I might get a little aggressive also. The animal didn't choose to have humans invade it's territory.

Not gonna lie, i'm torn here. I'm not sure I agree with this.


*its, not it's

Elephants have been known to serial kill humans, so this suggestion would not have likely stopped it. Tragically, in many cases, serial killer elephants often start as a result of trauma caused by humans (I heard of one that would stalk and kill humans whenever it could after having witnessed people killing its child). Still, even if humans are to blame, you can't really expect people to be all "welp, it's our fault the elephant is killing us, so might as well just let it do its thing"
---
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy
08/16/17 4:59:24 PM
#35:


Ammonitida posted...
This is really interesting behavior for a non-human species. This is proof that like dolphins, elephants are extremely intelligent and perhaps even telepathic.


Not telepathic, but otherwise yes you are right. They are highly intelligent, have excellent memory and intuition and have a hypersensory ability involving feeling vibrations in the ground so they know what's around them for miles... or something to that effect.
---
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
... Copied to Clipboard!
mustachedmystic
08/16/17 5:19:11 PM
#36:


Maybe this is the beginning of real life Zoo(The dumbass CBS show, based on the James Patterson Book).
---
Guns; freedom you can hold in your hand.
Sampson, Terrordactyl
... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy
08/17/17 11:36:06 AM
#37:


mustachedmystic posted...
Maybe this is the beginning of real life Zoo(The dumbass CBS show, based on the James Patterson Book).


As dumb as the show is, I would approve of this
---
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
... Copied to Clipboard!
Sad_Face
08/17/17 11:42:00 AM
#38:


MabusIncarnate posted...
If I jump into a pen of tigers, I expect to be eaten. If I have unprotected sex with a prostitute, I expect to get an STD. If I invade one of the largest species of animal's territory and settle down, I accept the risk associated with doing so. It's logic over everything else. It's hazard associated with the lifestyle.


Survival of the fittest bro. If you jump into a pen of tigers with a fully loaded machine gun, no one is going to question your survival. If you ensure the prostitute has up to date medical records and is clean and is giving you a single month of exclusive service, you don't need to expect an STD. If you invade some territory, drive out the indigenous species, and settle down, it's your home now, not theirs.
---
imgtc.com/i/4HgTl0ebzq.jpg imgtc.com/i/60CWP2Gtlg.gif
... Copied to Clipboard!
#40
Post #40 was unavailable or deleted.
Topic List
Page List: 1