Current Events > Modded for saying China destroyed the environment - in a topic about CEmen

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
DonaldClinton 09/04/17 5:36:44 PM #51:	Typical snowflakes <cite>DonaldClinton posted [p:886019648] in Modded for... [t:75740517]...</cite> <quote>Typical snowflakes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Delta_F14 09/04/17 5:43:05 PM #52:	You can't complain about being modded on this shit site, mods can mod you for any reason they want. --- "You see that you and I are of a different stripe, don't you? We don't have to dream that we're important. We are." Robert House <cite>Delta_F14 posted [p:886019994] in Modded for... [t:75740517]...</cite> <quote>You can't complain about being modded on this shit site, mods can mod you for any reason they want.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KLouD_KoNNeCteD 09/04/17 5:46:38 PM #53:	penis topic --- Quintons fatass way back there. Homie cant keep his pants up. Tryna borrow a belt I'm like Nobody here wear size EQUATOR!! <cite>KLouD_KoNNeCteD posted [p:886020199] in Modded for... [t:75740517]...</cite> <quote>penis topic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 09/04/17 5:52:06 PM #54:	Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:886020511] in Modded for... [t:75740517]...</cite> <quote>Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
3rd_Best_Master 09/04/17 6:03:15 PM #55:	Nomadic View posted... Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument. Did the environment consent to China fucking it? Cause if it didn't then it's an apt descriptor of China's actions. --- You've fought the strongest, the second strongest, the fourth strongest, and the weakest master! Now you see the true advantage of being third strongest master! <cite>3rd_Best_Master posted [p:886021172] in Modded for... [t:75740517]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument.</quote> Did the environment consent to China fucking it? Cause if it didn't then it's an apt descriptor of China's actions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 09/04/17 6:04:32 PM #56:	Nomadic View posted... Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument. That word gets used in that way all the time --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:886021244] in Modded for... [t:75740517]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument.</quote> That word gets used in that way all the time</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 09/04/17 6:04:51 PM #57:	3rd_Best_Master posted... Nomadic View posted... Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument. Did the environment consent to China fucking it? Cause if it didn't then it's an apt descriptor of China's actions. Considering that neither one is sentient nor has genitals, no it isn't. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:886021262] in Modded for... [t:75740517]...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument.</quote> Did the environment consent to China fucking it? Cause if it didn't then it's an apt descriptor of China's actions.</quote> Considering that neither one is sentient nor has genitals, no it isn't.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
3rd_Best_Master 09/04/17 6:09:43 PM #58:	Nomadic View posted... 3rd_Best_Master posted... Nomadic View posted... Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument. Did the environment consent to China fucking it? Cause if it didn't then it's an apt descriptor of China's actions. Considering that neither one is sentient nor has genitals, no it isn't. And yet there's very few words that carry as succinct a connotation that describe China's treatment of the environment. --- You've fought the strongest, the second strongest, the fourth strongest, and the weakest master! Now you see the true advantage of being third strongest master! <cite>3rd_Best_Master posted [p:886021531] in Modded for... [t:75740517]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument.</quote> Did the environment consent to China fucking it? Cause if it didn't then it's an apt descriptor of China's actions.</quote> Considering that neither one is sentient nor has genitals, no it isn't.</quote> And yet there's very few words that carry as succinct a connotation that describe China's treatment of the environment.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivynn 09/04/17 6:18:17 PM #59:	Kitt posted... Free my goobie Bok Choi. --- http://i.imgur.com/vDci4hD.gif <cite>Ivynn posted [p:886022037] in Modded for... [t:75740517]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kitt posted...</cite> <quote>Free my goobie Bok Choi.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KLouD_KoNNeCteD 09/04/17 6:21:21 PM #60:	3rd_Best_Master posted... Nomadic View posted... 3rd_Best_Master posted... Nomadic View posted... Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument. Did the environment consent to China fucking it? Cause if it didn't then it's an apt descriptor of China's actions. Considering that neither one is sentient nor has genitals, no it isn't. And yet there's very few words that carry as succinct a connotation that describe China's treatment of the environment. QQ --- Quintons fatass way back there. Homie cant keep his pants up. Tryna borrow a belt I'm like Nobody here wear size EQUATOR!! <cite>KLouD_KoNNeCteD posted [p:886022193] in Modded for... [t:75740517]...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument.</quote> Did the environment consent to China fucking it? Cause if it didn't then it's an apt descriptor of China's actions.</quote> Considering that neither one is sentient nor has genitals, no it isn't.</quote> And yet there's very few words that carry as succinct a connotation that describe China's treatment of the environment.</quote> QQ</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 09/04/17 6:39:53 PM #61:	3rd_Best_Master posted... Nomadic View posted... 3rd_Best_Master posted... Nomadic View posted... Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument. Did the environment consent to China fucking it? Cause if it didn't then it's an apt descriptor of China's actions. Considering that neither one is sentient nor has genitals, no it isn't. And yet there's very few words that carry as succinct a connotation that describe China's treatment of the environment. Sounds like you just need to expand your vocabulary. And in all honesty, it personally doesn't bother me at all if that is the word he used. However, GameFAQs has made it clear that "rape" isn't appropriate to be used in a context that isn't forceful sexual penetration. You can agree with the rule or not on whether it should be offensive, but the bottom line is that this site deems it offensive when used in most any other regard. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:886023130] in Modded for... [t:75740517]...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Did you use [forceful sexual intercourse] instead of "destroy"? Because that is more likely the reason for the moderation than the context of your argument.</quote> Did the environment consent to China fucking it? Cause if it didn't then it's an apt descriptor of China's actions.</quote> Considering that neither one is sentient nor has genitals, no it isn't.</quote> And yet there's very few words that carry as succinct a connotation that describe China's treatment of the environment.</quote> Sounds like you just need to expand your vocabulary. And in all honesty, it personally doesn't bother me at all if that is the word he used. However, GameFAQs has made it clear that "rape" isn't appropriate to be used in a context that isn't forceful sexual penetration. You can agree with the rule or not on whether it should be offensive, but the bottom line is that this site deems it offensive when used in most any other regard.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Life Sympathy 09/04/17 11:16:48 PM #62:	joeun_saram posted... Sorry I used such strong language lmfao have you tried expressing your opinion without being a degenerate? works 100% of the time for me. --- We're surrounding you. We see you, but you probably don't see us. And if you see us, we're not letting on that we see you. <cite>Life Sympathy posted [p:886038878] in Modded for... [t:75740517]...</cite> <quote><cite>joeun_saram posted...</cite> <quote>Sorry I used such strong language lmfao</quote> have you tried expressing your opinion without being a degenerate? works 100% of the time for me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Modded for saying China destroyed the environment - in a topic about CEmen (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Modded for saying China destroyed the environment - in a topic about CEmen