Current Events > Sadiq Khan, mayor of London, says President Trump is not welcome in Britain

(+) Yeah! (+)

Fishy posted...

What's it saying then? Because I can name you a dozen big cities that haven't seen a terrorist attack in years while big refugee centers like London and Paris have seen more in the past few years than they have in decades.

It's almost as if there is more than one variable to whether or not you are hit by a terrorist attack or not.

Are you dense?
---

Fishy posted...

What's it saying then?

It's saying that their's a risk of violent attacks in big cities, and people have to be vigilant and prepared.

luigi13579 posted...

That's a far cry from what many claim he said. You should expect to be prepared. Well, of course you should. How could anyone disagree with that? Even if you live in a city that doesn't have attacks like this, it'd be complacent to not be prepared.

It's sweet that he's so worried about us while london has had as many terrorist attacks this year as it did the entire decade before.
---

southcoast09 posted...

How was khan even elected?

Britain's not gonna be welcome in the new Pacific Trade deals. Not until they change. Nationalism won and globalism lost, which is what their union tries to force on everybody.

Londons well on it's way to been an islamic city.

"The more you speak against Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists it will create" - Malala Yousafzai, Nobel Prize winner and activist
---

Fishy posted...

It's sweet that he's so worried about us while london has had as many terrorist attacks this year as it did the entire decade before.

So you are upset he is saying he wants to combat terrorism?
---

southcoast09 posted...

How was khan even elected?

Britain's not gonna be welcome in the new Pacific Trade deals. Not until they change. Nationalism won and globalism lost, which is what their union tries to force on everybody.

So, nationalism, no globalism, and at the same time pacific trade deals? This is a contradiction. You're not a true follower of MAGA and MGAA (make gamefaqs admiral again)

Funkydog posted...

So you are upset he is saying he wants to combat terrorism?

Preparing for terrorism isn't combating it. Combating is proactive, preparing is by definition reactive. If you want to combat it try not importing refugee by the truck of peace-load.
---

Fishy posted...

Funkydog posted...

So you are upset he is saying he wants to combat terrorism?

Preparing for terrorism isn't combating it. Combating is proactive, preparing is by definition reactive. If you want to combat it try not importing refugee by the truck of peace-load.

Seems awfully pedantic on word choice just because he isn't screaming bloody murder
---

Fishy posted...

Funkydog posted...

So you are upset he is saying he wants to combat terrorism?

Preparing for terrorism isn't combating it. Combating is proactive, preparing is by definition reactive. If you want to combat it try not importing refugee by the truck of peace-load.

Pretty much, and I'm not sure what the left is missing here.

For their comprehension, imagine a university president saying "Part and parcel of attending a great college is youve got to be prepared for women to be raped. Youve got to be vigilant, youve got to support the police doing an incredibly hard job."

You know what would happen next? Liberals would be outraged, say this was sexist victim blaming, and demand classes teaching "men not to rape." Not exactly the same reaction they're having here.
---

The Admiral posted...

You know what would happen next? Liberals would be outraged, say this was sexist victim blaming, and demand classes teaching "men not to rape." Not exactly the same reaction they're having here.

Then those liberals would be pretty stupid.

He still didn't say what you claim he did though. Accepting are shitty people in the world and preparing for that is different to "deal with it"

In fact it is essentially what many conservatives say but without inflammatory language
---

The Admiral posted...

Vyrulisse posted...

Well the real question is... were the videos fake or was that actually what was happening? If the videos are true then I'm not sure why people act so offended that it got more attention.

The videos were real. They simply highlight a problem that is politically incorrect to discuss.

Obviously the videos are real, but 2 out of 3 of them weren't Muslims. One was a dutch boy attacking a white and the other was a a riot/coup in Egypt way back in 2013. The only one that looks legit was probably the 2 guys who destroyed the statue of mother Mary (which most Protestants would probably for anyways and the only ones who would be offended by it are probably Catholics). Trump literally tweeted fake news.
---

Funkydog posted...

He still didn't say what you claim he did though. Accepting are shitty people in the world and preparing for that is different to "deal with it"

In fact it is essentially what many conservatives say but without inflammatory language

Yeah you're right, my bad.
---

*enters topic*
*reads first couple of posts*
*leaves topic*
---

Bio1590 posted...

*enters topic*
*reads first couple of posts*
*leaves topic*

Did you see mine?
---

The Admiral posted...

You know what would happen next? Liberals would be outraged, say this was sexist victim blaming, and demand classes teaching "men not to rape." Not exactly the same reaction they're having here.

Cool. Now imagine colleges doing what you're doing and basically saying "Men need not attend because a small minority of them are rapists and a not-insignificant amount of them don't even know what rape is."

You would be like "lol those liberal policies".

It's stupid in both situations.
---

KazumaKiryu posted...

All they do is share the videos. That's not a hate group.

They called an Afghan police officer who was assassinated by the Taliban a terrorist just because she was wearing a burqa: http://i.huffpost.com/gen/2084300/thumbs/o-BRITAIN-FIRST-570.jpg

They also said they don't recognize the validity of the word "racist".
---

If you did 5 seconds worth of research on BF you would realize they are a literal hate group.
---

mario2000 posted...

If you did 5 seconds worth of research on BF you would realize they are a literal hate group.

You think Republicans are a literal hate group.

Newhopes posted...

southcoast09 posted...

How was khan even elected?

Britain's not gonna be welcome in the new Pacific Trade deals. Not until they change. Nationalism won and globalism lost, which is what their union tries to force on everybody.

Londons well on it's way to been an islamic city.

*London's

*its

*being

*(technically Islamic, but I don't like capitalizing religion names/descriptors either, so I would have typed it the way you did. I just wanted to acknowledge that technically it is a proper noun, in the event anyone else would have corrected me for not having corrected you)
---

Britanistan.

GunmaN1905 posted...

Britanistan.

What?

AdviceMan posted...

The Admiral posted...

You know what would happen next? Liberals would be outraged, say this was sexist victim blaming, and demand classes teaching "men not to rape." Not exactly the same reaction they're having here.

Cool. Now imagine colleges doing what you're doing and basically saying "Men need not attend because a small minority of them are rapists and a not-insignificant amount of them don't even know what rape is."

You would be like "lol those liberal policies".

It's stupid in both situations.

Having seminars where "men are taught not to rape" is already half a step there.
---

The Admiral posted...

For their comprehension, imagine a university president saying "Part and parcel of attending a great college is youve got to be prepared for women to be raped. Youve got to be vigilant, youve got to support the police doing an incredibly hard job."

It probably would be good for a college to acknowledge that sexual assault is an issue they should be vigilant with. Not something to bury to avoid a controversy so their campus sounds safe.

A city is different than a college though.
---

JE19426 posted...

GunmaN1905 posted...

Britanistan.

What?

It's a common joke in European online gaming communities.

People insult countries overflowing with immigrants with terms like that.
Swedistan is another common example.

CrimsonRage posted...

Funbazooka posted...

"The more you speak against Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists it will create" - Malala Yousafzai, Nobel Prize winner and activist

How is that different from "the more you push SJW identity politics, the more extremists and white nationalists it will create" that I often see here?

If you think they're the same thing, are you saying they're both true or they're both false?
---

CrimsonRage posted...

Funbazooka posted...

"The more you speak against Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists it will create" - Malala Yousafzai, Nobel Prize winner and activist

How is that different from "the more you push SJW identity politics, the more extremists and white nationalists it will create" that I often see here?

The takeaway is that Malala Yousafzai is stating that Muslims will react in a certain way towards criticism of their religion. With that comment she was trying to blame non-Muslims for terrorism but may have inadvertently admitted to something inherent to the nature of Islamism.
---

Funbazooka posted...

CrimsonRage posted...

Funbazooka posted...

"The more you speak against Islam and against all Muslims, the more terrorists it will create" - Malala Yousafzai, Nobel Prize winner and activist

How is that different from "the more you push SJW identity politics, the more extremists and white nationalists it will create" that I often see here?

The takeaway is that Malala Yousafzai is stating that Muslims will react in a certain way towards criticism of their religion. With that comment she was trying to blame non-Muslims for terrorism but may have inadvertently admitted to something inherent to the nature of Islamism.

Holdon, so it is everyone else's fault (people that are not muslim) that muslims suicide bomb, murder, rape, and massacre other people?

Is that seriously the message a nobel prize winner has? If I understood that correctly, lol. Wowwwwwwwww
---

CrimsonRage posted...

How is that different from "the more you push SJW identity politics, the more extremists and white nationalists it will create" that I often see here?

Because everyone knows white nationalists are insane. No one wants to admit Islam is though.
---

Remember in 2015 when Ben Carson said that refugees shouldn't be admitted to the US because Americans' hostility would radicalize them.

Lmfao.
---

Fishy posted...

No one wants to admit Islam is though.

I just want to remind you that blaming all of Islam for radicalized, Wahabi-driven Muslims is like blaming the Pope for the existence of the Westboro Baptist Church and the KKK (a christian organization)

Just imagine an American-based Christian organization
Planning to poison water supplies
To bring the second coming quicker
---

einegutePerson posted...

I just want to remind you that blaming all of Islam for radicalized, Wahabi-driven Muslims is like blaming the Pope for the existence of the Westboro Baptist Church and the KKK (a christian organization)

Just imagine an American-based Christian organization
Planning to poison water supplies
To bring the second coming quicker

That's super cool but the basic tenets of Islam itself are crazy. On that note so is Catholicism and Christianity. Remember don't eat oysters or allow women to preach, and foreskins are the devil!
---

Fishy posted...

but the basic tenets of Islam itself are crazy. On that note so is Catholicism and Christianity

---

Sorry my dude you're right I'll go grab my rosary and say twenty Hail Marys, I mean how else would God forgive me.
---

So they all crazy but only Islam needs to be acknowledged as insane
because their tenets are insane
just like the Judeo-Christian religions before it
but those are better apparently
because you're not as outraged
lmfao
---

I'm pretty sure I explicitly said they're all crazy. Are you okay. At least in the current year Catholics aren't carbombing the Vatican.
---

Fishy posted...

At least in the current year Catholics aren't carbombing the Vatican.

No, they're just bombing Syria and other parts of the Middle East


---

pakistani
---

Oh boy you're one of those.
---

Fishy posted...

Because everyone knows Muslims are insane. No one wants to admit the Judeo-Christian dominated west is though.

---

Can you elaborate or are you just going to keep saying "b-b-but Christians!"
---

No, actually I've been pretty clear about what I've been trying to say
If you haven't "gotten" it that's not my problem tbh

einegutePerson posted...

Just imagine an American-based Christian organization
Planning to poison water supplies
To bring the second coming quicker

---

Just imagine if a basic teaching of Catholicism was "if they're not part of your religion make them part of it or kill them"

I wonder what crazy religion is like that
---

Christianity has literally done that in the past.....
---

spikethedevil posted...

Christianity has literally done that in the past.....

WOW IT'S LIKE I KEEP SAYING THAT TOO
---

Fishy posted...

Just imagine if a basic teaching of Catholicism was "if they're not part of your religion make them part of it or kill them"

I wonder what crazy religion is like that

It wasn't even part of their religion yet that's exactly what they did to indigenous people around the globe anyways.
---

Fishy posted...

WOW IT'S LIKE I KEEP SAYING THAT TOO

I'm more poking fun at your limited, simple beliefs about religions
---