Current Events > Michael Flynn charged with making false statement to FBI

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
P4wn4g3 12/01/17 2:18:21 PM #152:	What's going on guys, I have to work --- Hive Mind of Dark Aether, the unofficial Metroid Social Private board. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/851-dark-aether <cite>P4wn4g3 posted [p:891403715] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote>What's going on guys, I have to work</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shadow Don 12/01/17 2:19:12 PM #153:	The Admiral posted... Giant_Aspirin posted... Alucard188 posted... Damn, man. This is pretty huge. How often does a currently-standing President's own people get charged for something like this? objectively speaking, under Republican leadership an overwhelming majority of the time. here's a breakdown of indictments vs charges vs convictions for the last nine presidents: I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didnt take long and there is no comparison. When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, its so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly corrupt the Democrats are. So why dont we break it down by president and the numbers? Obama (D) 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as scandal free they arent speaking wishfully, theyre simply telling the truth. Flynn was an Obama appointee. LMFAO --- sigless user <cite>Shadow Don posted [p:891403762] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant_Aspirin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Alucard188 posted...</cite> <quote>Damn, man. This is pretty huge. How often does a currently-standing President's own people get charged for something like this?</quote> objectively speaking, under Republican leadership an overwhelming majority of the time. here's a breakdown of indictments vs charges vs convictions for the last nine presidents: I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didnt take long and there is no comparison. When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, its so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly corrupt the Democrats are. So why dont we break it down by president and the numbers? Obama (D) 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as scandal free they arent speaking wishfully, theyre simply telling the truth.</quote> Flynn was an Obama appointee.</quote> LMFAO</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrisbeeDude 12/01/17 2:21:00 PM #154:	Shadow Don posted... The Admiral posted... Giant_Aspirin posted... Alucard188 posted... Damn, man. This is pretty huge. How often does a currently-standing President's own people get charged for something like this? objectively speaking, under Republican leadership an overwhelming majority of the time. here's a breakdown of indictments vs charges vs convictions for the last nine presidents: I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didnt take long and there is no comparison. When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, its so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly corrupt the Democrats are. So why dont we break it down by president and the numbers? Obama (D) 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as scandal free they arent speaking wishfully, theyre simply telling the truth. Flynn was an Obama appointee. LMFAO --- No one gets in the way of my frisbee games! NO ONE! <cite>FrisbeeDude posted [p:891403862] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Shadow Don posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant_Aspirin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Alucard188 posted...</cite> <quote>Damn, man. This is pretty huge. How often does a currently-standing President's own people get charged for something like this?</quote> objectively speaking, under Republican leadership an overwhelming majority of the time. here's a breakdown of indictments vs charges vs convictions for the last nine presidents: I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didnt take long and there is no comparison. When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, its so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly corrupt the Democrats are. So why dont we break it down by president and the numbers? Obama (D) 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as scandal free they arent speaking wishfully, theyre simply telling the truth.</quote> Flynn was an Obama appointee.</quote> LMFAO</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 12/01/17 2:22:03 PM #155:	The Admiral posted... Giant_Aspirin posted... Alucard188 posted... Damn, man. This is pretty huge. How often does a currently-standing President's own people get charged for something like this? objectively speaking, under Republican leadership an overwhelming majority of the time. here's a breakdown of indictments vs charges vs convictions for the last nine presidents: I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didnt take long and there is no comparison. When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, its so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly corrupt the Democrats are. So why dont we break it down by president and the numbers? Obama (D) 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as scandal free they arent speaking wishfully, theyre simply telling the truth. Flynn was an Obama appointee. You aren't even trying anymore. This is sad dude, have some self respect. --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:891403935] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant_Aspirin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Alucard188 posted...</cite> <quote>Damn, man. This is pretty huge. How often does a currently-standing President's own people get charged for something like this?</quote> objectively speaking, under Republican leadership an overwhelming majority of the time. here's a breakdown of indictments vs charges vs convictions for the last nine presidents: I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didnt take long and there is no comparison. When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, its so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly corrupt the Democrats are. So why dont we break it down by president and the numbers? Obama (D) 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as scandal free they arent speaking wishfully, theyre simply telling the truth.</quote> Flynn was an Obama appointee.</quote> You aren't even trying anymore. This is sad dude, have some self respect.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
P4wn4g3 12/01/17 2:26:35 PM #156:	P4wn4g3 posted... What's going on guys, I have to work This wasn't a jab at admiral, I was genuinely curious what Comey's testimony is, but also it's a jab at Admiral now. --- Hive Mind of Dark Aether, the unofficial Metroid Social Private board. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/851-dark-aether <cite>P4wn4g3 posted [p:891404167] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>P4wn4g3 posted...</cite> <quote>What's going on guys, I have to work</quote> This wasn't a jab at admiral, I was genuinely curious what Comey's testimony is, but also it's a jab at Admiral now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
That_Happened 12/01/17 2:26:41 PM #157:	The Admiral posted... I'm comfortable making the claim that the majority of the people at the bar -- which was 10:30 in the morning on a weekday -- are not meaningfully employed, if at all. Isn't it way more likely that they're college or graduate students, being that most of them look relatively young? --- http://fusionanomaly.net/magnoliabutitdidhappen.jpg <cite>That_Happened posted [p:891404173] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>I'm comfortable making the claim that the majority of the people at the bar -- which was 10:30 in the morning on a weekday -- are not meaningfully employed, if at all.</quote> Isn't it way more likely that they're college or graduate students, being that most of them look relatively young?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kim Kusanagi 12/01/17 2:28:38 PM #158:	The Admiral posted... Giant_Aspirin posted... Alucard188 posted... Damn, man. This is pretty huge. How often does a currently-standing President's own people get charged for something like this? objectively speaking, under Republican leadership an overwhelming majority of the time. here's a breakdown of indictments vs charges vs convictions for the last nine presidents: I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didnt take long and there is no comparison. When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, its so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly corrupt the Democrats are. So why dont we break it down by president and the numbers? Obama (D) 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as scandal free they arent speaking wishfully, theyre simply telling the truth. Flynn was an Obama appointee. NATO didn't existe before 911 --- Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting. Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time! <cite>Kim Kusanagi posted [p:891404291] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant_Aspirin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Alucard188 posted...</cite> <quote>Damn, man. This is pretty huge. How often does a currently-standing President's own people get charged for something like this?</quote> objectively speaking, under Republican leadership an overwhelming majority of the time. here's a breakdown of indictments vs charges vs convictions for the last nine presidents: I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didnt take long and there is no comparison. When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, its so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly corrupt the Democrats are. So why dont we break it down by president and the numbers? Obama (D) 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as scandal free they arent speaking wishfully, theyre simply telling the truth.</quote> Flynn was an Obama appointee.</quote> NATO didn't existe before 911</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 12/01/17 2:30:08 PM #159:	Kim Kusanagi posted... The Admiral posted... Giant_Aspirin posted... Alucard188 posted... Damn, man. This is pretty huge. How often does a currently-standing President's own people get charged for something like this? objectively speaking, under Republican leadership an overwhelming majority of the time. here's a breakdown of indictments vs charges vs convictions for the last nine presidents: I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didnt take long and there is no comparison. When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, its so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly corrupt the Democrats are. So why dont we break it down by president and the numbers? Obama (D) 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as scandal free they arent speaking wishfully, theyre simply telling the truth. Flynn was an Obama appointee. NATO didn't existe before 911 1) that wasn't The Admirl 2) how are you one of the worst posters on this board? Like top 5 without a doubt. --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:891404371] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant_Aspirin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Alucard188 posted...</cite> <quote>Damn, man. This is pretty huge. How often does a currently-standing President's own people get charged for something like this?</quote> objectively speaking, under Republican leadership an overwhelming majority of the time. here's a breakdown of indictments vs charges vs convictions for the last nine presidents: I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didnt take long and there is no comparison. When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, its so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly corrupt the Democrats are. So why dont we break it down by president and the numbers? Obama (D) 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as scandal free they arent speaking wishfully, theyre simply telling the truth.</quote> Flynn was an Obama appointee.</quote> NATO didn't existe before 911</quote> 1) that wasn't The Admirl 2) how are you one of the worst posters on this board? Like top 5 without a doubt.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 12/01/17 2:32:52 PM #160:	Kim is absolutely obsessed with Mal Fet. It's very weird. I had the same experience with that pegasus user on here a while ago. Some people on the Internet have nothing else in the life going on other than stalking superior humans online. It's best to ignore him --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:891404505] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote>Kim is absolutely obsessed with Mal Fet. It's very weird. I had the same experience with that pegasus user on here a while ago. Some people on the Internet have nothing else in the life going on other than stalking superior humans online. It's best to ignore him</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 12/01/17 2:33:18 PM #161:	Giant_Aspirin posted... Alucard188 posted... Damn, man. This is pretty huge. How often does a currently-standing President's own people get charged for something like this? objectively speaking, under Republican leadership an overwhelming majority of the time. here's a breakdown of indictments vs charges vs convictions for the last nine presidents: ?I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didn?t take long and there is no comparison. When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, it?s so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly ?corrupt? the Democrats are. So why don?t we break it down by president and the numbers? Obama (D) ? 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as ?scandal free? they aren?t speaking wishfully, they?re simply telling the truth. Bush, George W. (R) ? 8 yrs in office. 16 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 9 prison sentences. Clinton (D) ? 8 yrs in office. 2 criminal indictments. One conviction. One prison sentence. That?s right nearly 8 yrs of investigations. Tens of millions spent and 30 yrs of claiming them the most corrupt ever and there was exactly one person convicted of a crime. Bush, George H. W. (R) ? 4 yrs in office. One indictment. One conviction. One prison sentence. Reagan (R) ? 8 yrs in office. 26 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 8 prison sentences. Carter (D) ? 4 yrs in office. One indictment. Zero convictions and zero prison sentences. Ford (R) ? 4 yrs in office. One indictment and one conviction. One prison sentence. Nixon (R) ? 6 yrs in office. 76 criminal indictments. 55 convictions. 15 prison sentences. Johnson (D) ? 5 yrs in office. Zero indictments. Zero convictions. Zero prison sentences. So, let?s see where that leaves us. In the last 53 years, Democrats have been in the Oval Office for 25 of those years, while Republicans held it for 28. In their 25 yrs in office Democrats had a total of three executive branch officials indicted with one conviction and one prison sentence. That?s one whole executive branch official convicted of a crime in two and a half decades of Democrat leadership. In the 28 yrs that Republicans have held office over the last 53 yrs they have had a total of (a drum roll would be more than appropriate), 120 criminal indictments of executive branch officials. 89 criminal convictions and 34 prison sentences handed down. That?s more prison sentences than years in office since 1968 for Republicans. If you want to count articles of impeachment as indictments (they aren?t really but we can count them as an action), both sides get one more. However, Clinton wasn?t found guilty while Nixon resigned and was pardoned by Ford (and a pardon carries with it a legal admission of guilt on the part of the pardoned). So those only serve to make Republicans look even worse. With everything going on with Trump and his people right now, it?s a safe bet Republicans are gonna be padding their numbers a bit real soon. So let?s just go over the numbers one more time, shall we? 120 indictments for Republicans. 89 convictions, and 34 prison sentences. Those aren?t ?feelings? or ?alternate facts.? Those are simply the stats by the numbers. Republicans are, and have been for my entire lifetime, the most criminally corrupt party to hold the office of the presidency. So those are the actual numbers. Feel free to copy and paste!? Yeah but there would have been 200+ each indictments, convictions and sentences if hillary had won because of those emails... --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:891404530] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant_Aspirin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Alucard188 posted...</cite> <quote>Damn, man. This is pretty huge. How often does a currently-standing President's own people get charged for something like this?</quote> objectively speaking, under Republican leadership an overwhelming majority of the time. here's a breakdown of indictments vs charges vs convictions for the last nine presidents: ?I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didn?t take long and there is no comparison. When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, it?s so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly ?corrupt? the Democrats are. So why don?t we break it down by president and the numbers? Obama (D) ? 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as ?scandal free? they aren?t speaking wishfully, they?re simply telling the truth. Bush, George W. (R) ? 8 yrs in office. 16 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 9 prison sentences. Clinton (D) ? 8 yrs in office. 2 criminal indictments. One conviction. One prison sentence. That?s right nearly 8 yrs of investigations. Tens of millions spent and 30 yrs of claiming them the most corrupt ever and there was exactly one person convicted of a crime. Bush, George H. W. (R) ? 4 yrs in office. One indictment. One conviction. One prison sentence. Reagan (R) ? 8 yrs in office. 26 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 8 prison sentences. Carter (D) ? 4 yrs in office. One indictment. Zero convictions and zero prison sentences. Ford (R) ? 4 yrs in office. One indictment and one conviction. One prison sentence. Nixon (R) ? 6 yrs in office. 76 criminal indictments. 55 convictions. 15 prison sentences. Johnson (D) ? 5 yrs in office. Zero indictments. Zero convictions. Zero prison sentences. So, let?s see where that leaves us. In the last 53 years, Democrats have been in the Oval Office for 25 of those years, while Republicans held it for 28. In their 25 yrs in office Democrats had a total of three executive branch officials indicted with one conviction and one prison sentence. That?s one whole executive branch official convicted of a crime in two and a half decades of Democrat leadership. In the 28 yrs that Republicans have held office over the last 53 yrs they have had a total of (a drum roll would be more than appropriate), 120 criminal indictments of executive branch officials. 89 criminal convictions and 34 prison sentences handed down. That?s more prison sentences than years in office since 1968 for Republicans. If you want to count articles of impeachment as indictments (they aren?t really but we can count them as an action), both sides get one more. However, Clinton wasn?t found guilty while Nixon resigned and was pardoned by Ford (and a pardon carries with it a legal admission of guilt on the part of the pardoned). So those only serve to make Republicans look even worse. With everything going on with Trump and his people right now, it?s a safe bet Republicans are gonna be padding their numbers a bit real soon. So let?s just go over the numbers one more time, shall we? 120 indictments for Republicans. 89 convictions, and 34 prison sentences. Those aren?t ?feelings? or ?alternate facts.? Those are simply the stats by the numbers. Republicans are, and have been for my entire lifetime, the most criminally corrupt party to hold the office of the presidency. So those are the actual numbers. Feel free to copy and paste!?</quote> Yeah but there would have been 200+ each indictments, convictions and sentences if hillary had won because of those emails...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SmidgeIsntBack 12/01/17 2:36:16 PM #162:	UnfairRepresent posted... Kim is absolutely obsessed with Mal Fet. It's very weird. I had the same experience with that pegasus user on here a while ago. Some people on the Internet have nothing else in the life going on other than stalking superior humans online. It's best to ignore him Shout out to @pegusus123456 being the only guy to get under this gimmick user's skin. --- Audio Theater: For discussion of podcasts, radio, audiobooks, and the like https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1364- <cite>SmidgeIsntBack posted [p:891404686] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>Kim is absolutely obsessed with Mal Fet. It's very weird. I had the same experience with that pegasus user on here a while ago. Some people on the Internet have nothing else in the life going on other than stalking superior humans online. It's best to ignore him</quote> Shout out to @pegusus123456 being the only guy to get under this gimmick user's skin.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 12/01/17 2:39:13 PM #163:	UnfairRepresent posted... Kim is absolutely obsessed with Mal Fet. It's very weird. I had the same experience with that pegasus user on here a while ago. Some people on the Internet have nothing else in the life going on other than stalking superior humans online. It's best to ignore him Ohhh pegaus1245 or whatever. I actually remember that now that you mention it lol. --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:891404840] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>Kim is absolutely obsessed with Mal Fet. It's very weird. I had the same experience with that pegasus user on here a while ago. Some people on the Internet have nothing else in the life going on other than stalking superior humans online. It's best to ignore him</quote> Ohhh pegaus1245 or whatever. I actually remember that now that you mention it lol.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 12/01/17 2:40:55 PM #164:	Zeeak4444 posted... The Admiral posted... Bullet_Wing posted... Are you really going with the narrative that all those people (and everyone who wants Trump gone) are unemployed? I'm comfortable making the claim that the majority of the people at the bar -- which was 10:30 in the morning on a weekday -- are not meaningfully employed, if at all. Its almost like anyone who doesn't work 9-5MF is unemployed to Admril. No wonder he makes so many stupid statements, he's living in his own delusional and self-serving world. He called me unemployed and I work not exactly 9-5 but pretty close. What I do isn't time consuming enough to keep me off gamefaqs the entire day and the boss isn't here much and doesn't really care if anyone slacks off as long as we all get done what we are expected to get done (it's a small family business) --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:891404926] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bullet_Wing posted...</cite> <quote>Are you really going with the narrative that all those people (and everyone who wants Trump gone) are unemployed?</quote> I'm comfortable making the claim that the majority of the people at the bar -- which was 10:30 in the morning on a weekday -- are not meaningfully employed, if at all.</quote> Its almost like anyone who doesn't work 9-5MF is unemployed to Admril. No wonder he makes so many stupid statements, he's living in his own delusional and self-serving world.</quote> He called me unemployed and I work not exactly 9-5 but pretty close. What I do isn't time consuming enough to keep me off gamefaqs the entire day and the boss isn't here much and doesn't really care if anyone slacks off as long as we all get done what we are expected to get done (it's a small family business)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
glitteringfairy 12/01/17 2:44:46 PM #165:	This time guys! --- "How come you can believe in God but not Bigfoot?" V-E-G-Y http://i.imgur.com/AqR3aeX.jpg http://i.imgur.com/vvuUXpp.jpg <cite>glitteringfairy posted [p:891405115] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote>This time guys!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 12/01/17 2:46:23 PM #166:	glitteringfairy posted... This time guys! What? Nah, this is just another part of the larger picture of Mueller taking his time and doing his job effectively. Sorry you don't have the attention span for it --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXezjbuzh14 <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:891405199] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>glitteringfairy posted...</cite> <quote>This time guys!</quote> What? Nah, this is just another part of the larger picture of Mueller taking his time and doing his job effectively. Sorry you don't have the attention span for it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bevan306 12/01/17 2:46:59 PM #167:	lol. Lock him up --- http://rateyourmusic.com/~bevan http://i.imgur.com/5Ta28.jpg <cite>bevan306 posted [p:891405227] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote>lol. Lock him up</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 12/01/17 2:47:43 PM #168:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Zeeak4444 posted... The Admiral posted... Bullet_Wing posted... Are you really going with the narrative that all those people (and everyone who wants Trump gone) are unemployed? I'm comfortable making the claim that the majority of the people at the bar -- which was 10:30 in the morning on a weekday -- are not meaningfully employed, if at all. Its almost like anyone who doesn't work 9-5MF is unemployed to Admril. No wonder he makes so many stupid statements, he's living in his own delusional and self-serving world. He called me unemployed and I work not exactly 9-5 but pretty close. What I do isn't time consuming enough to keep me off gamefaqs the entire day and the boss isn't here much and doesn't really care if anyone slacks off as long as we all get done what we are expected to get done (it's a small family business) It's just baffling. Dude gets worked to the bone so naturally he assumes anyone who doesn't isn't employed. Not even gonna touch on what "meaningful employment" means to someone like that nor am I gonna address the fact that apparently everyone in IT, Healthcare, Public service/safety and so many other fields are apparently not meaningfully employed... and people probably read his statement and were like "Yeah, he's totally right!" --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:891405269] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bullet_Wing posted...</cite> <quote>Are you really going with the narrative that all those people (and everyone who wants Trump gone) are unemployed?</quote> I'm comfortable making the claim that the majority of the people at the bar -- which was 10:30 in the morning on a weekday -- are not meaningfully employed, if at all.</quote> Its almost like anyone who doesn't work 9-5MF is unemployed to Admril. No wonder he makes so many stupid statements, he's living in his own delusional and self-serving world.</quote> He called me unemployed and I work not exactly 9-5 but pretty close. What I do isn't time consuming enough to keep me off gamefaqs the entire day and the boss isn't here much and doesn't really care if anyone slacks off as long as we all get done what we are expected to get done (it's a small family business)</quote> It's just baffling. Dude gets worked to the bone so naturally he assumes anyone who doesn't isn't employed. Not even gonna touch on what "meaningful employment" means to someone like that nor am I gonna address the fact that apparently everyone in IT, Healthcare, Public service/safety and so many other fields are apparently not meaningfully employed... and people probably read his statement and were like "Yeah, he's totally right!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 12/01/17 2:50:36 PM #169:	glitteringfairy posted... This time guys! Isolated incident #1828472 ahahaha --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:891405411] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>glitteringfairy posted...</cite> <quote>This time guys!</quote> Isolated incident #1828472 ahahaha</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SwordMaster13X 12/01/17 2:51:16 PM #170:	That_Happened posted... The Admiral posted... I'm comfortable making the claim that the majority of the people at the bar -- which was 10:30 in the morning on a weekday -- are not meaningfully employed, if at all. Isn't it way more likely that they're college or graduate students, being that most of them look relatively young? It's also possible some of them could have been on a break from work. --- Check out my funny youtube channel I guess... https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh4BPUqx-fUnHjHVgiB-Kbw <cite>SwordMaster13X posted [p:891405446] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>That_Happened posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>I'm comfortable making the claim that the majority of the people at the bar -- which was 10:30 in the morning on a weekday -- are not meaningfully employed, if at all.</quote> Isn't it way more likely that they're college or graduate students, being that most of them look relatively young?</quote> It's also possible some of them could have been on a break from work.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Near_ 12/01/17 2:54:13 PM #171:	The Great Muta 22 posted... glitteringfairy posted... This time guys! What? Nah, this is just another part of the larger picture of Mueller taking his time and doing his job effectively. Sorry you don't have the attention span for it don't worry about it. they'll keep trolling and saying the same shit up until the very end --- https://i.imgur.com/WyFIJkF.gif This is America, where a lying, cheating degenerate can prosper. <cite>_Near_ posted [p:891405623] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Great Muta 22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>glitteringfairy posted...</cite> <quote>This time guys!</quote> What? Nah, this is just another part of the larger picture of Mueller taking his time and doing his job effectively. Sorry you don't have the attention span for it</quote> don't worry about it. they'll keep trolling and saying the same shit up until the very end</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
glitteringfairy 12/01/17 2:55:59 PM #172:	_Near_ posted... The Great Muta 22 posted... glitteringfairy posted... This time guys! What? Nah, this is just another part of the larger picture of Mueller taking his time and doing his job effectively. Sorry you don't have the attention span for it don't worry about it. they'll keep trolling and saying the same shit up until the very end Ya. The end of Trump's term in office lololol --- "How come you can believe in God but not Bigfoot?" V-E-G-Y http://i.imgur.com/AqR3aeX.jpg http://i.imgur.com/vvuUXpp.jpg <cite>glitteringfairy posted [p:891405722] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>_Near_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Great Muta 22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>glitteringfairy posted...</cite> <quote>This time guys!</quote> What? Nah, this is just another part of the larger picture of Mueller taking his time and doing his job effectively. Sorry you don't have the attention span for it</quote> don't worry about it. they'll keep trolling and saying the same shit up until the very end</quote> Ya. The end of Trump's term in office lololol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Near_ 12/01/17 2:56:32 PM #173:	sure not like i have faith that the legal system gives him what he deserves --- https://i.imgur.com/WyFIJkF.gif This is America, where a lying, cheating degenerate can prosper. <cite>_Near_ posted [p:891405753] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote>sure not like i have faith that the legal system gives him what he deserves</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 12/01/17 3:14:57 PM #174:	glitteringfairy posted... _Near_ posted... The Great Muta 22 posted... glitteringfairy posted... This time guys! What? Nah, this is just another part of the larger picture of Mueller taking his time and doing his job effectively. Sorry you don't have the attention span for it don't worry about it. they'll keep trolling and saying the same shit up until the very end Ya. The end of Trump's term in office lololol So sometime in 2018 --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:891406707] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>glitteringfairy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Near_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Great Muta 22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>glitteringfairy posted...</cite> <quote>This time guys!</quote> What? Nah, this is just another part of the larger picture of Mueller taking his time and doing his job effectively. Sorry you don't have the attention span for it</quote> don't worry about it. they'll keep trolling and saying the same shit up until the very end</quote> Ya. The end of Trump's term in office lololol</quote> So sometime in 2018</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 12/01/17 3:51:21 PM #175:	I should start a porn site dedicated to liberals, where the only content is re-enactments of Trump getting impeached. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:891408957] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote>I should start a porn site dedicated to liberals, where the only content is re-enactments of Trump getting impeached.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 12/01/17 3:56:06 PM #176:	The Admiral posted... I should start a porn site dedicated to liberals, where the only content is re-enactments of Trump getting impeached. Aren't you the guy who wanted that bar picture posted and brings up shit like that actress screaming when Trump won the election? You'd probably get more clicks just dedicating one to Trump shills who live off "triggered liberals" tbh --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXezjbuzh14 <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:891409211] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>I should start a porn site dedicated to liberals, where the only content is re-enactments of Trump getting impeached.</quote> Aren't you the guy who wanted that bar picture posted and brings up shit like that actress screaming when Trump won the election? You'd probably get more clicks just dedicating one to Trump shills who live off "triggered liberals" tbh</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
fire_bolt 12/01/17 4:20:53 PM #177:	Retag --- If her hips don't break, you didn't "carry" hard enough" -SpunkySix http://steamcommunity.com/id/bolt_thundara/wishlist <cite>fire_bolt posted [p:891410636] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote>Retag</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 12/01/17 4:22:08 PM #178:	http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/01/politics/jared-kushner-michael-flynn-russia/index.html Uh oh. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:891410697] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote>http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/01/politics/jared-kushner-michael-flynn-russia/index.html Uh oh.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 12/01/17 4:30:50 PM #179:	The Admiral posted... I should start a porn site dedicated to liberals, where the only content is re-enactments of Trump getting impeached. Trump getting impeached isn't sexual. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:891411203] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>I should start a porn site dedicated to liberals, where the only content is re-enactments of Trump getting impeached.</quote> Trump getting impeached isn't sexual.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 12/01/17 5:14:01 PM #180:	The Admiral posted... I should start a porn site dedicated to liberals, where the only content is re-enactments of Trump getting impeached. Well luckily you probably wont have to wait long to get it up and running. --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:891413633] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>I should start a porn site dedicated to liberals, where the only content is re-enactments of Trump getting impeached.</quote> Well luckily you probably wont have to wait long to get it up and running.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 12/01/17 6:41:56 PM #181:	When did Admiral become the typical lol Libruhls libcuck! Loser? He used to be against liberals but at least pretended to be smart. --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:891417906] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote>When did Admiral become the typical lol Libruhls libcuck! Loser? He used to be against liberals but at least pretended to be smart.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 12/01/17 7:41:12 PM #182:	TheVipaGTS posted... When did Admiral become the typical ?lol Libruhls libcuck!? Loser? He used to be against liberals but at least pretended to be smart. In another topic, a user quoted himself because no one answered his question. Admiral showed his wit to still be scalpal-level sharp by calling the user 13 years old. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:891420912] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>When did Admiral become the typical ?lol Libruhls libcuck!? Loser? He used to be against liberals but at least pretended to be smart.</quote> In another topic, a user quoted himself because no one answered his question. Admiral showed his wit to still be scalpal-level sharp by calling the user 13 years old.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#184	Post #184 was unavailable or deleted.
A_Good_Boy 12/02/17 7:52:12 AM #185:	TheVipaGTS posted... When did Admiral become the typical lol Libruhls libcuck! Loser? He used to be against liberals but at least pretended to be smart. He's been like this for years. It's why all of his topics are so cookie cutter cause he almost always makes his topics just to attack liberals, Millennials, or Muslims. He's fairly transparent in his motivations. --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:891444655] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>When did Admiral become the typical lol Libruhls libcuck! Loser? He used to be against liberals but at least pretended to be smart.</quote> He's been like this for years. It's why all of his topics are so cookie cutter cause he almost always makes his topics just to attack liberals, Millennials, or Muslims. He's fairly transparent in his motivations.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nicklebro 12/02/17 8:02:55 AM #186:	Reality is fake news. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:891444855] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote>Reality is fake news.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BignutzisBack 12/02/17 12:09:48 PM #187:	lol at this topic --- http://i.imgur.com/plA0Vg9.gif http://i.minus.com/iluvk8aR4mzC8.gif <cite>BignutzisBack posted [p:891453180] in Michael Fl... [t:76050320]...</cite> <quote>lol at this topic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > Michael Flynn charged with making false statement to FBI (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Michael Flynn charged with making false statement to FBI