Current Events > author of Trump book Fire and Fury admits some of the content is false

Topic List	Page List: 1
daftpunk_mk5 01/06/18 5:39:23 PM #1:	https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jan/5/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-author-admits-not-all-/ Lmao what a joke. --- Some say that his voice can only be heard by cats, and that he has two sets of knees... all we know is, he's called the Stig. <cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted [p:893547412] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote>https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jan/5/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-author-admits-not-all-/ Lmao what a joke.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
lilORANG 01/06/18 5:42:53 PM #2:	Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok. --- #FeelTheBern http://i.imgur.com/q5z4CUu.jpg http://i.imgur.com/6B9oFXh.jpg http://i.imgur.com/sy42Dlf.jpg <cite>lilORANG posted [p:893547621] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote>Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 01/06/18 5:43:13 PM #3:	Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying. --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:893547640] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote>Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Life Sympathy 01/06/18 5:44:52 PM #4:	Calling someone who is being transparent with their audience a joke? Man no wonder the nation is in the toilet. --- We're surrounding you. We see you, but you probably don't see us. And if you see us, we're not letting on that we see you. <cite>Life Sympathy posted [p:893547725] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote>Calling someone who is being transparent with their audience a joke? Man no wonder the nation is in the toilet.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eggcorn 01/06/18 5:45:47 PM #5:	TheVipaGTS posted... Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying. LMAO what makes your interpretation more valid than TCs? <cite>eggcorn posted [p:893547781] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying.</quote> LMAO what makes your interpretation more valid than TCs?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DrizztLink 01/06/18 5:46:24 PM #6:	For all the whining about fake news, Trumpanzees sure do employ it freely. --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:893547813] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote>For all the whining about fake news, Trumpanzees sure do employ it freely.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ChainedRedone 01/06/18 5:46:37 PM #7:	eggcorn posted... TheVipaGTS posted... Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying. LMAO what makes your interpretation more valid than TCs? Besides the fact that's exactly what he's saying if you had any basic reading comprehension? --- David Mink. Hero. https://c1.staticflickr.com/7/6043/6337878059_009dd4c4f3_z.jpg <cite>ChainedRedone posted [p:893547823] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying.</quote> LMAO what makes your interpretation more valid than TCs?</quote> Besides the fact that's exactly what he's saying if you had any basic reading comprehension?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 01/06/18 5:46:42 PM #8:	eggcorn posted... TheVipaGTS posted... Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying. LMAO what makes your interpretation more valid than TCs? The quote in the article doesnt at all imply that this content is false? Did you read it? --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:893547827] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying.</quote> LMAO what makes your interpretation more valid than TCs?</quote> The quote in the article doesnt at all imply that this content is false? Did you read it?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Slip-N-Slide 01/06/18 5:47:41 PM #9:	ChainedRedone posted... eggcorn posted... TheVipaGTS posted... Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying. LMAO what makes your interpretation more valid than TCs? Besides the fact that's exactly what he's saying if you had any basic reading comprehension? --- Get wet. http://i.imgtc.com/2q3z3TmhFO.jpg <cite>Slip-N-Slide posted [p:893547880] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>ChainedRedone posted...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote> Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying. </quote> LMAO what makes your interpretation more valid than TCs?</quote> Besides the fact that's exactly what he's saying if you had any basic reading comprehension?</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axiom 01/06/18 5:47:55 PM #10:	Trump the habitual liar that never admits wrongdoing even when caught is fine but an author who is upfront and honest isn't. Trump's America <cite>Axiom posted [p:893547895] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote>Trump the habitual liar that never admits wrongdoing even when caught is fine but an author who is upfront and honest isn't. Trump's America</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Complete_Idi0t 01/06/18 5:48:10 PM #11:	Know what else has conflicting accounts of events? The Bible. Xd christianity destroyed <cite>Complete_Idi0t posted [p:893547910] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote>Know what else has conflicting accounts of events? The Bible. Xd christianity destroyed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CookieMarvin 01/06/18 5:48:33 PM #12:	eggcorn posted... TheVipaGTS posted... Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying. LMAO what makes your interpretation more valid than TCs? someone didnt read the article --- http://i.imgur.com/4Llom.png <cite>CookieMarvin posted [p:893547930] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying.</quote> LMAO what makes your interpretation more valid than TCs?</quote> someone didnt read the article</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 01/06/18 5:49:55 PM #13:	Yeah Dinesh D'Souza would never admit that he made up stuff in his books. --- No sig. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:893548008] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote>Yeah Dinesh D'Souza would never admit that he made up stuff in his books.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eggcorn 01/06/18 5:50:19 PM #14:	CookieMarvin posted... eggcorn posted... TheVipaGTS posted... Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying. LMAO what makes your interpretation more valid than TCs? someone didnt read the article thats true <cite>eggcorn posted [p:893548035] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>CookieMarvin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>Hes just saying to take it with a grain of salt and understand that most of what comes from that White House are stretched truths. Not that he flat out made stuff up like youre implying.</quote> LMAO what makes your interpretation more valid than TCs?</quote> someone didnt read the article</quote> thats true</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
0AbsoluteZero0 01/06/18 5:52:56 PM #15:	Complete_Idi0t posted... Know what else has conflicting accounts of events? The Bible. Xd christianity destroyed CHECKMATE CHRISTIANS --- -The Admirable <cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted [p:893548210] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>Complete_Idi0t posted...</cite> <quote>Know what else has conflicting accounts of events? The Bible. Xd christianity destroyed</quote> CHECKMATE CHRISTIANS</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hollow_shrine 01/06/18 5:54:42 PM #16:	He lets the interviewees speak for themselves, and when necessary attempts to provide surrounding context for their comments. The truth likely lies somewhere in between these interviews. What's clear is that there is a great deal of internal chaos within the White House and that, thus far, no one trusts each other. --- Whatever happened to standards? Whatever happened to bare minimums? https://i.imgtc.com/7UnK3hx.jpg <cite>hollow_shrine posted [p:893548328] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote>He lets the interviewees speak for themselves, and when necessary attempts to provide surrounding context for their comments. The truth likely lies somewhere in between these interviews. What's clear is that there is a great deal of internal chaos within the White House and that, thus far, no one trusts each other.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
daftpunk_mk5 01/06/18 5:56:24 PM #17:	lilORANG posted... Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok. "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility --- Some say that his voice can only be heard by cats, and that he has two sets of knees... all we know is, he's called the Stig. <cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted [p:893548453] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>lilORANG posted...</cite> <quote>Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok.</quote> "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DrizztLink 01/06/18 5:57:51 PM #18:	daftpunk_mk5 posted... lilORANG posted... Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok. "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility He's doubling down. Bold strategy Cotton --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:893548553] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>lilORANG posted...</cite> <quote>Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok.</quote> "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility</quote> He's doubling down. Bold strategy Cotton</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 01/06/18 5:58:59 PM #19:	daftpunk_mk5 posted... lilORANG posted... Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok. "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility Not like those books that go into detail over Obama and Hillary's crimes now those are completely credible right? --- No sig. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:893548625] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>lilORANG posted...</cite> <quote>Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok.</quote> "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility</quote> Not like those books that go into detail over Obama and Hillary's crimes now those are completely credible right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 01/06/18 6:01:37 PM #20:	Wolff has a history of playing loose with the facts, but this is not that sort of admission --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:893548800] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote>Wolff has a history of playing loose with the facts, but this is not that sort of admission</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
daftpunk_mk5 01/06/18 6:01:49 PM #21:	creativerealms posted... daftpunk_mk5 posted... lilORANG posted... Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok. "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility Not like those books that go into detail over Obama and Hillary's crimes now those are completely credible right? Clintons emails were verified. No need for interpretation. --- Some say that his voice can only be heard by cats, and that he has two sets of knees... all we know is, he's called the Stig. <cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted [p:893548805] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>lilORANG posted...</cite> <quote>Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok.</quote> "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility</quote> Not like those books that go into detail over Obama and Hillary's crimes now those are completely credible right?</quote> Clintons emails were verified. No need for interpretation.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 01/06/18 6:13:35 PM #22:	daftpunk_mk5 posted... lilORANG posted... Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok. "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility Thats still not what the quote says but youre getting there. There is no way for him to completely verify what is said in these interviews. Hes telling the readers that they should know that and read with that in mind. Why is this so difficult for you. This the first time youve heard of a book or story like this? --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:893549490] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>lilORANG posted...</cite> <quote>Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok.</quote> "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility</quote> Thats still not what the quote says but youre getting there. There is no way for him to completely verify what is said in these interviews. Hes telling the readers that they should know that and read with that in mind. Why is this so difficult for you. This the first time youve heard of a book or story like this?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
daftpunk_mk5 01/06/18 6:18:36 PM #23:	TheVipaGTS posted... daftpunk_mk5 posted... lilORANG posted... Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok. "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility Thats still not what the quote says but youre getting there. There is no way for him to completely verify what is said in these interviews. Hes telling the readers that they should know that and read with that in mind. Why is this so difficult for you. This the first time youve heard of a book or story like this? Its slander and character attack if he's publishing unverified claims. He's marketing the book as an inside look at the trump admin and just using that disclaimer to cover his ass. --- Some say that his voice can only be heard by cats, and that he has two sets of knees... all we know is, he's called the Stig. <cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted [p:893549779] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>lilORANG posted...</cite> <quote>Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok.</quote> "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility</quote> Thats still not what the quote says but youre getting there. There is no way for him to completely verify what is said in these interviews. Hes telling the readers that they should know that and read with that in mind. Why is this so difficult for you. This the first time youve heard of a book or story like this?</quote> Its slander and character attack if he's publishing unverified claims. He's marketing the book as an inside look at the trump admin and just using that disclaimer to cover his ass.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blue_Inigo 01/06/18 6:21:24 PM #24:	daftpunk_mk5 posted... TheVipaGTS posted... daftpunk_mk5 posted... lilORANG posted... Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok. "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility Thats still not what the quote says but youre getting there. There is no way for him to completely verify what is said in these interviews. Hes telling the readers that they should know that and read with that in mind. Why is this so difficult for you. This the first time youve heard of a book or story like this? Its slander and character attack if he's publishing unverified claims. He's marketing the book as an inside look at the trump admin and just using that disclaimer to cover his ass. Wipe the shit off your nose bruh --- "This is your last dance." <cite>Blue_Inigo posted [p:893549949] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>lilORANG posted...</cite> <quote>Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok.</quote> "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility</quote> Thats still not what the quote says but youre getting there. There is no way for him to completely verify what is said in these interviews. Hes telling the readers that they should know that and read with that in mind. Why is this so difficult for you. This the first time youve heard of a book or story like this?</quote> Its slander and character attack if he's publishing unverified claims. He's marketing the book as an inside look at the trump admin and just using that disclaimer to cover his ass.</quote> Wipe the shit off your nose bruh</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BLAKUboy 01/06/18 6:21:24 PM #25:	daftpunk_mk5 posted... Its slander and character attack if he's publishing unverified claims. That's not how that works. --- Aeris dies if she takes more damage than her current HP - Panthera http://signavatar.com/26999_s.png <cite>BLAKUboy posted [p:893549951] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote>Its slander and character attack if he's publishing unverified claims.</quote> That's not how that works.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
lilORANG 01/06/18 6:29:05 PM #26:	daftpunk_mk5 posted... TheVipaGTS posted... daftpunk_mk5 posted... lilORANG posted... ?Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book.? ?Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true.? that's not really what he's saying but ok. "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility That?s still not what the quote says but you?re getting there. There is no way for him to completely verify what is said in these interviews. He?s telling the readers that they should know that and read with that in mind. Why is this so difficult for you. This the first time you?ve heard of a book or story like this? Its slander and character attack if he's publishing unverified claims. He's marketing the book as an inside look at the trump admin and just using that disclaimer to cover his ass. Not if he's up front with everyone that he's simply reporting what was told to him. Which is exactly what the prologue accomplishes. --- #FeelTheBernieSanders <cite>lilORANG posted [p:893550407] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>lilORANG posted...</cite> <quote>?Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book.? ?Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true.? that's not really what he's saying but ok.</quote> "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility</quote> That?s still not what the quote says but you?re getting there. There is no way for him to completely verify what is said in these interviews. He?s telling the readers that they should know that and read with that in mind. Why is this so difficult for you. This the first time you?ve heard of a book or story like this?</quote> Its slander and character attack if he's publishing unverified claims. He's marketing the book as an inside look at the trump admin and just using that disclaimer to cover his ass.</quote> Not if he's up front with everyone that he's simply reporting what was told to him. Which is exactly what the prologue accomplishes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Life Sympathy 01/06/18 7:08:34 PM #28:	daftpunk_mk5 posted... Its slander and character attack if he's publishing unverified claims. He's marketing the book as an inside look at the trump admin and just using that disclaimer to cover his ass. SCOTUS disagrees with this. They have ruled that if a publication against a public official is made in good faith, it cannot be counted as defamation: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/390/727/case.html --- We're surrounding you. We see you, but you probably don't see us. And if you see us, we're not letting on that we see you. <cite>Life Sympathy posted [p:893552846] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote>Its slander and character attack if he's publishing unverified claims. He's marketing the book as an inside look at the trump admin and just using that disclaimer to cover his ass.</quote> SCOTUS disagrees with this. They have ruled that if a publication against a public official is made in good faith, it cannot be counted as defamation: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/390/727/case.html</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 01/06/18 9:10:47 PM #29:	daftpunk_mk5 posted... creativerealms posted... daftpunk_mk5 posted... lilORANG posted... Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok. "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility Not like those books that go into detail over Obama and Hillary's crimes now those are completely credible right? Clintons emails were verified. No need for interpretation. As were the murders she caused, her being behind a pedophile ring, and all the countless other things people claims she done. She used the wrong female account lock her away. --- No sig. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:893560418] in author of ... [t:76174812]...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>lilORANG posted...</cite> <quote>Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book. Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. that's not really what he's saying but ok.</quote> "Trump says things that are untrue so I will too" Book has 0 credibility</quote> Not like those books that go into detail over Obama and Hillary's crimes now those are completely credible right?</quote> Clintons emails were verified. No need for interpretation.</quote> As were the murders she caused, her being behind a pedophile ring, and all the countless other things people claims she done. She used the wrong female account lock her away.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > author of Trump book Fire and Fury admits some of the content is false (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > author of Trump book Fire and Fury admits some of the content is false