3 in the house and senate and repealed the 2nd amendment?

Topic List	Page List: 1
Fam_Fam 02/15/18 10:18:14 AM #1:	80/80 what would actually happen? realistically? <cite>Fam_Fam posted [p:896129624] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>80/80 what would actually happen? realistically?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Burgess 02/15/18 10:19:47 AM #2:	They wouldn't do that. --- Burgess [Z?] ...follow the Mod that failed. "All that typing made me have to crap."~Dark Magic Vixen <cite>Burgess posted [p:896129692] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>They wouldn't do that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fam_Fam 02/15/18 10:22:31 AM #3:	Burgess posted... They wouldn't do that. that's not the point of the topic. <cite>Fam_Fam posted [p:896129821] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>Burgess posted...</cite> <quote>They wouldn't do that.</quote> that's not the point of the topic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CableZL 02/15/18 10:23:10 AM #4:	They wouldn't be able to do that with a supermajority in Congress. It takes more than that to add/remove a constitutional amendment. --- http://i.imgur.com/ByKGlJb.gif http://i.imgur.com/nZdaA8D.gif http://i.imgur.com/VBLBILg.jpg <cite>CableZL posted [p:896129854] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>They wouldn't be able to do that with a supermajority in Congress. It takes more than that to add/remove a constitutional amendment.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fam_Fam 02/15/18 10:26:10 AM #5:	CableZL posted... They wouldn't be able to do that with a supermajority in Congress. It takes more than that to add/remove a constitutional amendment. ok suppose they had the supermajority, and they had enough pull in the states to get it done. what would happen after? <cite>Fam_Fam posted [p:896129986] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote>They wouldn't be able to do that with a supermajority in Congress. It takes more than that to add/remove a constitutional amendment.</quote> ok suppose they had the supermajority, and they had enough pull in the states to get it done. what would happen after?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 02/15/18 10:27:59 AM #6:	Repealing a right itself wouldn't do anything immediately; there would then have to be laws restricting/banning guns before real effects happened. --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:896130067] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>Repealing a right itself wouldn't do anything immediately; there would then have to be laws restricting/banning guns before real effects happened.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fam_Fam 02/15/18 10:29:13 AM #7:	Antifar posted... Repealing a right itself wouldn't do anything immediately; there would then have to be laws restricting/banning guns before real effects happened. yes, so what would happen if they repealed the right? <cite>Fam_Fam posted [p:896130131] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Repealing a right itself wouldn't do anything immediately; there would then have to be laws restricting/banning guns before real effects happened.</quote> yes, so what would happen if they repealed the right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DevsBro 02/15/18 10:30:34 AM #8:	Well I suppose one effect would be the internet would stop talking about it. --- http://backloggery.com/devsbro/sig.gif http://i.imgur.com/kU5vu5N.png Never pepper popcorn <cite>DevsBro posted [p:896130190] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>Well I suppose one effect would be the internet would stop talking about it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 02/15/18 10:30:41 AM #9:	Fam_Fam posted... Antifar posted... Repealing a right itself wouldn't do anything immediately; there would then have to be laws restricting/banning guns before real effects happened. yes, so what would happen if they repealed the right? Good old fashion civil war when the democrats lose.... again --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:896130197] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>Fam_Fam posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Repealing a right itself wouldn't do anything immediately; there would then have to be laws restricting/banning guns before real effects happened.</quote> yes, so what would happen if they repealed the right?</quote> Good old fashion civil war when the democrats lose.... again</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
addled 02/15/18 10:36:45 AM #10:	I don't think Congress can repeal an amendment. It would take 2/3 of both Houses propose the change then 3/4 of the states would have to approve it. I think that's how it works. Good luck with that repeal. --- Practice random acts of mindlessness. <cite>addled posted [p:896130463] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>I don't think Congress can repeal an amendment. It would take 2/3 of both Houses propose the change then 3/4 of the states would have to approve it. I think that's how it works. Good luck with that repeal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 02/15/18 10:36:48 AM #11:	Fam_Fam posted... CableZL posted... They wouldn't be able to do that with a supermajority in Congress. It takes more than that to add/remove a constitutional amendment. ok suppose they had the supermajority, and they had enough pull in the states to get it done. what would happen after? immediately, nothing. They'd just be able to pass stricter laws regarding gun ownership --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:896130464] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>Fam_Fam posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote>They wouldn't be able to do that with a supermajority in Congress. It takes more than that to add/remove a constitutional amendment.</quote> ok suppose they had the supermajority, and they had enough pull in the states to get it done. what would happen after?</quote> immediately, nothing. They'd just be able to pass stricter laws regarding gun ownership</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Complete_Idi0t 02/15/18 10:37:51 AM #12:	Something about cold, dead hands Either that or people would drop their guns off at three nearest police station immediately <cite>Complete_Idi0t posted [p:896130512] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>Something about cold, dead hands Either that or people would drop their guns off at three nearest police station immediately</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hollow_shrine 02/15/18 10:41:55 AM #13:	That's what checks and balances are for, and unless the entire supreme court just up and dies and Trump somehow appoints a new judicial bench of anti-gun justices, that's not happening. That will never happen. Both houses of congress could be 100% democratic and it would still never happen. Why can't y'all come up with political apocalypse fantasies that at least make sense? --- Whatever happened to standards? Whatever happened to bare minimums? https://i.imgtc.com/7UnK3hx.jpg <cite>hollow_shrine posted [p:896130725] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>That's what checks and balances are for, and unless the entire supreme court just up and dies and Trump somehow appoints a new judicial bench of anti-gun justices, that's not happening. That will never happen. Both houses of congress could be 100% democratic and it would still never happen. Why can't y'all come up with political apocalypse fantasies that at least make sense?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Iodine 02/15/18 10:43:22 AM #14:	hollow_shrine posted... That's what checks and balances are for, and unless the entire supreme court just up and dies and Trump somehow appoints a new judicial bench of anti-gun justices, that's not happening. That will never happen. Both houses of congress could be 100% democratic and it would still never happen. Why can't y'all come up with political apocalypse fantasies that at least make sense? --- In Belichick we Trust <cite>Iodine posted [p:896130791] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>hollow_shrine posted...</cite> <quote>That's what checks and balances are for, and unless the entire supreme court just up and dies and Trump somehow appoints a new judicial bench of anti-gun justices, that's not happening. That will never happen. Both houses of congress could be 100% democratic and it would still never happen. Why can't y'all come up with political apocalypse fantasies that at least make sense?</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#15	Post #15 was unavailable or deleted.
Balrog0 02/15/18 10:44:34 AM #16:	they would honestly probably enact a lot of really stupid measures that would satisfy people who are sick of the NRA, but would not be effective at curbing gun violence TBQH imho --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:896130857] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>they would honestly probably enact a lot of really stupid measures that would satisfy people who are sick of the NRA, but would not be effective at curbing gun violence TBQH imho</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 02/15/18 10:46:23 AM #17:	Iodine posted... hollow_shrine posted... That's what checks and balances are for, and unless the entire supreme court just up and dies and Trump somehow appoints a new judicial bench of anti-gun justices, that's not happening. That will never happen. Both houses of congress could be 100% democratic and it would still never happen. Why can't y'all come up with political apocalypse fantasies that at least make sense? What does the SCOTUS have to do with it? The only thing this scenario is missing is that after proposing the amendment change, it would require 2/3 of state legislatures to agree to it. Which is also unrealistic, but it has nothing to do with the other branches of government --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:896130925] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>Iodine posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hollow_shrine posted...</cite> <quote>That's what checks and balances are for, and unless the entire supreme court just up and dies and Trump somehow appoints a new judicial bench of anti-gun justices, that's not happening. That will never happen. Both houses of congress could be 100% democratic and it would still never happen. Why can't y'all come up with political apocalypse fantasies that at least make sense?</quote></quote> What does the SCOTUS have to do with it? The only thing this scenario is missing is that after proposing the amendment change, it would require 2/3 of state legislatures to agree to it. Which is also unrealistic, but it has nothing to do with the other branches of government</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Giant_Aspirin 02/15/18 10:46:54 AM #18:	i honestly would fear that it would start a war given how intensely the pro-gun folk feel about their firearms. they would stand by the "pry them from my cold, dead hands" slogan and would legit try to fight the government, im pretty sure. it would not be pretty --- Playing: Dark Souls III (PC), Hollow Knight (PC) *(~);} - Get out the pans, don't just stand there dreamin' - {;(~)* <cite>Giant_Aspirin posted [p:896130954] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>i honestly would fear that it would start a war given how intensely the pro-gun folk feel about their firearms. they would stand by the "pry them from my cold, dead hands" slogan and would legit try to fight the government, im pretty sure. it would not be pretty</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 02/15/18 10:48:09 AM #19:	34 states would have to ratify. https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A5.html <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:896131021] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>34 states would have to ratify. https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A5.html</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426 02/15/18 10:48:18 AM #20:	hollow_shrine posted... That's what checks and balances are for, and unless the entire supreme court just up and dies and Trump somehow appoints a new judicial bench of anti-gun justices, that's not happening. That will never happen. Both houses of congress could be 100% democratic and it would still never happen. Why can't y'all come up with political apocalypse fantasies that at least make sense? The Supreme Court only gets a say in constitutional amendments if the rules for them aren't followed. If they are they being followed the Supreme Court can't stop them. <cite>JE19426 posted [p:896131027] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>hollow_shrine posted...</cite> <quote>That's what checks and balances are for, and unless the entire supreme court just up and dies and Trump somehow appoints a new judicial bench of anti-gun justices, that's not happening. That will never happen. Both houses of congress could be 100% democratic and it would still never happen. Why can't y'all come up with political apocalypse fantasies that at least make sense?</quote> The Supreme Court only gets a say in constitutional amendments if the rules for them aren't followed. If they are they being followed the Supreme Court can't stop them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wackyteen 02/15/18 10:49:05 AM #21:	Balrog0 posted... What does the SCOTUS have to do with it? The only thing this scenario is missing is that after proposing the amendment change, it would require 2/3 of state legislatures to agree to it. Which is also unrealistic, but it has nothing to do with the other branches of government https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztVMib1T4T4 --- The name is wackyteen* for a reason. Never doubt. *No longer teen <cite>wackyteen posted [p:896131058] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>What does the SCOTUS have to do with it? </cite>The only thing this scenario is missing is that after proposing the amendment change, it would require 2/3 of state legislatures to agree to it. Which is also unrealistic, but it has nothing to do with the other branches of government </quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztVMib1T4T4</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 02/15/18 10:50:57 AM #22:	hmm, I'm not sure if I'm being trolled or if you are so ignorant about the roles of the different branches of government that you think I'm the one who is ignorant about those things --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:896131132] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>hmm, I'm not sure if I'm being trolled or if you are so ignorant about the roles of the different branches of government that you think I'm the one who is ignorant about those things</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wackyteen 02/15/18 10:51:04 AM #23:	But on the real though I don't think anybody in the history of the United States would gamble their political supermajority on changing one of the Amendments in the Bill of Rights --- The name is wackyteen* for a reason. Never doubt. *No longer teen <cite>wackyteen posted [p:896131136] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>But on the real though I don't think anybody in the history of the United States would gamble their political supermajority on changing one of the Amendments in the Bill of Rights</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Barenziah Boy Toy 02/15/18 10:53:09 AM #24:	Fam_Fam posted... 80/80 what would actually happen? realistically? They would then need 38/50 state legislatures to sign off on it. That definitely ain't happening. --- You don't need a treaty to have free trade. M Rothbard {Self-Hating Token Asian of the Ivory Tower's Zionist Elite} <cite>Barenziah Boy Toy posted [p:896131236] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>Fam_Fam posted...</cite> <quote>80/80 what would actually happen? realistically?</quote> They would then need 38/50 state legislatures to sign off on it. That definitely ain't happening.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Complete_Idi0t 02/15/18 10:56:09 AM #25:	If the Supreme Court declares something unconstitutional, it is. If they decided to ignore what the Constitution actually says and claim that a (hopefully fictional) law making it a crime to say mean things about the president is constitutional, than it is. Isn't that how it works? <cite>Complete_Idi0t posted [p:896131368] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>If the Supreme Court declares something unconstitutional, it is. If they decided to ignore what the Constitution actually says and claim that a (hopefully fictional) law making it a crime to say mean things about the president is constitutional, than it is. Isn't that how it works?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DanHarenChamp 02/15/18 10:57:51 AM #26:	Amendments have to be approved by 75% of the states individually I thought --- literally the jags <cite>DanHarenChamp posted [p:896131442] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>Amendments have to be approved by 75% of the states individually I thought</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KazumaKiryu 02/15/18 11:00:45 AM #27:	Then all the guns would magically disappear and there would be no more shootings. It would be glorious! --- Just your bad luck... to run into me. <cite>KazumaKiryu posted [p:896131592] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>Then all the guns would magically disappear and there would be no more shootings. It would be glorious!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thelovefist 02/15/18 11:05:09 AM #28:	Obviously the King of England would come to the USA to try to bully people and tell them what to do. --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:896131795] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>Obviously the King of England would come to the USA to try to bully people and tell them what to do.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Newhopes 02/15/18 11:10:58 AM #29:	Burgess posted... They wouldn't do that. Yes they would. <cite>Newhopes posted [p:896132065] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>Burgess posted...</cite> <quote>They wouldn't do that.</quote> Yes they would.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
voldothegr8 02/15/18 11:11:48 AM #30:	You can't repeal the Bill of Rights, only add amendments to it. And it's hard to add amendments. --- Oda break tracker 2018- 1 (1) \| THE Ohio State: 11-2 \| Oakland Raiders: 6-10 Super Mario Maker Profile: 1237-0000-0073-02FE <cite>voldothegr8 posted [p:896132110] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>You can't repeal the Bill of Rights, only add amendments to it. And it's hard to add amendments.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 02/15/18 11:12:55 AM #31:	voldothegr8 posted... You can't repeal the Bill of Rights, only add amendments to it. And it's hard to add amendments. you can add an amendment that repeals a previous part of the constitution, including previous amendments which includes the bill of rights --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:896132179] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>voldothegr8 posted...</cite> <quote>You can't repeal the Bill of Rights, only add amendments to it. And it's hard to add amendments.</quote> you can add an amendment that repeals a previous part of the constitution, including previous amendments which includes the bill of rights</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DevsBro 02/15/18 11:14:22 AM #32:	Complete_Idi0t posted... If the Supreme Court declares something unconstitutional, it is. If they decided to ignore what the Constitution actually says and claim that a (hopefully fictional) law making it a crime to say mean things about the president is constitutional, than it is. Isn't that how it works? Pretty much, yeah. --- http://backloggery.com/devsbro/sig.gif http://i.imgur.com/kU5vu5N.png Never pepper popcorn <cite>DevsBro posted [p:896132268] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>Complete_Idi0t posted...</cite> <quote>If the Supreme Court declares something unconstitutional, it is. If they decided to ignore what the Constitution actually says and claim that a (hopefully fictional) law making it a crime to say mean things about the president is constitutional, than it is. Isn't that how it works?</quote> Pretty much, yeah.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 02/15/18 11:16:52 AM #33:	DevsBro posted... Complete_Idi0t posted... If the Supreme Court declares something unconstitutional, it is. If they decided to ignore what the Constitution actually says and claim that a (hopefully fictional) law making it a crime to say mean things about the president is constitutional, than it is. Isn't that how it works? Pretty much, yeah. If you want to see some shit go sideways, wait until the day SCOTUS decides the 2nd amendment doesn't actually mean what it has meant for 200-some years. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:896132412] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>DevsBro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Complete_Idi0t posted...</cite> <quote>If the Supreme Court declares something unconstitutional, it is. If they decided to ignore what the Constitution actually says and claim that a (hopefully fictional) law making it a crime to say mean things about the president is constitutional, than it is. Isn't that how it works?</quote> Pretty much, yeah.</quote> If you want to see some shit go sideways, wait until the day SCOTUS decides the 2nd amendment doesn't actually mean what it has meant for 200-some years.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426 02/15/18 12:31:54 PM #34:	voldothegr8 posted... You can't repeal the Bill of Rights, only add amendments to it. You most certainly repeal the Bill of Rights. You can also repeal only parts of it. <cite>JE19426 posted [p:896136674] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>voldothegr8 posted...</cite> <quote>You can't repeal the Bill of Rights, only add amendments to it.</quote> You most certainly repeal the Bill of Rights. You can also repeal only parts of it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 02/15/18 12:34:50 PM #35:	The Democrats never do it when they have the chance. Why? Simple they know better. Banning guns will cause more trouble then it's worth and will probably lead to a civil war. So even if they want to they know they can't. --- No sig. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:896136831] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>The Democrats never do it when they have the chance. Why? Simple they know better. Banning guns will cause more trouble then it's worth and will probably lead to a civil war. So even if they want to they know they can't.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 02/15/18 2:34:28 PM #36:	voldothegr8 posted... You can't repeal the Bill of Rights, only add amendments to it. And it's hard to add amendments. the bill of rights is literally just the first 10 amendments to the constitution because when the constitution was originally drafted they could not get enough states to ratify it. The first 10 amendments were added to appease various state heads. --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:896143853] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>voldothegr8 posted...</cite> <quote>You can't repeal the Bill of Rights, only add amendments to it. And it's hard to add amendments.</quote> the bill of rights is literally just the first 10 amendments to the constitution because when the constitution was originally drafted they could not get enough states to ratify it. The first 10 amendments were added to appease various state heads.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MorbidFaithless 02/15/18 2:38:35 PM #37:	Why are gun owners so bloodthirsty? Would they really rather kill their friends, family, and neighbors instead of having a society with no guns? Weird. --- walk like thunder <cite>MorbidFaithless posted [p:896144094] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>Why are gun owners so bloodthirsty? Would they really rather kill their friends, family, and neighbors instead of having a society with no guns? Weird.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
addled 02/15/18 7:15:13 PM #38:	Balrog0 posted... hmm, I'm not sure if I'm being trolled or if you are so ignorant about the roles of the different branches of government that you think I'm the one who is ignorant about those things i I'm not sure what you mean here and I am not trolling you. What exactly are you saying? --- Practice random acts of mindlessness. <cite>addled posted [p:896160545] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>hmm, I'm not sure if I'm being trolled or if you are so ignorant about the roles of the different branches of government that you think I'm the one who is ignorant about those things</quote>i I'm not sure what you mean here and I am not trolling you. What exactly are you saying?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dirtycommunist 02/15/18 7:22:44 PM #39:	I would be celebrating in the streets (assuming it was accompanied by nationwide sweeps to take away all the guns). . More realistically, I'm not opposed to the idea of gun ownership, but I think guns and ammunition should be among the most strictly regulated items one could buy (and at no small cost), and there should be way fewer of them. --- ***not actually a communist, only dirty on occasion <cite>dirtycommunist posted [p:896160974] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>I would be celebrating in the streets (assuming it was accompanied by nationwide sweeps to take away all the guns). . More realistically, I'm not opposed to the idea of gun ownership, but I think guns and ammunition should be among the most strictly regulated items one could buy (and at no small cost), and there should be way fewer of them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarthAragorn 02/15/18 7:28:34 PM #40:	creativerealms posted... The Democrats never do it when they have the chance. Why? Simple they know better. Banning guns will cause more trouble then it's worth and will probably lead to a civil war. So even if they want to they know they can't. They've never had a chance in hell at pulling this off --- A thousand eyes, and one. <cite>DarthAragorn posted [p:896161279] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>The Democrats never do it when they have the chance. Why? Simple they know better. Banning guns will cause more trouble then it's worth and will probably lead to a civil war. So even if they want to they know they can't.</quote> They've never had a chance in hell at pulling this off</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dark_Spiret 02/15/18 7:30:23 PM #41:	youd get an insurgency. --- Currently playing: Forza Horizon 3 - Dead Rising - Hitman <cite>Dark_Spiret posted [p:896161384] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>youd get an insurgency.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nativengine 02/15/18 7:38:45 PM #42:	Fam_Fam posted... Antifar posted... Repealing a right itself wouldn't do anything immediately; there would then have to be laws restricting/banning guns before real effects happened. yes, so what would happen if they repealed the right? Hold on, I must consult my fortune teller. --- Jive <cite>nativengine posted [p:896161819] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>Fam_Fam posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Repealing a right itself wouldn't do anything immediately; there would then have to be laws restricting/banning guns before real effects happened.</quote> yes, so what would happen if they repealed the right?</quote> Hold on, I must consult my fortune teller.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
r4X0r 02/15/18 7:40:28 PM #43:	MorbidFaithless posted... Why are gun owners so bloodthirsty? Would they really rather kill their friends, family, and neighbors instead of having a society with no guns? Weird. America will never, ever be a society with no guns. You can make a gun out of ten dollars worth of materials from Home Depot and in the world of 3D printing, there's always going to be guns. All gun bans do is ensure that the people who weren't going to break the law in the first place are unarmed. Lawbreakers do not care if their illegal firearms suddenly become more illegal. --- I faced it all and I stood tall- And did it my way. <cite>r4X0r posted [p:896161923] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>MorbidFaithless posted...</cite> <quote>Why are gun owners so bloodthirsty? Would they really rather kill their friends, family, and neighbors instead of having a society with no guns? Weird.</quote> America will never, ever be a society with no guns. You can make a gun out of ten dollars worth of materials from Home Depot and in the world of 3D printing, there's always going to be guns. All gun bans do is ensure that the people who weren't going to break the law in the first place are unarmed. Lawbreakers do not care if their illegal firearms suddenly become more illegal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
D-Lo_BrownTown 02/15/18 7:44:51 PM #44:	Laugh as the USA finally goes down in flames. --- http://i.imgur.com/dWXgtSb.gif <cite>D-Lo_BrownTown posted [p:896162170] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>Laugh as the USA finally goes down in flames.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fam_Fam 02/15/18 9:48:54 PM #45:	nativengine posted... Fam_Fam posted... Antifar posted... Repealing a right itself wouldn't do anything immediately; there would then have to be laws restricting/banning guns before real effects happened. yes, so what would happen if they repealed the right? Hold on, I must consult my fortune teller. i dont get the point of this? I make a topic posting a hypothetical, and then you come in to shitpost. what's the point? I obviously know that you don't know the answer <cite>Fam_Fam posted [p:896168591] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>nativengine posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Fam_Fam posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Repealing a right itself wouldn't do anything immediately; there would then have to be laws restricting/banning guns before real effects happened.</quote> yes, so what would happen if they repealed the right?</quote> Hold on, I must consult my fortune teller.</quote> i dont get the point of this? I make a topic posting a hypothetical, and then you come in to shitpost. what's the point? I obviously know that you don't know the answer</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 02/15/18 10:04:53 PM #46:	Fam_Fam posted... i dont get the point of this? I make a topic posting a hypothetical, and then you come in to shitpost. what's the point? I obviously know that you don't know the answer the problem is you have a completely open ended hypothetical. You might as well ask "What if you woke up tomorrow and literally everything was different?" like, what kind of fucking answer are you fishing for? Do you have a specific restriction in mind? Why don't you ask about that instead. --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:896169450] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>Fam_Fam posted...</cite> <quote>i dont get the point of this? I make a topic posting a hypothetical, and then you come in to shitpost. what's the point? I obviously know that you don't know the answer </quote> the problem is you have a completely open ended hypothetical. You might as well ask "What if you woke up tomorrow and literally everything was different?" like, what kind of fucking answer are you fishing for? Do you have a specific restriction in mind? Why don't you ask about that instead.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 02/15/18 10:05:55 PM #47:	states would all just pass their own gun ownership laws and it would probably be even worse --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:896169506] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>states would all just pass their own gun ownership laws and it would probably be even worse</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scorpion41 02/15/18 10:08:59 PM #48:	Not much would change other than super liberal states like New York, California, and Illinois finally getting their 100% ban while red states continue business as usual. --- PSN: scorpion_4160 Currently Playing: NCAA 14, Darksiders series(PS3) <cite>scorpion41 posted [p:896169681] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>Not much would change other than super liberal states like New York, California, and Illinois finally getting their 100% ban while red states continue business as usual.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
masticatingman 02/15/18 10:09:14 PM #49:	Hypotheticals are one thing and entirely understandable to pose, but only if they at least have somewhat of a slim chance of legitimately happening. In 2018 in the current political structure, there is no chance this could happen. Also post 47 anyway. Look at Mississippi with how long they kept up with alcohol prohibition. --- I am basically am I. Well, basically. <cite>masticatingman posted [p:896169697] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote>Hypotheticals are one thing and entirely understandable to pose, but only if they at least have somewhat of a slim chance of legitimately happening. In 2018 in the current political structure, there is no chance this could happen. Also post 47 anyway. Look at Mississippi with how long they kept up with alcohol prohibition.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pokemonzero 02/15/18 10:10:50 PM #50:	Complete_Idi0t posted... Something about cold, dead hands Either that or people would drop their guns off at three nearest police station immediately definitely the first line --- pokemon y fc: 2681 3067 3018 mine-fighting type meinfoo/panchem/riolu <cite>pokemonzero posted [p:896169795] in What if th... [t:76321624]...</cite> <quote><cite>Complete_Idi0t posted...</cite> <quote>Something about cold, dead hands Either that or people would drop their guns off at three nearest police station immediately</quote> definitely the first line</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > What if the dems got 2/3 in the house and senate and repealed the 2nd amendment? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > What if the dems got 2/3 in the house and senate and repealed the 2nd amendment?