Current Events > Parkland Survivor David Hogg Tells Media to Stop Naming School Shooters

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Zikten 05/23/18 3:36:09 PM #51:	LightHawKnight posted... apple1986 posted... Zikten posted... eggcorn posted... not gonna happen because each news outlet will be afraid the others will break the news first. not if they make it illegal to break the news. if they do it, fine them and arrest the person who ordered the reporting. do this a few times and the news networks will learn to be scared to break the news Yeah, let's make it illegal to break news. That'll work out alright. They can literally tell the story without ever mentioning the shooter's name. this. Im just asking the name to be censored. they can still talk about 99% of the story <cite>Zikten posted [p:901859288] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>LightHawKnight posted...</cite> <quote><cite>apple1986 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote>not gonna happen because each news outlet will be afraid the others will break the news first.</quote> not if they make it illegal to break the news. if they do it, fine them and arrest the person who ordered the reporting. do this a few times and the news networks will learn to be scared to break the news</quote> Yeah, let's make it illegal to break news. That'll work out alright.</quote> They can literally tell the story without ever mentioning the shooter's name.</quote> this. Im just asking the name to be censored. they can still talk about 99% of the story</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 05/23/18 3:56:58 PM #52:	MedzXVIII posted... liberal telling the liberal media what to do... Waaaaaaahhhh liberal D: --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:901860373] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>MedzXVIII posted...</cite> <quote>liberal telling the liberal media what to do...</quote> Waaaaaaahhhh liberal D:</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
voldothegr8 05/23/18 4:00:21 PM #53:	Zikten posted... LightHawKnight posted... apple1986 posted... Zikten posted... eggcorn posted... not gonna happen because each news outlet will be afraid the others will break the news first. not if they make it illegal to break the news. if they do it, fine them and arrest the person who ordered the reporting. do this a few times and the news networks will learn to be scared to break the news Yeah, let's make it illegal to break news. That'll work out alright. They can literally tell the story without ever mentioning the shooter's name. this. Im just asking the name to be censored. they can still talk about 99% of the story 1st amendment still says hi --- Oda break tracker 2018- 4 (2) \| THE Ohio State: 11-2 \| Oakland Raiders: 6-10 Super Mario Maker Profile: 1237-0000-0073-02FE <cite>voldothegr8 posted [p:901860551] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LightHawKnight posted...</cite> <quote><cite>apple1986 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote>not gonna happen because each news outlet will be afraid the others will break the news first.</quote> not if they make it illegal to break the news. if they do it, fine them and arrest the person who ordered the reporting. do this a few times and the news networks will learn to be scared to break the news</quote> Yeah, let's make it illegal to break news. That'll work out alright.</quote> They can literally tell the story without ever mentioning the shooter's name.</quote> this. Im just asking the name to be censored. they can still talk about 99% of the story</quote> 1st amendment still says hi</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#54	Post #54 was unavailable or deleted.
#55	Post #55 was unavailable or deleted.
LightHawKnight 05/23/18 4:10:16 PM #56:	voldothegr8 posted... Zikten posted... LightHawKnight posted... apple1986 posted... Zikten posted... eggcorn posted... not gonna happen because each news outlet will be afraid the others will break the news first. not if they make it illegal to break the news. if they do it, fine them and arrest the person who ordered the reporting. do this a few times and the news networks will learn to be scared to break the news Yeah, let's make it illegal to break news. That'll work out alright. They can literally tell the story without ever mentioning the shooter's name. this. Im just asking the name to be censored. they can still talk about 99% of the story 1st amendment still says hi What does that even matter? Why do people want to spread the fame of a mass murder? --- The Official Odin of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board. "You know how confusing the whole good-evil concept is for me." <cite>LightHawKnight posted [p:901861090] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>voldothegr8 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LightHawKnight posted...</cite> <quote><cite>apple1986 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote>not gonna happen because each news outlet will be afraid the others will break the news first.</quote> not if they make it illegal to break the news. if they do it, fine them and arrest the person who ordered the reporting. do this a few times and the news networks will learn to be scared to break the news</quote> Yeah, let's make it illegal to break news. That'll work out alright.</quote> They can literally tell the story without ever mentioning the shooter's name.</quote> this. Im just asking the name to be censored. they can still talk about 99% of the story</quote> 1st amendment still says hi</quote> What does that even matter? Why do people want to spread the fame of a mass murder?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#57	Post #57 was unavailable or deleted.
Behaviorism 05/23/18 4:17:15 PM #58:	Yeah that happens then the names are posted all over Twitter and facebook --- I love Sarah Logan(the best girl in WWE) <cite>Behaviorism posted [p:901861478] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote>Yeah that happens then the names are posted all over Twitter and facebook</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dark_Spiret 05/23/18 4:19:22 PM #59:	while i agree, this is another dangerous road to go down. its starting to feel like doing nothing is better than doing something, atleast in the ways people are proposing on both sides. <cite>Dark_Spiret posted [p:901861600] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote>while i agree, this is another dangerous road to go down. its starting to feel like doing nothing is better than doing something, atleast in the ways people are proposing on both sides.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#60	Post #60 was unavailable or deleted.
DifferentialEquation 05/23/18 4:23:17 PM #61:	When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him. --- There's no business to be taxed. <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:901861801] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote>When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 05/23/18 4:33:04 PM #62:	I actually don't know if I agree with this or not tbh... There are fair arguments on both sides. --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:901862323] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote>I actually don't know if I agree with this or not tbh... There are fair arguments on both sides.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
apple1986 05/23/18 4:33:19 PM #63:	The truth should be pervasive. It's up to the individual as to how they react. --- "...the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt." <cite>apple1986 posted [p:901862339] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote>The truth should be pervasive. It's up to the individual as to how they react.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/23/18 4:34:16 PM #64:	There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3 <cite>Howl posted [p:901862396] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote>There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#65	Post #65 was unavailable or deleted.
LightHawKnight 05/23/18 4:36:17 PM #66:	Howl posted... There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc. They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame. --- The Official Odin of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board. "You know how confusing the whole good-evil concept is for me." <cite>LightHawKnight posted [p:901862498] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote>There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc.</quote> They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#67	Post #67 was unavailable or deleted.
LightHawKnight 05/23/18 4:38:34 PM #68:	Conflict posted... LightHawKnight posted... Howl posted... There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc. They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame. hahaha You think when everyone and their grandmother uses the internet that the shooter wouldn't "get much fame" if they didn't say his name on TV? That's pretty funny You think regular people are going to google who the hell the shooter is? No. Regular people will only ever barely read things shown on TV or other sort of news. They will NEVER research on their own, cause that takes effort. --- The Official Odin of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board. "You know how confusing the whole good-evil concept is for me." <cite>LightHawKnight posted [p:901862628] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LightHawKnight posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote>There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc.</quote> They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame.</quote> hahaha You think when everyone and their grandmother uses the internet that the shooter wouldn't "get much fame" if they didn't say his name on TV? That's pretty funny</quote> You think regular people are going to google who the hell the shooter is? No. Regular people will only ever barely read things shown on TV or other sort of news. They will NEVER research on their own, cause that takes effort.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#69	Post #69 was unavailable or deleted.
LightHawKnight 05/23/18 4:40:05 PM #70:	Conflict posted... LightHawKnight posted... Conflict posted... LightHawKnight posted... Howl posted... There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc. They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame. hahaha You think when everyone and their grandmother uses the internet that the shooter wouldn't "get much fame" if they didn't say his name on TV? That's pretty funny You think regular people are going to google who the hell the shooter is? No. Regular people will only ever barely read things shown on TV or other sort of news. They will NEVER research on their own, cause that takes effort. You don't need to 'research on your own' to find out news on the internet. You do if the media never say the murderer's name, specially not on the title of their stupid article. --- The Official Odin of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board. "You know how confusing the whole good-evil concept is for me." <cite>LightHawKnight posted [p:901862710] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LightHawKnight posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LightHawKnight posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote>There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc.</quote> They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame.</quote> hahaha You think when everyone and their grandmother uses the internet that the shooter wouldn't "get much fame" if they didn't say his name on TV? That's pretty funny</quote> You think regular people are going to google who the hell the shooter is? No. Regular people will only ever barely read things shown on TV or other sort of news. They will NEVER research on their own, cause that takes effort.</quote> You don't need to 'research on your own' to find out news on the internet.</quote> You do if the media never say the murderer's name, specially not on the title of their stupid article.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 05/23/18 4:40:24 PM #71:	It's not about information being censored, news outlets would theoretically just agree not to say the name or reveal info about the killer. Like if someone graffiti'd vulgar things on a road the local news would report the story but they wouldn't show the graffiti. --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:901862742] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote>It's not about information being censored, news outlets would theoretically just agree not to say the name or reveal info about the killer. Like if someone graffiti'd vulgar things on a road the local news would report the story but they wouldn't show the graffiti.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/23/18 4:41:05 PM #72:	LightHawKnight posted... Howl posted... There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc. They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame. They'll still get fame online. It may help slightly but I really don't see the point in this especially because most teenagers get almost all their information online today, they don't watch TV as much as older generations. The idea of losers "proving everyone wrong" and "showing them who's a loser" is already pervasive in our culture and it coupled with mental illness is what the actual cause of this is. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3 <cite>Howl posted [p:901862793] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>LightHawKnight posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc.</quote> They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame.</quote> They'll still get fame online. It may help slightly but I really don't see the point in this especially because most teenagers get almost all their information online today, they don't watch TV as much as older generations. The idea of losers "proving everyone wrong" and "showing them who's a loser" is already pervasive in our culture and it coupled with mental illness is what the actual cause of this is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#73	Post #73 was unavailable or deleted.
EnragedSlith 05/23/18 4:43:13 PM #74:	Its inescapable. People worship violence. --- ultimate milf hunter https://imgur.com/lCEdce6 https://imgur.com/2N1Ezia https://imgur.com/ukJ6sPJ https://youtu.be/IDYaHvDiTr4 <cite>EnragedSlith posted [p:901862914] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote>Its inescapable. People worship violence.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
apple1986 05/23/18 4:44:19 PM #75:	Conflict posted... LightHawKnight posted... Howl posted... There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc. They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame. hahaha You think when everyone and their grandmother uses the internet that the shooter wouldn't "get much fame" if they didn't say his name on TV? That's pretty funny My grandmother is dead. --- "...the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt." <cite>apple1986 posted [p:901862987] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LightHawKnight posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote>There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc.</quote> They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame.</quote> hahaha You think when everyone and their grandmother uses the internet that the shooter wouldn't "get much fame" if they didn't say his name on TV? That's pretty funny</quote> My grandmother is dead.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chill02 05/23/18 4:45:26 PM #76:	MrBigly posted... Sane people have been saying this for years. --- Blow your trumpets, Gabriel <cite>chill02 posted [p:901863052] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>MrBigly posted...</cite> <quote>Sane people have been saying this for years.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Malcrasternus 05/23/18 4:46:16 PM #77:	Not making the shooter a celebrity is the stance pro gun advocates have held onto for years. Good to see more people on both sides trying to adopt it, though good fucking luck getting the news media to follow suit. --- https://imgur.com/yNe3tUF 4/15/1951 - 3/18/2014 "But not forgotten." <cite>Malcrasternus posted [p:901863098] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote>Not making the shooter a celebrity is the stance pro gun advocates have held onto for years. Good to see more people on both sides trying to adopt it, though good fucking luck getting the news media to follow suit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/23/18 4:47:11 PM #78:	apple1986 posted... Conflict posted... LightHawKnight posted... Howl posted... There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc. They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame. hahaha You think when everyone and their grandmother uses the internet that the shooter wouldn't "get much fame" if they didn't say his name on TV? That's pretty funny My grandmother is dead. Sorry for your loss, but you saying that was completely irrelevant. His post wasn't directed specifically at you or your grandmother, and that phrase is just meant to mean "most people" not literally every person and every grandmother. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3 <cite>Howl posted [p:901863154] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>apple1986 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>LightHawKnight posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc. </quote> They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame. </quote> hahaha You think when everyone and their grandmother uses the internet that the shooter wouldn't "get much fame" if they didn't say his name on TV? That's pretty funny</quote> My grandmother is dead.</quote> Sorry for your loss, but you saying that was completely irrelevant. His post wasn't directed specifically at you or your grandmother, and that phrase is just meant to mean "most people" not literally every person and every grandmother.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KarmaMuffin 05/23/18 4:50:13 PM #79:	it just feels to me that people feel powerless and obviously want to stop the shootings. We cling to anything we can that presents a solution For some this is a form of strong gun control For others this is teachers packing heat For others it's a mental health crisis And now, it's the media I get it. IDK what the solution is, but there's research for and against practically all of the above. It's just a bad sign to me that gun nuts have been clamoring for this for years and now everyone is taking it. The attack on our media is an insidious move that is gaining ground at a time it shouldn't be I just don't see how there won't be idiots idolizing the crazies whether we know their name or not, it's a feel good gesture and nothing else. <cite>KarmaMuffin posted [p:901863322] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote>it just feels to me that people feel powerless and obviously want to stop the shootings. We cling to anything we can that presents a solution For some this is a form of strong gun control For others this is teachers packing heat For others it's a mental health crisis And now, it's the media I get it. IDK what the solution is, but there's research for and against practically all of the above. It's just a bad sign to me that gun nuts have been clamoring for this for years and now everyone is taking it. The attack on our media is an insidious move that is gaining ground at a time it shouldn't be I just don't see how there won't be idiots idolizing the crazies whether we know their name or not, it's a feel good gesture and nothing else.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
apple1986 05/23/18 4:54:20 PM #80:	Howl posted... apple1986 posted... Conflict posted... LightHawKnight posted... Howl posted... There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc. They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame. hahaha You think when everyone and their grandmother uses the internet that the shooter wouldn't "get much fame" if they didn't say his name on TV? That's pretty funny My grandmother is dead. Sorry for your loss, but you saying that was completely irrelevant. His post wasn't directed specifically at you or your grandmother, and that phrase is just meant to mean "most people" not literally every person and every grandmother. But my grandmother is dead. --- "...the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt." <cite>apple1986 posted [p:901863589] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>apple1986 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>LightHawKnight posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc. </quote> They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame. </quote> hahaha You think when everyone and their grandmother uses the internet that the shooter wouldn't "get much fame" if they didn't say his name on TV? That's pretty funny</quote> My grandmother is dead.</quote> Sorry for your loss, but you saying that was completely irrelevant. His post wasn't directed specifically at you or your grandmother, and that phrase is just meant to mean "most people" not literally every person and every grandmother.</quote> But my grandmother is dead.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/23/18 4:58:55 PM #81:	apple1986 posted... Howl posted... apple1986 posted... Conflict posted... LightHawKnight posted... Howl posted... There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc. They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame. hahaha You think when everyone and their grandmother uses the internet that the shooter wouldn't "get much fame" if they didn't say his name on TV? That's pretty funny My grandmother is dead. Sorry for your loss, but you saying that was completely irrelevant. His post wasn't directed specifically at you or your grandmother, and that phrase is just meant to mean "most people" not literally every person and every grandmother. But my grandmother is dead. I'm sorry for your loss but you saying that was completely irrelevant. His post wasn't directed specifically at you or your grandmother, and that phrase is just meant to mean "most people" not literally every person and every grandmother. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3 <cite>Howl posted [p:901863844] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>apple1986 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>apple1986 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>LightHawKnight posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> There is no law that they could possibly make that would stop people from finding out the identity of every school shooter. Even if every news organization in the US just up and agreed to just not releasing the names and all held that agreement, people would still find out because of facebook, twitter, Instagram and etc. </quote> They don't have to. They just don't have to say his name in media broadcasts so less people learn the murderer's name and he wont get much fame. </quote> hahaha You think when everyone and their grandmother uses the internet that the shooter wouldn't "get much fame" if they didn't say his name on TV? That's pretty funny </quote> My grandmother is dead. </quote> Sorry for your loss, but you saying that was completely irrelevant. His post wasn't directed specifically at you or your grandmother, and that phrase is just meant to mean "most people" not literally every person and every grandmother.</quote> But my grandmother is dead.</quote> I'm sorry for your loss but you saying that was completely irrelevant. His post wasn't directed specifically at you or your grandmother, and that phrase is just meant to mean "most people" not literally every person and every grandmother.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Thunder_Armor 05/23/18 5:01:56 PM #82:	Zikten posted... eggcorn posted... not gonna happen because each news outlet will be afraid the others will break the news first. not if they make it illegal to break the news. if they do it, fine them and arrest the person who ordered the reporting. do this a few times and the news networks will learn to be scared to break the news This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read on this board. --- I should go. <cite>Thunder_Armor posted [p:901864034] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote>not gonna happen because each news outlet will be afraid the others will break the news first.</quote> not if they make it illegal to break the news. if they do it, fine them and arrest the person who ordered the reporting. do this a few times and the news networks will learn to be scared to break the news</quote> This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read on this board.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#83	Post #83 was unavailable or deleted.
apple1986 05/23/18 5:04:48 PM #84:	Thunder_Armor posted... Zikten posted... eggcorn posted... not gonna happen because each news outlet will be afraid the others will break the news first. not if they make it illegal to break the news. if they do it, fine them and arrest the person who ordered the reporting. do this a few times and the news networks will learn to be scared to break the news This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read on this board. This --- "...the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt." <cite>apple1986 posted [p:901864200] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>Thunder_Armor posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote>not gonna happen because each news outlet will be afraid the others will break the news first.</quote> not if they make it illegal to break the news. if they do it, fine them and arrest the person who ordered the reporting. do this a few times and the news networks will learn to be scared to break the news</quote> This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read on this board.</quote> This</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 05/23/18 5:10:41 PM #85:	@DifferentialEquation posted... When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him. Why? Why would liberals be against his suggestion? What about it would be considered bad by them? --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:901864537] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>@DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote>When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him.</quote> Why? Why would liberals be against his suggestion? What about it would be considered bad by them?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Crazyman93 05/23/18 5:12:42 PM #86:	Caution999 posted... wow. I actually agree with him for once. Hell has frozen over. Right? I wish we would as a society stop naming the shooters. I imagine for a number of them "you won't get famous" would be a sizable deterrent. But the media is only out for ratings anymore. --- let's lubricate friction material! ~nickels, Cars & Trucks <cite>Crazyman93 posted [p:901864649] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>Caution999 posted...</cite> <quote>wow. I actually agree with him for once. Hell has frozen over.</quote> Right? I wish we would as a society stop naming the shooters. I imagine for a number of them "you won't get famous" would be a sizable deterrent. But the media is only out for ratings anymore.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/23/18 5:13:17 PM #87:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... @DifferentialEquation posted... When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him. Why? Why would liberals be against his suggestion? What about it would be considered bad by them? Because a lot of media companies are run by liberals and they know that school shootings are ratings gold. Not saying their names in their stories will create backlash or they will lose out to another competing organization that is willing to say their names, and they will want to avoid that at all costs. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3 <cite>Howl posted [p:901864692] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote> When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him.</quote> Why? Why would liberals be against his suggestion? What about it would be considered bad by them?</quote> Because a lot of media companies are run by liberals and they know that school shootings are ratings gold. Not saying their names in their stories will create backlash or they will lose out to another competing organization that is willing to say their names, and they will want to avoid that at all costs.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DifferentialEquation 05/23/18 5:14:41 PM #88:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... @DifferentialEquation posted... When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him. Why? Why would liberals be against his suggestion? What about it would be considered bad by them? Because he made a suggestion that's not "OMG guns are evil! Ban them all!" --- There's no business to be taxed. <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:901864771] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote>When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him.</quote> Why? Why would liberals be against his suggestion? What about it would be considered bad by them?</quote> Because he made a suggestion that's not "OMG guns are evil! Ban them all!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LightHawKnight 05/23/18 5:22:37 PM #89:	Howl posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... @DifferentialEquation posted... When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him. Why? Why would liberals be against his suggestion? What about it would be considered bad by them? Because a lot of media companies are run by liberals and they know that school shootings are ratings gold. Not saying their names in their stories will create backlash or they will lose out to another competing organization that is willing to say their names, and they will want to avoid that at all costs. What backlash? --- The Official Odin of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board. "You know how confusing the whole good-evil concept is for me." <cite>LightHawKnight posted [p:901865225] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote> When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him.</quote> Why? Why would liberals be against his suggestion? What about it would be considered bad by them?</quote> Because a lot of media companies are run by liberals and they know that school shootings are ratings gold. Not saying their names in their stories will create backlash or they will lose out to another competing organization that is willing to say their names, and they will want to avoid that at all costs.</quote> What backlash?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/23/18 6:07:23 PM #90:	LightHawKnight posted... Howl posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... @DifferentialEquation posted... When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him. Why? Why would liberals be against his suggestion? What about it would be considered bad by them? Because a lot of media companies are run by liberals and they know that school shootings are ratings gold. Not saying their names in their stories will create backlash or they will lose out to another competing organization that is willing to say their names, and they will want to avoid that at all costs. What backlash? People will demand for "their right to know." --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3 <cite>Howl posted [p:901867788] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>LightHawKnight posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>@DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote> When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him. </quote> Why? Why would liberals be against his suggestion? What about it would be considered bad by them? </quote> Because a lot of media companies are run by liberals and they know that school shootings are ratings gold. Not saying their names in their stories will create backlash or they will lose out to another competing organization that is willing to say their names, and they will want to avoid that at all costs.</quote> What backlash?</quote> People will demand for "their right to know."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MelbuFrahma4 05/23/18 6:44:14 PM #91:	Funkydog posted... A few places have started doing this, and I think many more need to follow suit. Don't let them live in with notoriety - be it shooters, terrorists or whoever. Let them be a nameless statistic with no face. An individual to be forgotten. Sadly isn't that how the victims are. I don't think many can name 5 victims of school shootings or terror attacks. Victims are forgotten until the next shooting happens. If there wasn't another shooting I don't think the media would be asking Hogg for his opinion right now. These shootings are keeping him in the news. --- "We'll never see Day-Lewis and Kubrick, or Kurosawa and Eastwood, but we have seen Bale and Nolan, a cinematic dream pairing come to life!" <cite>MelbuFrahma4 posted [p:901869840] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funkydog posted...</cite> <quote>A few places have started doing this, and I think many more need to follow suit. Don't let them live in with notoriety - be it shooters, terrorists or whoever. Let them be a nameless statistic with no face. An individual to be forgotten.</quote> Sadly isn't that how the victims are. I don't think many can name 5 victims of school shootings or terror attacks. Victims are forgotten until the next shooting happens. If there wasn't another shooting I don't think the media would be asking Hogg for his opinion right now. These shootings are keeping him in the news.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 05/23/18 8:48:25 PM #92:	DifferentialEquation posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... @DifferentialEquation posted... When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him. Why? Why would liberals be against his suggestion? What about it would be considered bad by them? Because he made a suggestion that's not "OMG guns are evil! Ban them all!" Liberals use the term evil? --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:901876522] in Parkland S... [t:76636020]...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote>When David Hogg accuses people on the pro 2A side of supporting the murder of children and makes other vile comments, the liberal media pushes him into to the spotlight and treats him like a hero. But now that he's made a somewhat sensible suggestion, I suspect a lot liberal outlets will distance themselves from him.</quote> Why? Why would liberals be against his suggestion? What about it would be considered bad by them?</quote> Because he made a suggestion that's not "OMG guns are evil! Ban them all!"</quote> Liberals use the term evil?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Parkland Survivor David Hogg Tells Media to Stop Naming School Shooters (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Parkland Survivor David Hogg Tells Media to Stop Naming School Shooters