Poll of the Day > Conservatives PARTY with Christian Baker who can now REFUSE Service to GAYS!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

Colorado Christian Kook is all smug today after the Supreme Court sided with him in a shocking 7-2 vote that now allows him to REFUSE SERVICE to GAY PEOPLE!!

He was in court after he refused to bake a cake to a gay couple as he was seen rejoicing with hundreds of conservatives who took SELFIES with him as they now call him a CONSERVATIVE HERO!!

The ruling was limited however as it didn't deal with the biggest concern, whether religious people like Jack Phillips could refuse to serve gay or lesbian people.

The Supreme Court described this as an anti-religious bias on the Colorado Civil Rights Commission when it ruled against him

He refused ot make a cake for Charlie Craig and David Mullins in 2012 and the gay couple filed a complaint with the commission. That commission ru led in their favour stating he had violatd the anti-discrimination law that bars businesses from discrimination against customers based on their race, religion, gender and sexual orientation

Justice Anthony Kennedy who was supposed to be the swing vote voted with the majority anyway stating Phillips deserve to exercise his rights and they were violated because of his religious beliefs but liberals Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan also voted with the majority when Elena is a LESBIAN HERSELF!!.

While the court has set aside the question of whether businesses can refuse service to gay couples because of their religious beliefs are other cases in the pipeline that will force the court to give their opinion eventualy.

Appeals in similar cases are pending including one from a florist refusing to sell flowers to a lesbian couple

The decision was a victory for conservative Christians as Kristen Waggoner said "Government hostility toward people of faith has no place in our society, yet the state of Colorado was openly antagonist toward Jack's religious beliefs about marriage"

ACLU Laywer Louse Melling said this was a huge stepback towards equal rights as Louise Melling said that this ruling reaffirmed its longstanding rule that states can prevent the harms of discrimination in the marketplace..

Gay rights advocaates said this is one part of a bigger struggle seeking greater legal protections for LGBT people as they fight efforts by conservatives to undermine gains secured in years.

Nontheless, Conservatives came out and took selfies with Jack and said he is a HERO to them for fighting liberals as they hope this leads to more pushback against their right to refuse service based on their beliefs.

Would you support a business that refused service to certain groups of people (assuming you are NOT one of those people)?

Jack - Christian Kook

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/04/18/4CE83EE200000578-5803945-image-a-99_1528131973731.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/04/21/4CE9291800000578-5803945-image-a-10_1528145319138.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/04/18/4CE8398C00000578-5803945-image-a-103_1528132032583.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/04/21/4CE9231C00000578-5803945-image-a-9_1528145317063.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/04/18/4CE8431200000578-5803945-image-a-101_1528132021168.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/04/18/4CE8523100000578-5803945-image-m-104_1528132051297.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/04/21/4CE925B000000578-5803945-image-a-11_1528145320663.jpg

Charlie and David -

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/04/20/4CE8FC4F00000578-5803945-image-a-8_1528142322452.jpg
---

Full Throttle posted...

7-2 vote that now allows him to REFUSE SERVICE to GAY PEOPLE!!

One specific service
---

Duckbear doesn't understand the case, why am I not surprised
---

I wouldn't. I'm fine with said business being against certain groups of people (i.e. Chick Fil A) but if they outright refuse to serve them, that's where I draw the line. That being said, I still wouldn't force it on the business.
---

InfestedAdam posted...

I wouldn't. I'm fine with said business being against certain groups of people (i.e. Chick Fil A) but if they outright refuse to serve them, that's where I draw the line. That being said, I still wouldn't force it on the business.

I think it should go even further-they should have the courage to put a sign up saying who they don;t want to serve/do business with and see how popular they really are, if the free market decides that they don't care then so be it but they should own up to their views at the door if they're going to deny service.
---

XlaxJynx007 posted...

Duckbear doesn't understand the case, why am I not surprised

---

Full Throttle posted...

Would you support a business that refused service to certain groups of people (assuming you are NOT one of those people)?

Not knowingly, and particularly not in the area where I live, as any business like that is likely going to be tied to one of the two extremist groups in the region.

One of these groups has bought up quite a few of the commercial buildings in the area. The founder, a man both of my parents know quite well, has done all of it to enrich himself; he told them of his plans to do this when they were all still in high school.
---

Who's Christian Baker?
---

The only thing this ruling says is that the Colorado courts were biased against his religion. It doesn't even say he's allowed to discriminate, just that the ruling saying he couldn't has to be thrown out because the trial was conducted improperly.
---

No, he can't refuse service to gays. The ruling was that Colorado treated him unfairly because of his religion.
---

keyblader1985 posted...

Who's Christian Baker?

---

Can I party with Christian Baker?
---

Stop twisting the case to suit your agenda. He can't "refuse service to gay people", but he has a right to refuse to do something that would violate his religious beliefs, in this case, being involved in a gay wedding, which he does not want to take part in.
---

WindMouseHanpan posted...

Stop twisting the case to suit your agenda. He can't "refuse service to gay people", but he has a right to refuse to do something that would violate his religious beliefs, in this case, being involved in a gay wedding, which he does not want to take part in.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/3-poll-of-the-day/76675427/902588833

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/3-poll-of-the-day/76673289/902525425
---