Current Events > STUDY: Anti-gay and racist people are more likely to have lower IQ

(+) Yeah! (+)

CrimsonRage posted...

Pillowpantz posted...

Is there anything more racist than affirmative action?

you?

Kaboom
---

KINDERFELD posted...

Fuparulez posted...

The study, by academics at Brock University in Ontario, Canada, used information from two UK studies from 1958 and 1970 , where several thousand children were assessed for intelligence at age 10 and 11, and then asked political questions aged 33.

The 1958 National Child Development involved 4,267 men and 4,537 women born in 1958.

Awesome. A sixty year old study from England is the source, and lefties eat it up... and then call US the dumb ones.

Lmao are you saying a study that's been conducted for 60 years is not as good because of the length of time?

Are you 12 years old?

He may not be 12 years old, but he did prove the conclusion of the study
---

http://www.dailymail.co.uk

---

https://imgur.com/KFDYxNC
---

Not surprising in the slightest.

Some of the dumbest people I know are those who harbor so much hatred towards women, gays, and blacks.
---

Is it ok to look at this in the context of Islam or would that be hate speech?
---

tennisdude818 posted...

Is it ok to look at this in the context of Islam or would that be hate speech?

It is probably not coincidence that most anti-gay bigots are heavily religious.
---

Illogical people are less intelligent? Who'd a thunk....
---

tennisdude818 posted...

Is it ok to look at this in the context of Islam or would that be hate speech?

Sure, but there's also the context of their governments making it punishable by death. You have no excuse to hate gay people in America.
---

Wow, not only did someone call me anti-gay, racist, and low IQ'd, but they also tagged me in the post so that I can easily report them.

Gee, and his main is in purgatory. I wonder why...
---

RoboLaserGandhi posted...

I thought liberals didn't like statistics that try to make conclusions about groups of people based on IQ.

They don't, when it goes against their ideals. They eat it up when it strokes their misguided, deformed political ego, though.

Sorry, but biased liberal "studies" using cherry-picked candidates are hardly science. I'm far more intelligent than most of the people on this board and I hate the left and would never support their political agenda.

I wouldn't consider myself either side, but liberals are definitely the more irritating side. They fabricate more garbage to support their opinions than anyone else on the planet.
---

SageHarpuia posted...

Wow, not only did someone call me anti-gay, racist, and low IQ'd, but they also tagged me in the post so that I can easily report them.

Gee, and his main is in purgatory. I wonder why...

---

fenderbender321 posted...

Here's how it goes in order of intelligence.

1. Libertarians
2. Liberals
3. Conservatives

No. Here's how it goes:

1. People who don't side with any specific political agenda.
2. People who casually take a side, but don't push it very hard.
3. Conservatives and Mild/Moderate Liberals
4. Neo-Nazis and Extreme Liberals (most liberals)
5. People who post stupid topics smashing people with differing opinions than them.
6. Tumblr
---

fenderbender321 posted...

Here's how it goes in order of intelligence.

1. Libertarians
2. Liberals
3. Conservatives

---

TheUsualSuspect posted...

SageHarpuia posted...

Wow, not only did someone call me anti-gay, racist, and low IQ'd, but they also tagged me in the post so that I can easily report them.

Gee, and his main is in purgatory. I wonder why...

clearaflagrantj posted...

Inb4 stupid ra---

Aww, I was way too late.
---

fenderbender321 posted...

Here's how it goes in order of intelligence.

1. Libertarians
2. Liberals
3. Conservatives

This post would have more credibility behind it if you didn't use your libertarian views to excuse your views on fucking horses.
---

TheUsualSuspect posted...

I think he's just butthurt that the study is calling anti gay people unintelligent. Won't you please think of the feelings of poor bigots?

i dont think the word means what you think it means.

bigot/bt/
noun

a person who is intolerant towards those holding different opinions.

quite a lot of intolerant circlejerking itt no? or is it ok to be intolerant against some groups? i keep forgetting what groups are on the bare intolerance list.
---

Oh look, it's the "please be tolerant of my intolerance" guy
---

RoboLaserGandhi posted...

I thought liberals didn't like statistics that try to make conclusions about groups of people based on IQ.

They don't unless it suits their agenda.
---

perhaps we should do some tests on poor individuals who can only come to the conclusion that if you attack group A you MUST be defending group B.
---

BillWardsPants posted...

https://imgur.com/KFDYxNC

I just looked up that twitter account & theres like a 90% chance (at least) that the person who runs that account is some /pol/ incel.
---

ModLogic posted...

perhaps we should do some tests on poor individuals who can only come to the conclusion that if you attack group A you MUST be defending group B.

You constantly come into topics like this whining about the hurt feelings of the poor bigots
---

TheUsualSuspect posted...

ModLogic posted...

perhaps we should do some tests on poor individuals who can only come to the conclusion that if you attack group A you MUST be defending group B.

You constantly come into topics like this whining about the hurt feelings of the poor bigots

bigot/bt/
noun

a person who is intolerant towards those holding different opinions.

which group of bigots are you referring to?
---

ModLogic posted...

which group of bigots are you referring to?

The anti gay and racist people, obviously. Or are you really going to claim its just as bad to dislike racist people as it is to be racist?
---

hmmm? but the hurt feelings seem to be coming from the group being called out for not knowing the definition of the label they are blindly using.

bigot/bt/
noun

a person who is intolerant towards those holding different opinions.

---

TheUsualSuspect posted...

ModLogic posted...

which group of bigots are you referring to?

The anti gay and racist people, obviously. Or are you really going to claim its just as bad to dislike racist people as it is to be racist?

Inb4 "Why are liberals so intolerant to my intolerant views, liberals are the real racists to be intolerant to my racist views!!!"
---

You seem to be confused. The only hurt feelings here are coming from people upset with the implications of the study
---

Liberal intelligence.


---

BillWardsPants posted...

Liberal intelligence.

1. You already posted this.
2. If you zoom in on the picture, thats very clearly peanut butter.
3.

I just looked up that twitter account & theres like a 90% chance (at least) that the person who runs that account is some /pol/ incel.

---

Gafemage posted...

1. You already posted this.
2. If you zoom in on the picture, thats very clearly peanut butter.

BillWardsPants is doing a great job of corroborating the study as well
---

epik_fail1 posted...

TheUsualSuspect posted...

ModLogic posted...

which group of bigots are you referring to?

The anti gay and racist people, obviously. Or are you really going to claim its just as bad to dislike racist people as it is to be racist?

Inb4 "Why are liberals so intolerant to my intolerant views, liberals are the real racists to be intolerant to my racist views!!!"

"Why is it ok to call anti-gay bigots stupid, but not black people? Checkmate, liberal hypocrites!"
---

Ever watch docs about supremacist groups?

I feel like the study was unnecessary
---

Who conducted this study, Anita Sarkeesian?

KirbyMagicWand posted...

When I read that study, I couldn't help but think of all those Christians who refused to bake a cake and provide other services for the "scary gays."

Like, you're definitely fucking damaged if you can't recognize that gay people are just human beings. They're not these demons who are going to send you to hell or anything.

Except when a gay couple intentionally tries to attack, and ruin the life of an innocent Christian business owner. Those aren't human beings worth my, or anyone's time.

JahnDixonUSA posted...

KirbyMagicWand posted...

When I read that study, I couldn't help but think of all those Christians who refused to bake a cake and provide other services for the "scary gays."

Like, you're definitely fucking damaged if you can't recognize that gay people are just human beings. They're not these demons who are going to send you to hell or anything.

Except when a gay couple intentionally tries to attack, and ruin the life of an innocent Christian business owner. Those aren't human beings worth my, or anyone's time.

---

@PokemonExpert44
---

JahnDixonUSA posted...

KirbyMagicWand posted...

When I read that study, I couldn't help but think of all those Christians who refused to bake a cake and provide other services for the "scary gays."

Like, you're definitely fucking damaged if you can't recognize that gay people are just human beings. They're not these demons who are going to send you to hell or anything.

Except when a gay couple intentionally tries to attack, and ruin the life of an innocent Christian business owner. Those aren't human beings worth my, or anyone's time.

but of course, you have no problems with christian parents abandoning their own children.
---

JahnDixonUSA posted...

Who conducted this study, Anita Sarkeesian?

What.... Uhhhh... What are you trying to say here buds.
---

Tell me something I don't already know TC. :v
---