Current Events > rudy says trumps gonna pardon manafort

Topic List	Page List: 1
Bluebomber182 06/15/18 3:36:37 PM #1:	http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ny-news-rudy-muller-pardons-trump-manafort-20180615-story.html --- Everyday is Rusev Day! <cite>Bluebomber182 posted [p:903325026] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote>http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ny-news-rudy-muller-pardons-trump-manafort-20180615-story.html</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_BIueMonk 06/15/18 3:37:22 PM #2:	for what?! he hasn't been sentenced! he was arrested, released on bail, broke the law AGAIN (witness tampering) and put in jail! fuck off with this shit --- DAHYUN = <3 https://imgtc.com/i/ocYHmoZ.gif <cite>_BIueMonk posted [p:903325074] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote>for what?! he hasn't been sentenced! he was arrested, released on bail, broke the law AGAIN (witness tampering) and put in jail! fuck off with this shit</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 06/15/18 3:38:06 PM #3:	I can't tell who in the administration thinks Rudy is helping or why. --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:903325124] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote>I can't tell who in the administration thinks Rudy is helping or why.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 06/15/18 3:38:14 PM #4:	That makes Trump look innocent. --- No sig. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:903325135] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote>That makes Trump look innocent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
frozenshock 06/15/18 3:38:56 PM #5:	_BIueMonk posted... for what?! he hasn't been sentenced! he was arrested, released on bail, broke the law AGAIN (witness tampering) and put in jail! fuck off with this shit Trump probably believes he can issue pre-emptive pardons. Like, a pardon for any and all crimes he may be charged with in the future. He could potentially issue a pre-emptive pardon to himself, his family, and every republican member of congress. Maybe he could also threaten to revoke the pardon to any congressman who votes against him on a bill. This might help him get some leverage. --- I don't hate people, people hate me. <cite>frozenshock posted [p:903325176] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>_BIueMonk posted...</cite> <quote>for what?! he hasn't been sentenced! he was arrested, released on bail, broke the law AGAIN (witness tampering) and put in jail! fuck off with this shit</quote> Trump probably believes he can issue pre-emptive pardons. Like, a pardon for any and all crimes he may be charged with in the future. He could potentially issue a pre-emptive pardon to himself, his family, and every republican member of congress. Maybe he could also threaten to revoke the pardon to any congressman who votes against him on a bill. This might help him get some leverage.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BJ-blazkowics 06/15/18 3:39:02 PM #6:	That'd be text book obstruction of justice. Costitutional crisis here we go! <cite>BJ-blazkowics posted [p:903325183] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote>That'd be text book obstruction of justice. Costitutional crisis here we go!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darkman124 06/15/18 3:40:25 PM #7:	When the whole thing is over, things might get cleaned up with some presidential pardons, the former New York mayor told the Daily News. would not be pre-emptive; clearly is a message to manafort: don't make a deal and we'll cover your ass --- And when the hourglass has run out, eternity asks you about only one thing: whether you have lived in despair or not. <cite>Darkman124 posted [p:903325284] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><quote>When the whole thing is over, things might get cleaned up with some presidential pardons, the former New York mayor told the Daily News. </quote> would not be pre-emptive; clearly is a message to manafort: don't make a deal and we'll cover your ass</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Letron_James 06/15/18 3:43:13 PM #8:	If im not mistaken he cannot be pardoned from both a state crime and a federal crime so... He can pardon him to a shittier Prison. --- Ask me if I would eat da booty. <cite>Letron_James posted [p:903325469] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote>If im not mistaken he cannot be pardoned from both a state crime and a federal crime so... He can pardon him to a shittier Prison.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
frozenshock 06/15/18 3:44:39 PM #9:	Letron_James posted... If im not mistaken he cannot be pardoned from both a state crime and a federal crime so... He can pardon him to a shittier Prison. Meh. Details. Just wait until Ginsburg retires from the Supreme Court and Trump will put in a judge who can fix that little thing. --- I don't hate people, people hate me. <cite>frozenshock posted [p:903325578] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>Letron_James posted...</cite> <quote>If im not mistaken he cannot be pardoned from both a state crime and a federal crime so... He can pardon him to a shittier Prison.</quote> Meh. Details. Just wait until Ginsburg retires from the Supreme Court and Trump will put in a judge who can fix that little thing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BLAKUboy 06/15/18 3:45:19 PM #10:	Antifar posted... I can't tell who in the administration thinks Rudy is helping or why. Trump does because they're both equal levels of fucking moron. Letron_James posted... If im not mistaken he cannot be pardoned from both a state crime and a federal crime so... He can pardon him to a shittier Prison. Presidential pardons can't cover state prosecutions, no. --- Aeris dies if she takes more damage than her current HP - Panthera https://signavatar.com/26999_s.png <cite>BLAKUboy posted [p:903325623] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>I can't tell who in the administration thinks Rudy is helping or why.</quote> Trump does because they're both equal levels of fucking moron. <cite>Letron_James posted...</cite> <quote>If im not mistaken he cannot be pardoned from both a state crime and a federal crime so... He can pardon him to a shittier Prison.</quote> Presidential pardons can't cover state prosecutions, no.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BLAKUboy 06/15/18 3:51:10 PM #11:	frozenshock posted... Meh. Details. Just wait until Ginsburg retires from the Supreme Court and Trump will put in a judge who can fix that little thing. I do not believe the Supreme Court can rewrite the Constitution. --- Aeris dies if she takes more damage than her current HP - Panthera https://signavatar.com/26999_s.png <cite>BLAKUboy posted [p:903326000] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>Meh. Details. Just wait until Ginsburg retires from the Supreme Court and Trump will put in a judge who can fix that little thing.</quote> I do not believe the Supreme Court can rewrite the Constitution.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
frozenshock 06/15/18 3:56:20 PM #12:	BLAKUboy posted... frozenshock posted... Meh. Details. Just wait until Ginsburg retires from the Supreme Court and Trump will put in a judge who can fix that little thing. I do not believe the Supreme Court can rewrite the Constitution. Who's gonna stop them? You can't exactly appeal their decisions to the Privy Council of the United Kingdom. I mean you should, but unfortunately it's not possible. --- I don't hate people, people hate me. <cite>frozenshock posted [p:903326380] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>Meh. Details. Just wait until Ginsburg retires from the Supreme Court and Trump will put in a judge who can fix that little thing.</quote> I do not believe the Supreme Court can rewrite the Constitution.</quote> Who's gonna stop them? You can't exactly appeal their decisions to the Privy Council of the United Kingdom. I mean you should, but unfortunately it's not possible.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hornezz 06/15/18 3:57:18 PM #13:	frozenshock posted... _BIueMonk posted... for what?! he hasn't been sentenced! he was arrested, released on bail, broke the law AGAIN (witness tampering) and put in jail! fuck off with this shit Trump probably believes he can issue pre-emptive pardons. Like, a pardon for any and all crimes he may be charged with in the future. I'm no lawyer, but the pardon power is pretty far reaching. Ford pardoned Nixon before he was charged with any crimes. --- In dentibus anticis frustum magnum spinaciae habes. <cite>Hornezz posted [p:903326456] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_BIueMonk posted...</cite> <quote>for what?! he hasn't been sentenced! he was arrested, released on bail, broke the law AGAIN (witness tampering) and put in jail! fuck off with this shit</quote> Trump probably believes he can issue pre-emptive pardons. Like, a pardon for any and all crimes he may be charged with in the future.</quote> I'm no lawyer, but the pardon power is pretty far reaching. Ford pardoned Nixon before he was charged with any crimes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
frozenshock 06/15/18 4:03:57 PM #14:	Hornezz posted... I'm no lawyer, but the pardon power is pretty far reaching. Ford pardoned Nixon before he was charged with any crimes. It was controversial but it's not like if there was court decision confirming that it was legal. Congress decided to drop the impeachment --- I don't hate people, people hate me. <cite>frozenshock posted [p:903326910] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>Hornezz posted...</cite> <quote>I'm no lawyer, but the pardon power is pretty far reaching. Ford pardoned Nixon before he was charged with any crimes.</quote> It was controversial but it's not like if there was court decision confirming that it was legal. Congress decided to drop the impeachment</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BJ-blazkowics 06/15/18 4:08:00 PM #15:	BLAKUboy posted... frozenshock posted... Meh. Details. Just wait until Ginsburg retires from the Supreme Court and Trump will put in a judge who can fix that little thing. I do not believe the Supreme Court can rewrite the Constitution. No, but assholes like Gorsuch can "interpret it" to fit his bigoted views. He already tried to do it regarding the right to privacy. His argument is "when the founders wrote the constitution email and phones didn't exist, so the constitution didn't mean those, therefore, you got no right for privacy". The conservatives will come up with a reasoning like "the founders didn't envision black, hispanic and middle eastern people when they wrote the term "people" and "rights", therefore they got no rights" <cite>BJ-blazkowics posted [p:903327180] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>Meh. Details. Just wait until Ginsburg retires from the Supreme Court and Trump will put in a judge who can fix that little thing.</quote> I do not believe the Supreme Court can rewrite the Constitution.</quote> No, but assholes like Gorsuch can "interpret it" to fit his bigoted views. He already tried to do it regarding the right to privacy. His argument is "when the founders wrote the constitution email and phones didn't exist, so the constitution didn't mean those, therefore, you got no right for privacy". The conservatives will come up with a reasoning like "the founders didn't envision black, hispanic and middle eastern people when they wrote the term "people" and "rights", therefore they got no rights"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Polycosm 06/15/18 4:12:45 PM #16:	I dont understand the justification for putting him in jail, Giuliani, 74, said. You put a guy in jail if hes trying to kill witnesses, not just talking to witnesses. What in the literal fuck. --- BKSheikah owned me so thoroughly in the 2017 guru contest, I'd swear he used the Lens of Truth to pick his bracket. (thengamer.com/guru) <cite>Polycosm posted [p:903327521] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><quote>I dont understand the justification for putting him in jail, Giuliani, 74, said. You put a guy in jail if hes trying to kill witnesses, not just talking to witnesses.</quote> What in the literal fuck.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
davyheinz 06/15/18 4:13:52 PM #17:	Polycosm posted... I dont understand the justification for putting him in jail, Giuliani, 74, said. You put a guy in jail if hes trying to kill witnesses, not just talking to witnesses. What in the literal fuck. Giuliani has the worst defenses, so fucking funny --- Currently playing: Strider, Resident Evil 6, Jet Force Gemini, Psychonauts, Legend of Zelda: WindWaker HD <cite>davyheinz posted [p:903327597] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>Polycosm posted...</cite> <quote><quote>I dont understand the justification for putting him in jail, Giuliani, 74, said. You put a guy in jail if hes trying to kill witnesses, not just talking to witnesses.</quote> What in the literal fuck.</quote> Giuliani has the worst defenses, so fucking funny</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
frozenshock 06/15/18 4:14:50 PM #18:	BJ-blazkowics posted... No, but assholes like Gorsuch can "interpret it" to fit his bigoted views. He already tried to do it regarding the right to privacy. His argument is "when the founders wrote the constitution email and phones didn't exist, so the constitution didn't mean those, therefore, you got no right for privacy". The conservatives will come up with a reasoning like "the founders didn't envision black, hispanic and middle eastern people when they wrote the term "people" and "rights", therefore they got no rights" AK-47s didn't exist either when the constitution was written. --- I don't hate people, people hate me. <cite>frozenshock posted [p:903327674] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>BJ-blazkowics posted...</cite> <quote>No, but assholes like Gorsuch can "interpret it" to fit his bigoted views. He already tried to do it regarding the right to privacy. His argument is "when the founders wrote the constitution email and phones didn't exist, so the constitution didn't mean those, therefore, you got no right for privacy". The conservatives will come up with a reasoning like "the founders didn't envision black, hispanic and middle eastern people when they wrote the term "people" and "rights", therefore they got no rights"</quote> AK-47s didn't exist either when the constitution was written.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BJ-blazkowics 06/15/18 4:15:40 PM #19:	frozenshock posted... BJ-blazkowics posted... No, but assholes like Gorsuch can "interpret it" to fit his bigoted views. He already tried to do it regarding the right to privacy. His argument is "when the founders wrote the constitution email and phones didn't exist, so the constitution didn't mean those, therefore, you got no right for privacy". The conservatives will come up with a reasoning like "the founders didn't envision black, hispanic and middle eastern people when they wrote the term "people" and "rights", therefore they got no rights" AK-47s didn't exist either when the constitution was written. I know, their "textualist" bullshit is so shallow. <cite>BJ-blazkowics posted [p:903327744] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BJ-blazkowics posted...</cite> <quote>No, but assholes like Gorsuch can "interpret it" to fit his bigoted views. He already tried to do it regarding the right to privacy. His argument is "when the founders wrote the constitution email and phones didn't exist, so the constitution didn't mean those, therefore, you got no right for privacy". The conservatives will come up with a reasoning like "the founders didn't envision black, hispanic and middle eastern people when they wrote the term "people" and "rights", therefore they got no rights"</quote> AK-47s didn't exist either when the constitution was written.</quote> I know, their "textualist" bullshit is so shallow.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
davyheinz 06/15/18 4:17:08 PM #20:	BJ-blazkowics posted... frozenshock posted... BJ-blazkowics posted... No, but assholes like Gorsuch can "interpret it" to fit his bigoted views. He already tried to do it regarding the right to privacy. His argument is "when the founders wrote the constitution email and phones didn't exist, so the constitution didn't mean those, therefore, you got no right for privacy". The conservatives will come up with a reasoning like "the founders didn't envision black, hispanic and middle eastern people when they wrote the term "people" and "rights", therefore they got no rights" AK-47s didn't exist either when the constitution was written. I know, their "textualist" bullshit is so shallow. And it demonstrates how outdated the Constitution is. For something people love too much to change, they sure love to vaguely interpret it and refuse to acknowledge faults in it. --- Currently playing: Strider, Resident Evil 6, Jet Force Gemini, Psychonauts, Legend of Zelda: WindWaker HD <cite>davyheinz posted [p:903327861] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>BJ-blazkowics posted...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BJ-blazkowics posted...</cite> <quote>No, but assholes like Gorsuch can "interpret it" to fit his bigoted views. He already tried to do it regarding the right to privacy. His argument is "when the founders wrote the constitution email and phones didn't exist, so the constitution didn't mean those, therefore, you got no right for privacy". The conservatives will come up with a reasoning like "the founders didn't envision black, hispanic and middle eastern people when they wrote the term "people" and "rights", therefore they got no rights"</quote> AK-47s didn't exist either when the constitution was written.</quote> I know, their "textualist" bullshit is so shallow.</quote> And it demonstrates how outdated the Constitution is. For something people love too much to change, they sure love to vaguely interpret it and refuse to acknowledge faults in it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BJ-blazkowics 06/15/18 4:54:40 PM #21:	davyheinz posted... BJ-blazkowics posted... frozenshock posted... BJ-blazkowics posted... No, but assholes like Gorsuch can "interpret it" to fit his bigoted views. He already tried to do it regarding the right to privacy. His argument is "when the founders wrote the constitution email and phones didn't exist, so the constitution didn't mean those, therefore, you got no right for privacy". The conservatives will come up with a reasoning like "the founders didn't envision black, hispanic and middle eastern people when they wrote the term "people" and "rights", therefore they got no rights" AK-47s didn't exist either when the constitution was written. I know, their "textualist" bullshit is so shallow. And it demonstrates how outdated the Constitution is. For something people love too much to change, they sure love to vaguely interpret it and refuse to acknowledge faults in it. It's fairly outdated, sure. But we could never come up with a better document nowadays. The founding fathers loved their country and were non-partisan. Now you'd have democrats trying to make an amendment like "male votes should count 1/2 to make up for the patriarchy" and republicans making amendments like "BTW people of color aren't real people", and that is why touching the constitution in this day and age would be dangerous and difficult. <cite>BJ-blazkowics posted [p:903330311] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>davyheinz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BJ-blazkowics posted...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BJ-blazkowics posted...</cite> <quote>No, but assholes like Gorsuch can "interpret it" to fit his bigoted views. He already tried to do it regarding the right to privacy. His argument is "when the founders wrote the constitution email and phones didn't exist, so the constitution didn't mean those, therefore, you got no right for privacy". The conservatives will come up with a reasoning like "the founders didn't envision black, hispanic and middle eastern people when they wrote the term "people" and "rights", therefore they got no rights"</quote> AK-47s didn't exist either when the constitution was written.</quote> I know, their "textualist" bullshit is so shallow.</quote> And it demonstrates how outdated the Constitution is. For something people love too much to change, they sure love to vaguely interpret it and refuse to acknowledge faults in it.</quote> It's fairly outdated, sure. But we could never come up with a better document nowadays. The founding fathers loved their country and were non-partisan. Now you'd have democrats trying to make an amendment like "male votes should count 1/2 to make up for the patriarchy" and republicans making amendments like "BTW people of color aren't real people", and that is why touching the constitution in this day and age would be dangerous and difficult.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ultimate reaver 06/15/18 4:56:41 PM #22:	at the very least trump can take solace in the fact that after his shitty presidency there is going to be quite a bit of money that could be made if someone were to make a tv series of trump trying to do shitty slimy stuff and giuliani stumbling in like mr magoo and screwing everything up --- butts <cite>ultimate reaver posted [p:903330432] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote>at the very least trump can take solace in the fact that after his shitty presidency there is going to be quite a bit of money that could be made if someone were to make a tv series of trump trying to do shitty slimy stuff and giuliani stumbling in like mr magoo and screwing everything up</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#23	Post #23 was unavailable or deleted.
Antifar 06/15/18 5:04:44 PM #24:	shockthemonkey posted... Its pathetic watching tough on crime politicians like Trump and Giuliani cry about the law when it hurts their buddies. It was never about crime. --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:903330935] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote>Its pathetic watching tough on crime politicians like Trump and Giuliani cry about the law when it hurts their buddies.</quote> It was never about crime.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DifferentialEquation 06/15/18 5:06:01 PM #25:	I kind of hope that Manafort is convicted and that Trump does pardon him. The left would have a meltdown of epic proportions. --- There's no business to be taxed. <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:903331011] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote>I kind of hope that Manafort is convicted and that Trump does pardon him. The left would have a meltdown of epic proportions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426 06/15/18 5:09:00 PM #26:	frozenshock posted... Who's gonna stop them? You can't exactly appeal their decisions to the Privy Council of the United Kingdom. I mean you should, but unfortunately it's not possible. The states that would refuse to release them. Hopefully. It was controversial but it's not like if there was court decision confirming that it was legal. Congress decided to drop the impeachment Congress dropping the impeachment had nothing to do with Nixon getting pardoned. Impeachment only strips the person of their position, since Nixon was no longer a President they couldn't stripe that from him. <cite>JE19426 posted [p:903331191] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>Who's gonna stop them? You can't exactly appeal their decisions to the Privy Council of the United Kingdom. I mean you should, but unfortunately it's not possible. </quote> The states that would refuse to release them. Hopefully. <quote>It was controversial but it's not like if there was court decision confirming that it was legal. Congress decided to drop the impeachment </quote> Congress dropping the impeachment had nothing to do with Nixon getting pardoned. Impeachment only strips the person of their position, since Nixon was no longer a President they couldn't stripe that from him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab 06/15/18 5:09:29 PM #27:	I genuinely think that Trump could get better legal advice by asking a random person off the street than by consulting Giuliani. It's like he got his law degree by mailing in tabs from cereal boxes --- https://imgur.com/VeNBg https://imgur.com/gd5jC8q https://imgur.com/PKIy7 https://imgur.com/3p29JqP <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:903331221] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote>I genuinely think that Trump could get better legal advice by asking a random person off the street than by consulting Giuliani. It's like he got his law degree by mailing in tabs from cereal boxes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#28	Post #28 was unavailable or deleted.
Hexenherz 06/15/18 5:10:18 PM #29:	Antifar posted... I can't tell who in the administration thinks Rudy is helping or why. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dont-be-fooled-giuliani-has-a-strategy/2018/05/07/9795eb06-5227-11e8-9c91-7dab596e8252_story.html ?noredirect=on&utm_term=.149bd98df5fc --- ESO: @Ultima_Vyse RS3: UltimaSuende . 99 WC/99 FISH/ 85/99 Cooking <cite>Hexenherz posted [p:903331281] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>I can't tell who in the administration thinks Rudy is helping or why.</quote> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dont-be-fooled-giuliani-has-a-strategy/2018/05/07/9795eb06-5227-11e8-9c91-7dab596e8252_story.html ?noredirect=on&utm_term=.149bd98df5fc</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
muchdran 06/15/18 5:14:39 PM #30:	_BIueMonk posted... for what?! he hasn't been sentenced! he was arrested, released on bail, broke the law AGAIN (witness tampering) and put in jail! fuck off with this shit And ignored --- If liberals didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have standards at all. <cite>muchdran posted [p:903331518] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>_BIueMonk posted...</cite> <quote>for what?! he hasn't been sentenced! he was arrested, released on bail, broke the law AGAIN (witness tampering) and put in jail! fuck off with this shit</quote> And ignored</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Phantom_Nook 06/15/18 5:16:14 PM #31:	Polycosm posted... I dont understand the justification for putting him in jail, Giuliani, 74, said. You put a guy in jail if hes trying to kill witnesses, not just talking to witnesses. What in the literal fuck. "he was just making sure they had their stories straight. what's wrong with that?" --- When a girl has sex with a bunch of guys, they call her a slut, but when a guy does it, they call him gay. ~ Antifar <cite>Phantom_Nook posted [p:903331610] in rudy says ... [t:76717337]...</cite> <quote><cite>Polycosm posted...</cite> <quote><quote>I dont understand the justification for putting him in jail, Giuliani, 74, said. You put a guy in jail if hes trying to kill witnesses, not just talking to witnesses.</quote> What in the literal fuck.</quote> "he was just making sure they had their stories straight. what's wrong with that?"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > rudy says trumps gonna pardon manafort (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > rudy says trumps gonna pardon manafort